Transcript for #361 – Aaron Smith-Levin: Scientology

SPEAKER_00

00:00 - 06:11

The following is a conversation with Aaron Smith 11, a former Scientologist raised in Scientology and have worked in the organization full-time for many years as a staff member and a CEO or a member, including the job of training Scientology auditors. Today, he educates the public about Scientology on his YouTube channel called Growing Up in Scientology. And now, a quick user can mention of each sponsor. Check them out. In the description, it's the best way to support this podcast. We've got green, chef for delicious and healthy, easy-to-make meals inside tracker for bio-modernering and athletic greens for gut health. Choose wise in my friends. Also, if you want to work on our amazing team, we're always hiring. Go to lexfreedman.com slash hiring. And now, onto the full ad reads, as always, no ads in the middle. I try to make these interesting, but if you skip them, please still check out our sponsors, I enjoy their stuff. Maybe you will too. This episode is brought to you by Green Chef, a California certified organic farmer company. That makes it easy to eat. Well, with meal plans for every lifestyle. They have a number of one meal kits for eating well with options for keto vegan vegetarian, fast and fit, Mediterranean and gluten free. Of course, you know which one I pick. I'm still on keto. I'm still on carnivore. I jump around. I'm not religiously anyone particular diet but I just feel much better when the number of carbs I consume is very low and I should also say that I don't do cheap meals which I think is a popular notion that I should be able to follow which doesn't work for me I enjoy life so much more when I You sort of cheat by having just a tiny bit of carbs, not like just pig out completely. So I guess cheat by like a quick little detour, a quick little glance, not a full on affair. You know what I'm saying? Anyway, the keto is ridiculous. But the keto meals from our green chef is really, that's my go to it's delicious. I really highly recommend it also. because variety to my intake which makes me feel like I'm enjoying life even more than I already have been. Anyway, go to greenshift.com slash Lex 60 and use code Lex 60 to get 60% off plus free shipping. That's greenshift.com slash Lex 16 use code Lex 60 for 60% off plus free shipping. This shows also brought to you by Insight Tracker. As soon as I used to track the data that comes from the biological system that some refer to as a Lex Friedman. But I'm just a collection of cells. I'm underneath that collection of atoms. I'm a collection of a lot of things. Billion is trillions and somehow they're all like in this one bag that move together. This meat vehicle that operates with other meat vehicles in meat space and does interesting things and is worried and is hopeful and is ecstatic sometimes sometimes is afraid and at the end of the day the ride ends too quickly for that meat bag that I guess others call Lex, but I don't even know what I call myself in my own head. How am I even talking to you right now? What is this? A bunch of cells, neurons, a firing, creating a thought, creating an experience of a thought, allowing me in a metaway, to discuss the experience of a thought, and here we are. And I'm speaking in a technology build by humans, alone in a room, but you, another human, are now listening to this. What is this? Anyway, if you want to get a little data on this giant mystery, this beautiful mystery that is the biology of our human body, you should use inside tracker and you can get special savings for a limited time and you go to insidetracker.com slash Lex. This show is also brought to you by Athletic Greens and his AG1 drink, which is an all-in-one daily drink to support better health and peak performance. I take it twice a day. I take it after a run along run in a now warm Texas weather. Slowly getting ready for that Texas heat. I mean, I love those long runs along the river. And you where I go, just long runs alone, my thoughts. Well, I'm listening to Brown Noiser, an audio book. That just takes me away. Takes me away for an hour or two or three depending on how long the run is. It's just something in a different world. And when I come back, come back into this world. The first entry point is an athletic greens drink. Sometimes I'll put it in the fridge and then take a quick shower and drink it cold. is the least you see the way warm cold doesn't matter just put a little pot or some water just it's magic and I also want to travel I take it it gives me that feeling that I've gotten my life in order at least for the nutritional stuff they'll give you one month supply official when you sign up at athleticgreens.com slash wax This is Alex Friedman podcast. The supported, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now dear friends, here's Aaron Smith 11. Let's do a full overview of Scientology. It's ideas, how it operates, how it wields its power and influence. And let's start at the very basics. What is Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

06:11 - 07:11

Scientology is a belief system, created by Al-Rainhubberd, that does fundamentally believe that we are all immortal spiritual beings, called Thaitons, that we have native Godlike potential. that there is nothing more powerful in the universe than a Thaiton. Like so, God like is quite literal here. And that through various decisions, Thaitons have made. They have fallen away from their native God-like power to fall down to a state where most Thaitons aren't even aware that they are Thaitons aren't even aware that they ever have lived before or have these powers. And that things are now in a state where they're trapped in bodies, trapped here on Earth, trapped in this prison of a physical universe, trapped on this prison of a planet. And that only Scientology can restore a thing to its native state.

SPEAKER_00

07:11 - 07:32

Are these multiple beings? Like is there one thing inside of me that's trapped in this prison? Well, the thing would be you. The thing would be me. The thing is you, but I'm presumably limited in some fundamental way. So this statement that is me is limited. So there's like 8 billion statements on the planet.

SPEAKER_02

07:32 - 07:56

There's one primary thing in animating each body. Later in Scientology, you learn there's actually like tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of like sick. unconscious half dead face and stuck to you that are now that an additional cause of problems for you sure, but fundamentally at the lower levels, the non confidential levels there's just one thing per body.

SPEAKER_00

07:56 - 09:05

I mean, it's an interesting idea. It would like to kind of explore the philosophy of that. So there's a being that's all powerful that's immortal. And its projectionist manifestation on this earth is fundamentally limited. And you're trying to, the process of Scientology is the process of letting go of those limitations. You know, that's an interesting idea. I mean, a lot of religions have this kind of idea that there's not just religions, but like we have the capacity as human beings to do, to achieve greatness in all kinds of ways. And that's the question we have with our cognitive abilities. We start with the embryo and build up into this organism. And like this world of opportunities before us, what are we capable of? And the idea that we're capable of almost anything is really powerful. And there's a lot of religions, there's a lot of philosophies, there's a lot of advice, self-help that kind of explores those ideas. And it seems like with Scientology, the application of these religious philosophy means that there's we're limited and we have to break through those limitations. And there's a process to break through those limitations.

SPEAKER_02

09:05 - 11:08

That would be correct. So what can make it challenging to adequately and completely describe Scientology in the beginning is what Scientologists believe actually changes as they progress further into or further up in Scientology. So the explanation is the I've given it is pretty consistent with what you would get at the lowest levels, right? You're a theta and I'm a theta in everyone's a theta. And we have a reactive mind. I'll run Hubbard would say the reactive mind is a collection of these recordings, mental recordings of any moments of pain and unconsciousness you've ever had in your life. It's like the subconscious mind. Uh, it's always recording in moments of pain and unconsciousness and that these are called, uh, these recordings are called El Run Hubbard called them end grams. Now, when El Run Hubbard first wrote dionetics in 1950, this was before Scientology came along a couple years later, right? So in 1950 when you wrote dionetics, it wasn't a spiritual endeavor. It was supposed to be a mental health, a science of mental health. So As of that time, the earliest end-gram you could have was the incident of birth being born, was an end-gram. And technically in dionetics, you said you could have prenatal end-grams, like when you're still in the womb. But there was no concept of past lives as of 1950 version of dionetics, right? And so the idea there was that the reactive mind is essentially a stimulus response mechanism created through evolution millions of years ago to protect the individual from things that would harm them. In other words, things that would bring about pain and unconsciousness. So you have these recordings of things that hurt you, create a pain and unconsciousness. And in present time, these things will react upon you in a way to cause you to avoid similar things, reacting upon you in a subconscious unconscious way.

SPEAKER_00

11:08 - 11:14

So the react to my protects you from the trauma that is inside your subconscious mind.

SPEAKER_02

11:14 - 11:55

Yes, and the idea is we've now as human beings of all to a state where it no longer serves us beneficially and only serves us negatively. This was Hubbard's theory. And he said, so you can get rid of these end grams by, you know, basically recalling them and going over them again and again using dionetics, auditing therapy. And if you get back to the moment of birth and erase the earliest end gram, all the other subsequent end grams on the chain would vanish. Oh, nice. So there's a chain earlier similar, earlier similar, earlier similar, earlier similar. Okay. So that gives you a pretty good understanding of how L Run Hubbard thought of the mind because that carries on has applicability later on in Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

11:55 - 12:21

I mean, that's a pretty powerful model of the mind. I mean, Freud had similar conceptions that a lot of our traumas are grounded in sort of poor formulation of sexuality or imperfect formation of sexuality, you know, childhood, something like this. and then we're trying to figure out the puzzle, whatever we formed in early childhood. It's similar. It is similar.

SPEAKER_02

12:21 - 12:35

It's probably what Herbert took it from. In the early days of the genetics before he decided psychiatry was evil. He actually credited Sigmund Freud with some of the shoulders he was standing on in writing dynamics.

SPEAKER_00

12:35 - 12:48

So he still admired psychiatry at that time. So that's an interesting moment of dynamics. So what else? You mentioned dynamics auditing was there too. So if we just before Scientology, what are the ideas that formed what we know as dynamics?

SPEAKER_02

12:49 - 13:32

As I've just described, that is the fundamental. That is pretty much the nuts and bolts of dieinetics. Was it applied? Was it applied often? Oh, yeah, that's what dieinetics in the early days was all about, was just auditing. Auditing is the process of the one-on-one counseling, recall a moment of pain and unconsciousness, run through the angriam over and over and over again, find something earlier similar. That is dieinetics auditing. One of the main things that changed with science,ology is that birth or prenatal angriams were no longer the earliest angriams on the chain. The idea is you have to get the earliest algorithm on the chain for the later ones to blow, which is a race. And so, but all of a sudden now, with the addition of an immortal spiritual being into the equation, will now the earliest incident could be trillions of years ago in other galaxies and universes.

SPEAKER_00

13:32 - 13:37

Other universes, so before the universe. Is there a model of physics integrated in any of this?

SPEAKER_02

13:37 - 14:19

No. The model is, you have the physical universe, And then above that, you have the theta universe. So we used the word theta in earlier. So in Scientology, I'll use word theta. I don't know, theta is just basically theta in power, theta is collectively. So Hubbard would say you have the theta universe, which is senior to the physical universe and creates the physical universe. And remember, I said, I said, native God like potentials. So we're not talking about the God who created the earth. We're just like scienceologists don't believe in a God, but we'll get into that later. We're talking about creating universes, like just thinking like matrix, like just when I say creating universe essentially just creating different things simulations.

SPEAKER_00

14:20 - 14:36

But it sounds like a little bit more like the ideas of Plato, which is there's these platonic forms, there's abstract forms that are bigger and more general than our particular reality here. And those forms are used to construct the reality.

SPEAKER_02

14:36 - 14:38

Well, I grew up in a cult, so I'm not familiar with the works of Plato.

SPEAKER_00

14:40 - 15:46

You can't use that as an excuse for everything. I would like to, you know, non-jokingly steal man in the case because a lot of philosophies, a lot of religions, a lot of even scientific endeavors are a little bit full of uncertainty. You can call it bullshit, but you're on on sturdy ground because we're surrounded by mystery and you have to take these ideas somewhat seriously and see where those ideas go wrong this happens with communism this happens with capitalism these ideas sound beautiful in their ideal forms and then they somehow go wrong and some go more wrong than others and so I don't think sort of it's easy to sort of caricature and make fun of the ideas. I think if we take them seriously, you start to understand like when you're in it, it was serious. It can be very convincing. The devil is going to be a charismatic person. He's not going to be a caricature or a ridiculous person. So that helps us understand which ideas will sound appealing but will become dangerous.

SPEAKER_02

15:46 - 16:08

I totally agree. In fact, it's one of the The thrusts, I have on my channel, is wanting to talk about Scientology in a way that would actually resonate with current Scientologists, not just resonate with former Scientologists. I want people who are still in to be able to hear how I talk about it and go, wow, he's being really fair and really accurate.

SPEAKER_00

16:08 - 17:45

He's not just a hater, you know what I mean? If you look at the, you know, let's take one of the worst places on earth, there's North Korea, You have Kim Jong-un. And the reality is there's a lot of citizens of that nation that deeply love the leader. because they've grew up in that way. Through fear, through all kinds of manipulation, through propaganda, and so on, they're not allowed to love members of their own family. They're not allowed to have romantic love. They're only allowed to have love for the leader. And to reach those people, you have to empathize with the fact that in their eyes, in some sense, this is a great man. This is a God, a messianic figure. You can't just make fun of The ridiculousness of the situation that is this pudgy person, while seeing Iran creating propaganda, it caused this funny haircut. With the funny haircut, it's so easy and Hitler too to make fun of, to make a caricature of the person. But this is a real person, a real person that influenced the minds of millions of people. In the case of Hitler, tens of millions of people, and created a huge amount of suffering, not because of the caricature version. But because he was a charismatic leader, he was somebody that people deeply, deeply loved. And that just over time, I mean, with the abuse of any kind of ideology, this happens over and over. And so yeah, it's interesting because Scientology is so close to the core of what is America because so many Americans are involved with it. So it's interesting to study the beauty and the power of the ideas that underlie it and where things go wrong.

SPEAKER_02

17:46 - 18:01

And I'll just say it's interesting to note you would never get a representative of the Church of Scientology to sit down and have a conversation with you and even be as fair and accurate about Scientology as I'm going to be, which is, which is not where they do you honestly deeply believe that's the case.

SPEAKER_00

18:01 - 18:34

There's not going to be a high level official that would sit down for conversation. No. I disagree with you. I hope you're right because I think that given the current dynamics of what's happening, I think in order to save from their perspective, in order to save the church of Scientology, they have to be transparent and authentic basically still men their case, but better. You would think so. What we'll talk about the other ways you could do that was just the manipulation to propaganda through control and media and all that kind of stuff.

SPEAKER_02

18:34 - 19:09

They paint themselves into a corner of not being able to send a representative out into the world to speak honestly about it because you're literally not allowed to. So when faced, you know, if you're just sitting down with an entertainment journalist of representative might be able to fudge their way through an interview, but sitting down for a long form format interview with someone who is going to ask them about Xenu and the body fatens and Lea Ramini and Lisa McPherson. That's a no-go zone. So, so I'm representing why it will never happen, but shit, I would tune in for that interview.

SPEAKER_00

19:09 - 19:14

I mean, I hope you do get someone. You don't think David Mascow is just a dolphin interview.

SPEAKER_02

19:14 - 19:15

I would love to be wrong.

SPEAKER_00

19:15 - 19:43

You know, in general journalists in these kinds of situations can be, uh, can attack. in a way that doesn't empathize and doesn't come from a place of deep knowledge and understanding. And I think it's possible to have serious conversations with people like that in an empathetic way, but it's also in a challenging way. I think there's a huge amount of trust required. And obviously for us, a very secretive organization, the amount of trust, yes, might be too much.

SPEAKER_02

19:43 - 19:56

Yeah. Anyone over there, if they've done their homework knows, you're going to be as fair as anyone in the world's going to be. And yet, They're simply things they're not allowed to talk about, and they're not even allowed to say I'm not allowed to talk about it.

SPEAKER_00

19:56 - 20:04

So that's a fundamental part of the Church of Scientology is the secrecy. So that's what you're trained as you go up through the ranks as secrecy secrecy.

SPEAKER_02

20:04 - 20:21

It's not even matter of training. It's that there's an entire the entire upper half of Scientology's bridge is simply confidential. I mean, and I never even did those levels when I was in Scientology. I didn't learn what Scientology's actually believed on those upper levels until after I get out of Scientology, now I was freaking born and raised in it.

SPEAKER_00

20:22 - 20:27

Let's go there. Let's go to a personal story. So you've spent 30 years in psychology.

SPEAKER_02

20:27 - 20:30

Yeah, I was four years old when my mom got in.

SPEAKER_00

20:30 - 20:37

And then about seven years ago, I got out. Yeah. And you're on what YouTube channel now and you're an educator.

SPEAKER_02

20:37 - 21:09

So I was four years old when my mom got introduced to Scientology. And she got in really fast, really quick. So I was 12 years old when I was taken out of school and started officially full-time working for Scientology. Okay, so in various capacities, I worked with them from the ages of 12 to the age of 26. Okay, so, and then I was 34 when I officially parted ways with Scientology. which was really more of them officially parting ways with me, but we can get in all that later. That's just kind of how Scientology doesn't.

SPEAKER_00

21:09 - 21:12

And what do you do know in terms of Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

21:12 - 21:56

So now I run growing up in Scientology, the YouTube channel, but what I primarily do is I help run an organization that helps people who are escaping from Scientology. I'm the vice president of the aftermath foundation. And we created the foundation after the television show, The Auremmany Scientology in the aftermath. and there was such an outpouring of support from non-scientologists all over the world. What can we do to help people leave scienceology that we decided to create a foundation and it's been incredibly successful. We've helped people escape from all regions and echelons of scienceology. We've accomplished what we've accomplished is far beyond what we actually envisioned would be possible. It's been a huge success.

SPEAKER_00

21:56 - 22:24

So we'll talk about the negative aspect that abuses a power, but let's just explore the ideas a little bit more. So the public facing three fundamental truths of Scientology, maybe correct me from wrong. Man is an immortal spiritual being, like we've said with Satan's experience extends well beyond a single lifetime. So infinite memory backwards. His capabilities are unlimited, even if not presently realized. The capabilities are unlimited.

SPEAKER_02

22:24 - 23:26

Yeah, so that when I say God like, I really just mean, you know, Thanos, like unlimited. Scientologists don't believe in a God. So when I say God like, I just mean the most powerful entity, the creator, the prime mover, unmoved, except we are all that. You know, a thin and indefinite in Scientology, a thin has no position in space or time. A thin does not actually exist in the physical universe. It might choose to locate itself in the physical universe, right? And then forget that it made that decision and then sort of get caught and trapped in the physical universe. But that once the thing is restored to its native powers, everything you see here in the physical universe is just a thing playing a game. Like, later, we are in a simulation right now of something. So, like, physics doesn't have to make sense when we're talking about it this way. Like, technically, you're a thing in, I'm a thing, and we're here, but this could also all just be another thing in this game. So, things all the way down. Yeah, it's just things everywhere things, it all comes down to the thing.

SPEAKER_00

23:26 - 23:39

Is there an idea of a God? Because I read there's a kind of, there is a sense of a supreme being. Is that basically the theta that's at the core at the bottom of it all? Yes, not defined, undefined.

SPEAKER_02

23:39 - 25:03

Correct. Scientology has this concept of the dynamic cell run hybrid breaks life into a different dynamics and the dynamic meaning a thrust towards survival. So he would say, you know, the first dynamic is you yourself, second dynamic is your family, third dynamic is any other group that you're a part of other than your family. Fourth dynamic is all human kind. The fifth dynamic is plant animal life, all non-human life. Sixth dynamic is the physical world, seventh dynamic is sort of like spirituality, collectively, faytons, as a statence. And the eighth dynamic, Elrun Herbert says, Scientology doesn't deal with the eighth dynamic, but we recognize that people have this idea of a supreme being. And so Scientology says you can call the eighth dynamic the supreme being dynamic, but we call it infinity. just the all-ness of everything without having to define it. And then they sort of do a little dance and they're like, science, holiday, the purpose of Scientology is to get you to the point where you have your own understandings or realizations about the nature of the eighth dynamic. We don't tell you what you have to believe about that. And technically speaking, that is true. Technically speaking, that is true. There's no point in Scientology where they state you down and say you're not required to revoke your belief in a Supreme being. It's just that everything in Scientology is inconsistent with a belief in the Supreme being. You can still find Scientologists who through cognitive dissonance will tell you they believe in a Supreme being, mostly they're lying to you.

SPEAKER_00

25:03 - 25:05

How's this inconsistent with the Supreme being?

SPEAKER_02

25:05 - 25:08

Because they didn't, because they didn't have created everything, not God.

SPEAKER_00

25:09 - 25:18

Okay. So things creative. They're also creative for us. They're not just the force that runs everything. Right. But can't those be just a fingertips of God?

SPEAKER_02

25:18 - 25:39

Sure. The only way you could reconcile a supreme being is if you say a single supreme being created. All theta. Yeah. Like the spiritual big bang. But that's not what most people think when they talk about God. They're talking about a creator of the physical universe.

SPEAKER_00

25:39 - 25:41

Yes. There's no theater.

SPEAKER_02

25:41 - 26:26

Right. I mean, even as I've described Scientology so far, none of what I've said is something I even subject to ridicule. This is pretty common sense stuff actually. I mean, if you believe in spirituality or spirits of all, there's nothing I've described so far that's crazy. Yeah. You know, believing in past lives isn't particularly unique or special. Right. The fact that Scientology does this little dance of pretending to believe in a God. I mean, it's even like a PR line. Scientology, representatives will tell you you can be a Christian and be a Scientologist. Let me tell you what. Christians don't believe in past lives and lives on other galaxies and planets and universes. They, but in Scientology knows that. Scientology knows you can't be a Christian and be a Scientologist, but they will say that. It's just an example of sort of the fundamental baked in dishonesty.

SPEAKER_00

26:26 - 26:38

because it's so important to Scientology and the organization level to have text status. I wonder, how do you, do you know the process of what it takes to prove that something as an organization is a religion?

SPEAKER_02

26:38 - 27:17

While going through that process with the IRS for the second time, by the way, Scientology actually had text exemption in the early days and the IRS pulled it and then they got it back in 1993. While going through that process again, the IRS actually took issue with the fact that Scientology was claiming you could be a Scientologist. and a member of another religion. The IRS actually said, pump the brakes there. If you're going to say that, we're going to say you're not a religion. And they actually put in writing to the IRS, no, no, no, no, that's not what we meant. That's not what we meant. We meant in the beginning you can be both, but eventually you just have to be a Scientologist.

SPEAKER_00

27:17 - 27:41

So you mentioned the eight, the eight dynamics, but you also mentioned survival. So that seems to be a core principle that human existence is about survival. Can you elaborate what is meant by survival? We're talking about the survival of the human species, survival of the individual humans, survival of the manifestation of the titans in human form. What do we, what's survival?

SPEAKER_02

27:41 - 28:04

So it would be all of that because survival is the dominant force across all the dynamics. That, I mean, Al-Ruan Hubbard, it was either dynamics or science of survival. He says he discovered the principle upon which all life exists. And that is, all life no matter what it is trying to do. Are you ready, Lex? It's trying to survive.

SPEAKER_00

28:05 - 28:32

That's pretty powerful. That's pretty powerful. Here's a bit. Here's a bit. No, I got to tell you. I got to be like, let me back in. No, I'm not. I'm not trying to get you back in. I'm trying to take you get you to take seriously the power of the ideas behind Scientology because I think those ideas are not bad ideas. They resonate with a lot of ideas throughout philosophy, throughout religions, throughout the history of human civilization. The interesting aspect is how it goes wrong.

SPEAKER_02

28:32 - 28:44

But here's the thing, like, here's the thing. It is consistent with prior efforts or studies. It's just that L. Ron Hubbard said this was a watershed breakthrough that it was being discovered for the first time. That's kind of what I'm mocking, really.

SPEAKER_00

28:44 - 28:48

Yeah. Well, you can mock Nietzsche for saying man is will to power. You can mock.

SPEAKER_02

28:48 - 28:50

It didn't claim to be the first person to ever say it.

SPEAKER_00

28:50 - 29:34

Well, Nietzsche had a bit of an ego. And he's little contradictions, but I'm pretty sure the implied thing is that he was the first to first to say yeah there's a lot of scientists there's one of the people I really admire Stephen Wolfram who wrote a book called a new kind of science that explores complex systems in cellular tomorrhage mathematical systems that have been explored before but he boldly kind of defined I am presenting to you a whole new way to look at the world and if you just set a little bit of the ego behind that aside there's actually beautiful ideas in there they have of course been done before and explored before But sometimes people declare or the coolest.

SPEAKER_02

29:34 - 29:50

That's the only thing I'm really mocking is said, this discovery that life is trying to survive is greater than the discovery of fire. Okay. I mean, it gets a little silly. But that's fine. We can agree that the fact that life is trying to survive has meaning and is meaningful and is valuable. And it's true. I mean, life is trying to survive.

SPEAKER_00

29:50 - 30:10

Also, there's a non-trivial definition of what is life here. So this idea of updating the thing that permeates through lifetimes, through people. There's some fabric that is bigger than the individual biological bags of meat. That's a philosophical initially idea. Of course, if it's not grounded in a little bit more,

SPEAKER_02

30:12 - 31:40

physical reality then it becomes a little too woo-go. And the way I'll run hybrid and Scientology defines survival is very much intertwined with how they define ethics. Ethics, anything, you know, to be ethical is pro survival, to be unethical is counter survival. But we were talking about just the concept of the dynamics, like what does survival refer to. And it actually does refer to all of them, but just keep in mind when it comes to the seventh dynamic, Thetons collectively, um, involved in here's the idea that a thing cannot die. There's no such thing as killing a thing. A thing can only can only survive. Anyway, this concept of the dynamics is one of the most fundamental and important concepts in Scientology. But because I mentioned that it also gets tied up with ethics. And this probably speaks to what you're just talking about is you can have the ideas and the concepts and you can have how do they go wrong. Because they hold that Scientology, applying Scientology, getting people into Scientology is the key to basically saving every spiritual being in existence. When you're analyzing what is ethical, it becomes whatever's good for Scientology becomes by definition ethical because anything that's good for Scientology, which is a third dynamic, is inherently good for all the dynamics. So that's where you get the end's justifying the means to do anything possible and use any means necessary to forward the aims of Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

31:40 - 32:00

That's kind of where a lot of Soviet implementation of communism went wrong. As the end's justified the means, the equality, the justice for the workers. If we have to kill murder and prison sensor in the name of that, then it's for the greater good in the long term to achieve the ideal of communism.

SPEAKER_02

32:01 - 32:37

In some respects, Scientology created a near-perfect communist experiment in its seorganization. What is it from everyone according to their ability to each according to their needs or something like that? Scientology's seorganization is damn near-perfect communist experiment. Coming from someone who doesn't necessarily know the perfect communist experiment really is because I'm not grew up in a cult like you can't use this. It's a funny tag line of using my videos. I like it. But like it is interesting that an organization that is so hypercapitalist and so money hungry and is known to be very wealthy at its core is run by these group of SEARG members that live a communist lifestyle.

SPEAKER_00

32:38 - 32:42

We're going to jump around. Let's go. What is your organization? What is this organization?

SPEAKER_02

32:42 - 33:21

This organization is the most dedicated version, the most dedicated brand of Scientologists. So there's three like echelons of Scientologists. There's public who just live normal lives in the real world and they pay to do Scientology courses and auditing. Then there's staff members who also live in the real world. But work on two and a half year contracts or five year contracts at their local Scientology organization, and then once they finished their contract there, their debt is paid or whatever. And then there's the C.org members. These are the guys who signed the billion year contracts. They don't have lives in the outside world. They don't own property. They live in Scientology provided housing. They eat Scientology run cafeterias.

SPEAKER_00

33:21 - 33:24

Is there an actual contract that says a billion years?

SPEAKER_02

33:24 - 33:33

It's symbolic, but yes. Like, no, it's not a legally enforceable contract. They haven't succeeded in forcing it in any subsequent lifetimes yet.

SPEAKER_00

33:33 - 33:42

Marriage contract should be like that. A billion years. And me, not till death to a spot, but a billion years really makes it very concrete of where you're signing up for.

SPEAKER_02

33:42 - 34:06

Yeah. Those are the billion year, guys. You hear a lot about the billion in your contract, the billion in your contract. That's the seawork. And all of science,ology, management, international management, middle management, continental management, and even some lower level service orgs are one composed 100% of seawork members. You're not allowed to marry or date someone who's not in the sea or you also not allowed to have children.

SPEAKER_00

34:06 - 34:09

With any big advice, you're going general. You're not allowed to have children.

SPEAKER_02

34:09 - 34:20

Sea or members are not allowed to have children unless they leave the sea or give you. You're expected to have an abortion and stay in the sea or because it's the greatest good for Scientology. If you accidentally get pregnant.

SPEAKER_00

34:20 - 34:23

Interesting. Because it distracts from the focus of the work.

SPEAKER_02

34:23 - 34:51

What about sexual relations only once married? But that's why people get married after like three days. Hey, you look. You look alright. Let's get married. Are you allowed to have divorce? Yeah. You get divorce a lot in the seawork. I've known people get married in three times by like by the age of 25. Oh, wow. Because in the seawork getting married is practically like dating. Right. Also unless you're married, you're living in dorms with a bunch of other people. So in order to get your own room, you also have to get married. So there's many benefits.

SPEAKER_00

34:52 - 35:07

Oh, wow. OK. So you mentioned communism in which way? Because there is a hierarchy inside C-org. Is there a redistribution of influence, position, money, power?

SPEAKER_02

35:07 - 35:29

Is that C-org? Every one in the C-org makes $50 a week. Everybody, except David and his cabbage, but, and some, some posts might have a cash bonus incentive structure, but fundamentally their pay is $50 a week. So, so even the head of a big Scientology organization is getting $50 a week.

SPEAKER_00

35:29 - 35:40

That's the celebrity's also part of seawork or not usually. So this is really the management layer. So what's the idea behind $50 a week? Is that basically live a humble life?

SPEAKER_02

35:40 - 36:01

They don't have to give you anything at all. It's just, you mean, like, what's the idea behind not paying? Yeah, basically not paying. Everything you need's already being provided for you. You're not here for the money. You're working all the time anyway. It's not like you don't have days off. I mean, you're, you're, you're working all the time. There's, there's not, there's, there's no, there's a concept of the weekends. There's no, oh, thank God, it's Friday. Friday is just another day.

SPEAKER_00

36:01 - 36:09

And how are the position to tasks, the jobs allocated within the seawork? What do you mean? Like, like, what kind of tasks you're doing, what kind of

SPEAKER_02

36:10 - 36:47

It's a very similar to just any other business as far as you can have your human resources, you can have your sales, you can have your accounting, your operations, your quality control is just that in Scientology, your operations is delivering courses and auditing. So your operations and your quality control are most of the activity occurs as far as delivering Scientology. And then you've got your, you call it business development, but that's just bringing in new members, right? So the function of a Scientology organization is very comparable to a normal business in the normal world.

SPEAKER_00

36:47 - 36:53

So let's talk about the products of this business auditing and courses. So what's auditing?

SPEAKER_02

36:53 - 36:59

So auditing is, so we described earlier, dionetics auditing. Scientology auditing is very similar to that.

SPEAKER_00

36:59 - 37:04

So at first glance, it looks like psychotherapy, a kind of therapy.

SPEAKER_02

37:04 - 38:15

All Scientology auditing is going to look like that. It's one-on-one talk therapy. You're a room by yourself, no distraction, no noise. One-on-one? Yeah. It's like this. Yeah. But, and in Scientology, they have it, what's called an emitter? Right. Almost all auditing employs the use of an emitter. What's an emitter? So an emitter is a device that just measures the resistance to a small electrical flow, except Scientologists believe that this emitter can be used to simply direct the progress of an auditing session. To determine whether the auditing has reached a good satisfactory conclusion. All auditing sessions have to end on a satisfactory conclusion. Like, that's the job of the auditor. You don't just, it's not like, sorry, the session sucks. See you next week. It's not like that. Every auditing session has to end on a positive note. And if it doesn't, there's corrections to be made. So the emitter, what does it look like visually? Like, oh, you can pull it up. Pull up Mark 8, emitter, Mark 8.

SPEAKER_00

38:15 - 38:25

So there's a few dials. There's a basic information about time, in duration, I'm presuming that a dial that just goes zero to something.

SPEAKER_02

38:25 - 38:29

Okay, so let's say that the meters in front of me and you're the one holding the cans.

SPEAKER_00

38:29 - 38:34

I'm holding the cans. You're doing the auditing of me. Yeah. Okay. I'm holding the cans.

SPEAKER_02

38:34 - 39:16

No, literally, in the beginning of an auditing session when you're calibrating the sensitivity of the emitter you do it. I can squeeze, so I squeeze the cans, please. Okay, so I'm just like squeezing. Yeah, and I'm just changing the sensitivity because when you squeeze the cans, I want to get about a one third of a dial drop on the needle. The idea is you don't want, if the needle's too sensitive, then every time you shift around in your chair, the needle's going to bounce all over the place. So you're trying to set the sensitivity of this thing. And that's all the knob there on the bottom to the left. That's the sensitivity knob. And that determines just how much how sensitive the needle is going to be. And the bigger dial is called the tone arm. And that is changing. I want to say voltage or current, but I'm not intended. I'm going to get one of those words is wrong, right?

SPEAKER_00

39:16 - 39:26

But it is a real device. It's a real device that you can actually calibrate to probably, you know, get an outcome that you want.

SPEAKER_02

39:26 - 39:46

Yeah. So here's even how just how a Scientology auditor believes it works. You're holding the cans. There's a tiny little battery in that emitter that's sending and you're completing the circuit when you pick up the cans, right? So you got a little thing going there. And that needle will respond to your physical movement. But that's not what we want. We want you to set the hell still so that we can read this thing when I'm asking you questions.

SPEAKER_00

39:47 - 39:50

Okay. So you're sitting there still, very still.

SPEAKER_02

39:50 - 39:59

As still as you can, comfortable, right? And I'm going to go, is there something you're withholding from me? And what I'm looking for is right when I say at the end of May, I'm looking for the needle to dip to the right.

SPEAKER_00

39:59 - 40:06

Having a needle, even if it's kind of random, can really be like a catalyst for a conversation.

SPEAKER_02

40:06 - 40:23

That's what it's used for, except it's an enforced conversation. So I'll give you a really good example of this. So You're holding the cans. I say, is there anything you're withholding from me? And I get an instant read. And I go, is there anything you're withholding from me? Here you go.

SPEAKER_00

40:23 - 40:25

I don't think so. And I don't see the needle.

SPEAKER_02

40:25 - 40:51

No, you don't see the needle. I go, well, what did you think of when I asked you the question? Now, if you've already had a lot of auditing, you know how this goes. It means I got an instant read and we're not going to move on until this question gets resolved. Okay, so you're going to go, I don't know how it's thinking of. And then I'm going to be like, you know, take a look and I'll help you out here. I'll try to steer you. Okay. So I'm looking to get roughly the same read while you're thinking about whatever. And what was that? What was that right there?

SPEAKER_00

40:51 - 40:54

And you can start digging to what you can start.

SPEAKER_02

40:54 - 40:56

I just want an answer to the question. Okay.

SPEAKER_00

40:56 - 40:58

And I can go to memory.

SPEAKER_02

40:58 - 44:13

Yeah. And you can give me any answer you want. There's no way for me to know if you're giving me the right answer. But I want you to give me something. Yeah. If you say you can't give me anything, I'm going to keep using the email until you give me something. Yeah. Okay. So let's say you give me something. I'm going to get all the details about that and until like time-place, form, and event, I want to know everything that happened. I want to know all the details. I'm probably not writing all this down. So I'm taking notes of everything you're telling me that it's a bad thing that you did that you haven't told me about. Okay, so I'm keeping notes. When you represent to me that you've told me everything there is to tell. I'm looking for the needle to give like a smooth back and forth motion like this. And Scientology calls out a floating needle. That means in Scientology land, we're done with that. So now I might go back to check the question. Okay, good. I'll check the question again. Is there anything you're withholding from me? Ooh, if I get another read, we've got to go through the process again. Okay. If you tell me, I've told you everything and I don't get a floating needle. I've got to go. Okay. Is there an earlier similar thing? Have you basically done an earlier similar thing? Is there an earlier similar time you haven't told someone something or is there an earlier similar thing that you did the thing that you just told me? We're going to keep going earlier similar, earlier similar, earlier similar until I get a floating needle. And that's where I'm explaining it this way you can see how no matter what the specific auditing session happens to be about, there's still the potential in any auditing session that you're going into past lives. Just because you have to go earlier similar until you get a floating needle. Okay. Now, here's how Scientologists think the emitter actually works, meaning why does the emitter work? So we talked before about these mental pictures, right? These recordings. Okay. Well, we spoke about end grams, just recordings of pain and unconsciousness. Well, Scientology would hold the bad recordings, aren't the only recordings that you have. Those are just recordings in your reactive mind. You also have an analytical mind, which is just your conscious memory. conscious recording of everything from present time to the last 76 trillion years. And Hubbard would say that these memories are actually a perfectly detailed recording. And these says like 56 perceptions or something. And that it's perfect. And you can access that information. You just have trouble doing so. Okay. So he says that these recordings, these mental pictures have actual electrical charge and mass. Now, you asked before is there any actual physics in this? I don't know. Where are you supposed to store the pictures of your last 76 trillion years that have charging mass? I don't see it. But Howard says it's there. Okay. So he says that these things have mass. And when you recall them or put attention on them, you create an electrical flow. which maybe through magnetic fields or whatever, impinges upon the electrical flow of the emitter, and it shows up as a read on the needle. That's how scientists believe that's why the needle reads. Now, synics would say the needle only reads on palm sweat and movement. Well, I know that's not true, right? I can't tell you everything the needle does read on, but I can tell you it's not just moving your hands and sweaty hands. It does correlate to thoughts probably.

SPEAKER_00

44:13 - 44:29

Some ways somehow, because if it didn't correlate to thoughts that this process would be way way too inefficient, because it would be too right there. There's going to be a bunch of people who are just not, you're not going to get the what is it called, the floating needle, like no matter what.

SPEAKER_02

44:29 - 44:36

I can't explain to you how you get a floating needle, but it sure as hell isn't hands wet, and it sure as hell isn't squeezing the cans. Right.

SPEAKER_00

44:36 - 44:57

So you eventually, most people will get to the floating needle. And some floating needles. There's like a feed, but there probably is a feedback mechanism that you are, each person realizes how they're mind and body. Yeah, because you want a resolution, right? It's probably one of your needle float for both people. Yes. And it's probably a great experience when you're like, yes, it's a gamified feeling.

SPEAKER_02

44:57 - 45:33

Well, when you're training on how to use the emitter, there are drills where you practice generating with your mind various needle reactions. So, you know, there is a drill where you sit there and you consciously try to create a floating needle by from crawling happy thoughts. Go to your happy place. And at the end of every auditing session, you actually have to go to a third party, sit down in front of an emitter and verify that your needle's floating. Every single auditing session not only has to end on a floating needle, but then you have to go to someone else and have the floating needle verified. Any Scientologist who's a seasoned recipient of auditing knows how to make their needle float at the examiner.

SPEAKER_00

45:33 - 45:48

But I got to be honest though, this process again, sorry to be sort of going that. It feels like this is a very rigorous talk therapy session. Is there good aspects to this?

SPEAKER_02

45:48 - 46:14

Sure. A lot of people find auditing very helpful. I mean, I've heard some describe it as quite thoroughly addictive. Me personally, I never enjoy getting auditing. That's probably more a function of having been raised in it. It was never something I wanted to do. Something was forced on me as a child. And also, I was never, I don't like talking about private secret stuff. You kind of have to want to be an open book. Sure. To, to honestly and thoroughly participate in an auditing session?

SPEAKER_00

46:14 - 46:17

Because there's not necessarily a belief that this is going to be private.

SPEAKER_02

46:17 - 46:27

There's no expectation of privacy, but there's no expectation that your stuff's going to be leaked for blackmail either. I mean, you kind of, you trust the people in the organization.

SPEAKER_00

46:27 - 46:32

Even despite rumors and stuff like that, but the rumors are coming from people that are lying to you, essentially.

SPEAKER_02

46:33 - 46:51

If you're a Scientologist, and you're participating in an auditing session, you know that any one in the organization has the ability to know the stuff that you saw. It's not like, oh my god, I'm only telling my auditer, because I think no one's ever going to know. You know that people know, but you also trust the organization.

SPEAKER_00

46:51 - 46:54

How quickly does it go to past memories?

SPEAKER_02

46:54 - 47:42

For people who are seasoned, like they actually like going past life. Yeah. I hated it. I would make sure I was really good at making my needle float. I didn't want to have some auditor because I never believed in the best life memories. So I don't want to be in that impossible, you know, reaching in passing and auditing session, while I was being asked for something I couldn't provide. Because I know this auditing session has to end on a good point. But Scientologists enjoy for the most part going, they call it whole track, whole track is past life. going whole track. Your time track, they've got the time track, is your whole memory, but whole track refers to anything past life. Okay. So going whole track or deep whole track with high reality, meaning it's not like, oh, I have a fuzzy memory and I'm not sure if it's real, like your real season, Scientologists are like, oh, yeah, I was on this planet and this time circling this before I was eating for breakfast.

SPEAKER_00

47:42 - 47:50

Fascinating before the origin of life on earth. So, so billions of years ago, on a distant planet where you were eating for breakfast,

SPEAKER_01

47:51 - 47:52

or other universes.

SPEAKER_00

47:52 - 48:29

I wonder if this is a nice shortcut. to sneak up to actual trauma that happened to you as a therapy device. I just, so putting scienceology aside is just, I'm thinking about as a technique for therapy, discussing basically, you know, some people have trauma and one of the things you do with therapy is like bringing the trauma to the surface that stuff that happened to you childhood. Maybe it's a more convenient thing to do to kind of map that indirectly onto a fictitious telling of what happened to you something like that trauma and a distant planet elsewhere. It could be a nice way to sneak up to it.

SPEAKER_02

48:29 - 48:44

Yeah. And it goes both flows there, not just things that have happened to you, but things that you've done. So, you know, you could be being asked for it. You know, you'd be going back to, I wiped out a civilization. I, I committed genocide. I don't know. This rice on this planet. Oh, wow. Oh, yeah.

SPEAKER_00

48:45 - 49:15

But so you can actually take on a whole new guilt. Oh, yeah. So I, okay, all right, you might actually take on a lot more guilt than I go off. Because if you feel like that self-critical aspect of the brain, boy, because my brain is really self-critical. So I could see myself manufacturing, if I was forced to over time, some kind of story where I didn't genocide a whole population of like Pluto or something. It's a distant, it's somewhere in the office in Tari. Yeah, so, I mean, you know, I walk around with that guilt.

SPEAKER_02

49:15 - 50:22

Wait, I'm actually a horrible person. So imagine though, if you had not only are you looking at, you know, someone's being self-critical, trying to identify destructive patterns of behavior in your present life, but what if you really internalize the fact that I haven't only been this way for 40 years, I've been this way for 40 trillion years. Yeah. But science,ology would argue, that as a thing, you're inherently good, all things are basically good. So the goal of the auditing procedure there would be essentially to figure out, find the moment, find what it was that caused you to make that shift as a being, to dramatize evil intentions and stuff like that. So even if you're going whole track, looking at all the horrible things you've done. The goal is to find like, well, what happened just prior to that? What was like the prior confusion? And what did you misunderstand just before that? And whatnot. So the goal is basically, so scientists have to have a lot of auditing are also convinced that they have fixed the reason for any non-optimum. conduct.

SPEAKER_00

50:22 - 51:04

And underlying this is a belief that at the core we're all good. Yes, there's a lot of really powerful ideas and Scientology, which is so interesting that it goes wrong. Yeah. Okay. What about the training you mentioned, the training of the auditor? That's really interesting. So what's how lengthy is that process? It can take years. I mean, one of that question I want to ask is, are people in seawork, like, as an auditor, do you believe everything? How much is there a crisis of faith that creeps in? Religion you have a crisis of faith when you start to wonder, like, does God even exist? So in this case, how often do you start to doubt that some of the core beliefs of Scientology are false?

SPEAKER_02

51:06 - 51:22

Scientology would say that Scientology is not about beliefs. It's about application of the techniques of Scientology auditing to improve someone's spiritual awareness and ability. So the belief level of Scientology is pretty much the stuff we've already discussed.

SPEAKER_00

51:22 - 51:23

The effectiveness of the auditing process.

SPEAKER_02

51:23 - 52:00

So the effectiveness of the auditing process, this is one of the things Hubbard says, is that standard tech, standard Scientology, they call it the tech, the technology of how to deliver auditing, standard tech, worse 100% of the time, when applied 100% correctly. Well, that's kind of unfalseifiable, right? Yeah. Because anytime it doesn't work, it wasn't applied correctly. Exactly. That's a nice little escape hatch to pull on, having a crisis of faith. It didn't work. then obviously it wasn't applied correctly. That's where quality control comes in. Their job is to nitpick and you can always find one thing that wasn't done correctly.

SPEAKER_00

52:00 - 52:10

Communism didn't work because it wasn't implemented correctly. It's always an escape hatch with ideologies. That's right.

SPEAKER_02

52:10 - 52:36

That's right. I would probably argue that auditors are not in a position of having many crisis faith because actually they're usually seeing people for the most part. improve in some ways, through the process of auditing. Now, auditing can create like a state somewhat of a euphoric state. You feel great. You're just blown out of your head, you know, you feel on top of the world. I've had that in some of my auditing.

SPEAKER_00

52:36 - 52:37

As an auditor, sorry.

SPEAKER_02

52:37 - 53:31

No, as a person receiving auditing. And so my point is as an auditor doing a lot of auditing, you're going to have someone in front of you called the pre-clear as the person in front of you who's getting the auditing called the PC or the pre-clear. They see over and over and over again, these pieces having these sort of euphoric states and floating needles. And I feel great and fantastic. No, thanks. You said in my life and I've always said, if people didn't find Scientology helpful, nobody would ever stay in Scientology. And so, auditors are pretty much the ones doing the heavy lifting of what it even means to be a Scientologist. Those guys aren't the ones that you end up having crisis of faith. I mean, doing Scientology, auditing, it doesn't require that you believe, just have faith that you believe something. You just have to go through these motions and Scientologists, one of the reasons Scientologists think this is all scientific, because it's like, I don't care if you believe why this works. I care how you feel at the end of an auditing session.

SPEAKER_00

53:31 - 54:14

And empirically speaking, like anecdotal data is it actually seems to improve people's lives within the context. So taking the outside world out of it within this particular organization. you're actually measureably seeing improvement. Is that some degree real? Because if you look at a book like Animal Farm where the pigs start to rule the other animals, and over time the life of the animals gets worse and worse and worse while the pigs keep saying that's actually getting better and better. But again, communism is the same thing. The rationing is getting worse and worse and worse, less and less food, but this constant reporting Uh, that there's more and more food where we're, we're winning hashtag.

SPEAKER_02

54:14 - 56:04

I would argue that what you've just described, it could be an identical description of what it feels like and what it means to go up Scientology's Bridge to total freedom. you are reinforcing to yourself that everything's getting better and better and better and you'd be like, you don't spend time with your family anymore. You're broke even though you make a lot of money. You're always stressed. You're at the back and call of these people who seem to run your lives. How a Scientologist feels about their own life is very interesting to compare that to how that person's life looks to their non- Scientology family members. I get contacted by a lot of people who've never been in Scientology. But they're like, I got a family member who's really deep and I just can you help me understand something? Why is this person's life like this? Why is this person's life like this? So I don't want to say that Scientologists do not actually, I don't want to say, oh, it's all in their heads. They think they're being helped, but they're really not. That doesn't feel honest. But it's this thing where if Scientology was just getting auditing. When you wanted about the subjects you wanted and you could take it or leave it, that would be fine. It's the fact that it's part and parcel to this entire organization and this entire experience. that has, as a part of that experience, taking everything from you, demanding everything from you, controlling who you can speak with, controlling who you can have relationships with, who you have to erase from your life. This is where, and it's hard to place one pinpoint on, this is where a Scientology goes wrong. It's really hard to do that because the good parts of Scientology and the bad parts of Scientology are all just Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

56:04 - 57:09

Yeah, so there's definition was bad for you and it's probably in the beginning is bad for you. This someone just sounds like a template of a toxic relationship. Yeah, there's a bunch of stuff in this world that's just not good for you. So the authoritarians as like I'm just protecting you by blocking you off from those negative things. And they're probably negative, they are probably negative things. But then this like, uh, this freedom starts closing in to where you can't no longer speak freely, think freely, act freely. And then there's some, I mean, that's why I sort of power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely that person doing the controlling. actually starts getting that like dopamine rush of the controller that's exciting. It's a vicious negative cycle. So you start out as it starts out good because you're trying to do good for the person. But then it somehow goes to shit. Yeah. So what what what are the aspects that just that are often controlled about about a person who's in psychology, especially see work?

SPEAKER_02

57:09 - 57:28

Well, Information control access to the internet access to any information critical of Scientology. Is it some internet access load? Public Scientologists has no restrictions to their access to the internet. They're just not allowed to read anything critical of Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

57:28 - 57:39

Oh, okay. So they're self. They're supposed to self control what they read or not. And what's the explanation? Is it always assumed that anything critical of Scientology is a lie?

SPEAKER_02

57:40 - 58:38

They really push this thing that unless you've been in a Scientology organization yourself, or unless you've actually been a Scientologist, you couldn't possibly know the truth about Scientology. If you're only getting information from people who aren't members or former members, then you couldn't possibly be getting the correct information. Now, they don't realize the math there doesn't make sense. If you can find out the true information by becoming and being a Scientologist, then that means You can get the correct information from a former Scientologist because they traveled that path and they got the correct information. So they still create this, they try to create this unfalse file loop where unless you are personally doing it, you don't have correct information. And you go, what about people who did personally do it? Got the correct information. Left. and are now sharing that with others. We'll know those are lies. Okay, so just anything you don't like is a lie then. Yeah, pretty much. That's kind of how it works.

SPEAKER_00

58:38 - 59:23

So what about the control of negative information on the internet? What like the actual operations? I've, you know, preparing, I should admit, I don't know too much about Scientology. I was doing a bunch of reading and the Wikipedia page on Scientology, interestingly enough, is not that negative about Scientology. So like, it made me ask, You have to be a little bit careful how you consume stuff from Wikipedia. You have to consider because money can buy things there. There's certain special interests and so on. But it made me wonder, like with a lot of controversial topics, what is true? And where do I look? Where do I go for truth? So like how much deliberate action is there to control what is true on the internet by Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

59:23 - 59:49

Well, these days, they pretty much, I think, thrown in the towel. But they have. The Scientology Middle Management was Editing Wikipedia so often for my P addresses that were traced back to the Scientology buildings that Wikipedia locked them out from any IP addresses associated with Scientology from being able to edit it. It's like the Scientology was so enfatuated with trying to control the information and in the early days of the internet they had a certain degree of success with that. It's just hopeless these days.

SPEAKER_00

59:50 - 01:00:37

The scale, the scale is not there, but actually I'm very surprised how bought forms, how effective they can be at a very small scale. If you just pay 100 people, just spread narratives. The reason that's effective is you can kind of create conspiracy theories. that create chaos and nobody knows what is true. That bot farms can do. But actually, really nicely control and narrative. It's hard. So to create chaos, it's easier to do. To basically say like, you know, do PR control is very hard. Yeah. So especially on the internet, especially when the critical eye It's there. The internet's cosmil bullshit, which is one of the really really powerful things about the internet.

SPEAKER_02

01:00:37 - 01:01:50

And I got to tell you, it's one of the reasons I do my YouTube channel. It's one of the reasons I decided to upload every day. I've uploaded every day for the last six months. I just wanted there to be a non-stop flow of information of any kind and any variety, as long as it's fair and balanced, intelligent, interesting, that Scientologist, who stumble upon the internet, will go, oh, look, someone's talking about my thing. Let's see what they got going on. And and I know this guy the fact that Scientology crushes so much information before before before like I have the only like big Scientology channel and that only got big in the last six months. Okay, so before that there were channels there was things, but it's almost like it took a lot of like People thought like it had took a lot of bravery and courage to like say something on the internet about Scientology and so people would pop up and there weren't very many voices and I was like, I want this to be prolific. I want, I want to be prolific. I want to have 30 or 40 other channels being prolific so that Scientology couldn't possibly successfully control the narrative about it. Have you been personally attacked? Erin Smithlevin.com is a website created by the Church of Scientology. Have you seen it?

SPEAKER_00

01:01:50 - 01:01:51

No, what kind of content is on there?

SPEAKER_02

01:01:52 - 01:02:16

Aaron's a abusive father and a horrible husband and the worst staff member we've ever had and I'll I openly talk about it because I think the fact that Scientology even does things like that is fucking hilarious and Anything they try to do to me. I'm the way I think about it is You know you're just giving me an opportunity to turn the mirror back on you and show everyone how horrible you are does it stick? No

SPEAKER_00

01:02:17 - 01:02:21

So you find that there is an effective, it's completely ineffective.

SPEAKER_02

01:02:21 - 01:03:13

They're so over the top and I'll tell you how the website even came into being. So I was on the first season of Lea Ramini Scientology in the aftermath. Every single person who participated in that show got a website. It's just that everyone else's website is like who is markheadly.com? Who is Mike Render.com? Well, I bought who is Aaron Smith 11.com, but I was stupid by Aaron. I didn't buy Aaron Smith 11.com. So I'm actually the only one who has a website in their name. Oh, nice. Yeah. And I'm like, Doc Call. We get a lawyer to get it back for him, but I'm like, why? I want everyone to see what a nasty, petty, disgusting organization that this is. And nobody believes anything Scientology says anyway. Does the general public know that it comes from Scientology? It says right on the bottom copyright, 2000, whatever, Church of Scientology International, like they didn't even try to hide it.

SPEAKER_00

01:03:14 - 01:03:36

Aaron Smith 11.com. Yeah, a man with no moral compass. Aaron Smith, who is he really? Aaron Smith 11, a man with no moral compass. Read about Aaron Smith 11's and angry man spreading hate from from the internet's shadows. Open mouth shot and you're saying like at the, wow, there's testimonies.

SPEAKER_02

01:03:36 - 01:03:39

Oh, there's videos from former co-workers.

SPEAKER_00

01:03:39 - 01:03:47

The slightest thing just sets him off and he just goes totally nuts. Well, that one is true. I didn't understand why he slapped me before the interview. I felt that.

SPEAKER_02

01:03:47 - 01:03:50

I got links to everyone else's website on the bottom. It's so funny.

SPEAKER_00

01:03:50 - 01:03:52

Who is? Okay.

SPEAKER_02

01:03:52 - 01:04:05

You know how many? 2020 when you're in Scientology International, all rights reserved. Here's an example of just Scientologists complete lack of self-awareness. So me and Mike Render, we went have these on like a house flip project, right? You know, Mike Render. You know, Mike Render.

SPEAKER_00

01:04:05 - 01:04:18

Do I? Bobblehead of the guy. I don't know him. I was just, I would like to talk to him about him, but this, there's a very fine gentleman here with the Bobblehead.

SPEAKER_02

01:04:18 - 01:06:08

The reason we created that the Bobblehead is because on Mike Render's hate site, Scientology created a Jeff or a GIF, how do you set what's the right way to set? The correct way is GIF, GIF, GIF, GIF, GIF. Scientology created a GIF of Mike Render as a Bobblehead. It was an insult like, oh, all he does is sit next to Leah Remedy and go, yes, Leah, and so they made a GIF of him with a Bobblehead. So we were like, we're going to make Mike Render Bobbleheads and we're going to sell him on thespshop.com to raise money for the aftermath foundation. I love it. Yeah, and now that I go out and buy Yeah, go to the screenshot.com and get yourself a microphone or Bob had no look now that my profiles getting a little higher. This head was made to bobble like this Yeah, this smooth shiny head needs its own bobble head now does I can't believe it doesn't exist so but let me show you so here's what's happening here. We just hired some day laborers off of what like Craigslist or something yeah So what Scientology did was they had a private investigator, stake out the house flip project. They were clearly running license plates of anyone who visited the property, because otherwise, how would they find out the laborers' names, look, do background checks on them, to find out they had criminal records. And they published this as if it's gonna reflect negatively on me. Oh, we hired someone to do work who had a criminal record, who gives it shit. Do you know, one of the biggest problem people with records have is finding employment. There's nothing bad about hiring someone who's got a criminal record. It doesn't reflect negatively on me, but it shows you what they think about those people. It shows you what they think about people who are trying to put their lives back together and maybe actually work for a living. And it also shows that they're surveilling us. They don't realize that putting this up, they're publishing information that they could only have if they're surveilling me and Mike. And it doesn't occur to them, maybe we shouldn't put that up.

SPEAKER_00

01:06:08 - 01:07:00

just a general process set to say of journalism where they're looking for any kind of dirt and it's trying to conjure up a story and there's something about drama and negative stories that get clicks and so on. So this is a general process. Especially the more celebrity you become, the more these kinds of attacks come and they look for any kind of thing that could be, you know, it doesn't even have to be facts. It could be Just asking who is he really? Seems to have traction on the internet. What is the actual truth of the man you keep claiming you are, of the good man you keep claiming you are? It's fascinating. But sometimes that can be effective. But I think if you're being transparent and authentic and just putting yourself out there completely in their story completely, then that's the best way to fight it.

SPEAKER_02

01:07:00 - 01:07:15

That's the other reason to be prolific on the internet, right? The reason Joe Rogan can't get canceled. is because anyone can watch thousands of hours of the authentic Joe Rogan. You can't miss representing, because he spent thousands of hours representing himself genuinely.

SPEAKER_00

01:07:15 - 01:07:37

Yeah. The nice thing when you're representing yourself genuinely, you should be a good person. If you're a good person, then the internet will know. You can smell out the bullshit. Who is David from Scourge? It's even like, because you said Elvarn Howard founded Scientology. Let's go to the story of how we transitioned from that to Doom's cabbage.

SPEAKER_02

01:07:37 - 01:07:45

The current leader of Scientology. He was actually not selected by Al-Ranhubber to take over, but ended up you serving power and taking over.

SPEAKER_00

01:07:45 - 01:08:00

It sounds like Stalin and Trotsky. There's some similar story. It's the person oftentimes in the situation Uh, it's not the natural successor to power. It's the one that takes power.

SPEAKER_02

01:08:00 - 01:10:44

Right. I think the quote sometime it gets attributed to David Miscavages. I'm power. Power is not given. It is assumed. Yeah. Something like that. The last six years of Albert's life, he was often as seclusion, essentially hiding from lawsuits. Now, by the time, Hubbard went off into seclusion, Miscavich had sort of already risen up through the ranks of the Sea Organization. Now, Miscavich was like a teenager, either like 11, 12, 13 or something like that. Miscavich was not born into Scientology, but he was a young boy when his father got into Scientology. So, Miscavich did start working as a Sea Org member. So, there's one organization that existed to essentially serve Hubbard directly. and to represent his interest, and that was called the Commodore, he was the Commodore of the Sea Organization, the Commodore's Messengers Organization, we're going to call it the CMO. Miscavage started working for the CMO pretty early on in his C-org career. By the way, as did Mike Render. He just became known as a doer, like a guy who'll get it done. No excuses, no stops, you know, get it done. So, he had made a name for himself in the CMO. around the time. By the time, we're off into seclusion. Now, when he went off into seclusion, he took two other CMO, or I'm going to call him messengers, right? Commodore's messengers. He took two other messengers with him, patting any broker. Now, it has been said by people, Mike, Mike Rinder has told me. He goes, the reason patting anyone off with our age isn't necessarily because he desperately wanted them to, but partly because we could afford to let them go. We didn't necessarily need them. Sure. Okay. And between the two of them, Annie was the one who was like a really compassionate person. intelligent person, caring person, was there a possible trajectory of this world where she was the one that took over? Yes. In fact, Pat and Annie Broker were the two people that were supposed to take over. Okay, but because Pat and Annie were with Hubbard in seclusion, basically had the complete run of the operation without any oversight from Hubbard. The only way any information would get from Scientology World to Hubbard is misgavage and Pat Broker would meet at a confidential location. And misgavage would give Broker any information he wanted to go to LRH. So if misgavage wanted to get rid of somebody, all he had to do was feed LRH false information that this person was doing had been caught doing something treasonous. And then he would get in response some order from L Run Hubbard to get rid of this person. So are there so many similarities between various communist regimes and fascist regimes?

SPEAKER_00

01:10:44 - 01:11:22

Well, here they're the same thing when he became a supreme leader. He had to take power. Yeah, he had to wait for the president to die, but the whole time there's a control of information and a slow aggregation of power. Of course, with nations is different because if you control the military, you control a lot. So there's you have to also get the generals and your side and so on. But I'm sure in this situation, there is similar kind of dynamics you have to get certain people in your side control the flow of information let the original founder the original leader die off yeah and make sure that you are the one that's left with the power right so whereas patent any or off with LRH

SPEAKER_02

01:11:23 - 01:12:48

all of Scientology's attorneys and accountants and lobbyists and whatever, they all know Dave. Dave's the one they deal with. So, you know, LRH passes away, patent any make this appearance. Nobody knows patent any. Everybody knows Dave. And so he ended up getting rid of patent any. This is a very short, perhaps slightly bastardized version of it, of miscavage basically. They had been, they had been ushering just suit cases of cash. to all run Hubbard during this time. And, you know, like, so you have misgabbage handing, but loads of cash to Pat Broker. Pat would do crazy things like hide the money in the walls of houses and dig pits and everything. So, a misgabbage basically threatened to turn Pat Broker over to the IRS for tax evasion. That's pet broker still alive. Is he a Scientologist or not? No. He basically went away and kept out and he shot. She died a handful of years ago. She stayed a loyal C. York member until the very end. But literally, like the misgavitch put her on menial tasks like Like, she had no authority whatsoever. She was just put on menial tasks. I mean, the washing dish has been not really groundskeeper. Just just stupid low level assistant paper push your stuff. She never, but she never operated with any actual authority. Even though she was supposed to be the one to take over her impact.

SPEAKER_00

01:12:48 - 01:12:59

So on David Mascavage, difficult question, but Gemic, both the case that he is a good man who's misunderstood and the case that he's not a good man.

SPEAKER_02

01:13:01 - 01:13:05

First of all, I believe that misgavage is a true believer in Scientology. I do believe that.

SPEAKER_00

01:13:05 - 01:13:10

That's a really important question. Do you think he believes in all the things and all of that?

SPEAKER_02

01:13:10 - 01:15:23

He definitely believes in that. I think he believes in Scientology but in a different way than all other Scientologists because he's aware of a lot more. Information, damaging information about El Run Hubbard and the true story of Scientology that most people. So his version of belief is different. I'll give you one example here. So Scientology's bridge to total freedom goes up to what they call OTA's operating theme level eight. Okay. Scientologists have often told that El Run Hubbard before he passed finished, completed, putting together OTA 910, 1112, 1314 and 15. It's just sitting in the vault, waiting to be released. This is part of the Scientology belief system, because remember, I said, going up Scientology's bridge or told a freedom is how you're supposed to get back to your native God-like state. While all the Scientologists in the world have already done OTA know that they haven't gotten there, but they still believe in Scientology because they're told there's more. But wait, there's more. Miscafich knows there is no more. So, miscafich knows the fundamental promise of being able to achieve full operating theta is a lie. He knows L Run Hubbard did and accomplished that. So therefore, no one else is going to accomplish it as well. If L Run Hubbard had accomplished it, misgavage knows, well, he didn't write it up. He didn't leave instructions for how anyone else would accomplish it. So no matter what, misgavage knows that the fundamental promise that what Scientology is saying, they will be able to deliver two mankind is a lie. Now it's going to sound like I'm contradicting myself, because it sounds like I'm saying, well, he knows it's bullshit. I think he believes that Elron Hubbard just failed to finish his work. and he's kind of hoping Al-Rainhubber is going to come back to finish the job. Because Al-Rainhubber did tell the people at international, the international management base, at least a core of them, that he was coming back. Now, we know that David Miscavich believed this because right around the 21-year mark, he was supposed to come back like 21 years after he died. Right around the 21-year mark, David Miscavich was getting busy putting some things in place that had to get done in case Al-Rainhubber came back. So we know he at least believed to that level.

SPEAKER_00

01:15:23 - 01:15:48

do you believe that like uh... around how broken sort of enter his own body no that's not how it works in Scientology okay so you can't have a transfer of things if you were full of tea you could can you uh... describe the OT against the OT level's OT one two three four five to the eight what uh... what are they what's how do you get to level one i'm gonna answer the question by first connect in some dots yes okay

SPEAKER_02

01:15:50 - 01:17:15

We spoke early in the interview about achieving your native godlike state. That in Scientology is called native state. Okay, native state and full operating theta means the exact same thing. Okay, because at native state, you are a fully operating theta, you know, operating meaning, operating your full capacity. So OT means operating thing. So the upper confidential half of Scientology's bridge are called the OT levels, the operating thing in levels. and these, and remember, they're confidential. So most Scientologists have not done these levels. They don't know what's on them. It is on these levels that you learn about the Xenu and the Body Thaiton story. Can you describe Xenu please? We spoke earlier about how at the lower non-confidential levels of Scientology's bridge, Hubbard is saying that what's wrong with you is your reactive mind. Yes. Okay. Well, in Scientology, once you've gotten rid of your reactive mind, that is what's called the state of clear. OK, so after you finish state of clear, the next thing on the bridge is the OT levels. Well, if you've already gotten rid of your active mind, what the heck are you supposed to do now? Well, now Elrun Hubbard says, okay, first, what was wrong with you was just your reactive mind. But now the next thing you have to resolve, the next thing that's wrong with you, is you actually have tens of thousands of fatens stuck to your body, and they all have their own reactive minds. You have to audit the fatens.

SPEAKER_00

01:17:19 - 01:17:27

How do you audit the things? These are different shades of your inner mind and you just have to try to access them somehow.

SPEAKER_02

01:17:27 - 01:18:04

You use the emitter, just like we spoke about except now you've got a divider that separates the can so they don't short-circuit and you hold both cans in one hand and you have the emitter in front of you so now you're auditing yourself. You're telepathically talking to the things that are stuck to you. You are thinking the commands instead of saying them out loud and you sort of do drills where you practice looking for emitter reads at the instant you have a thought. You're telepathically auditing spirits that Elburn Hubbard says are stuck to your body. Does this sound like a recipe for a mental breakdown?

SPEAKER_00

01:18:04 - 01:18:13

Or a heck of a mental journey. Wherever that leads, it could lead anywhere. It probably lead to a very bad place, right? Very often does.

SPEAKER_02

01:18:15 - 01:19:50

and you combine that with the fact that Scientology is against any forms of mental health or health outside of Scientology and you have a recipe for disaster. Now, you might go, where did all these spirits come from that or stuck to your body? This is where Xenu comes into play. So Hubbard says that 75 million years ago, Xenu was basically a dictator at The Galactic Confederation is like 70 something or 80 something planets somewhere in the Milky Way and Xenu was like a dictator and overlord for either one of these planets or the whole system and they had a population problem. And Xenu was like, we need to get rid of like half the people. So we called them all in for tax audits. Albert didn't like the IRS, so of course the story has to do with tax audits. Okay, called them all in for tax audits, said psych bitches, froze them and gly call, loaded them up on space planes, flew them to earth. Remember the story has to be earth because the story is what's wrong with us. flew them to earth, dropped them in volcanoes, blew them up with hydrogen bombs. and then captured them with like spirit magnets I'm making upwards because okay. And these disembodied spirits of these people that got blown up have just been blown in the wind here on earth and they attach themselves to things and they can be in the environment and they stick to bodies and everything. And so and they'll have reactive minds. So at Scientology's upper levels, if you get sick or you have cancer or there's something wrong with you, Scientology will say, That's one of your body things. You need to get some auditing to fix the body things.

SPEAKER_00

01:19:50 - 01:20:03

So this story, uh, you do it with a kind of bit of a chuckle, but when done seriously, so it's just told in a serious way, like to like, or written down. It's written down. You read it.

SPEAKER_02

01:20:03 - 01:20:30

By most accounts, Scientologists struggle when they read this for the first time because this is not consistent with what Scientologists are hoping for is on the RT levels. They're hoping for some real life-changing magic. The way these things are described and sold there, Remember, they're hoping that these Otsi levels are going to make them give them the ability to go like completely independent of their body at will. Yeah, exterior ice from your body, go back into your body, you know, like, I have some real spirit powers.

SPEAKER_00

01:20:30 - 01:20:41

The first is kind of a shock. This is, but then you still probably believe you hope. Yeah, and you might turn it on yourself. Self-critical that this is I'm just not strong enough yet.

SPEAKER_02

01:20:42 - 01:22:02

Yeah, because also part of the Scientology member, it works 100% of the time when used 100% correctly. And if it doesn't, it could be because something's not being done, right? But it also could be because you're doing bad things that you're not telling people about. Like, if you're committing present time over its crimes, sins, Scientologists would be like, that's part of the reason auditing isn't working on you, is because you're committing criminal behavior that you're not being honest about. So every Scientologist is sort of incentivized to make auditing work on them. Now, let's just work as little crazy. On OT3, you learn about the body things for the first time. When you finish OT3, you attest to having achieved the state of having no more body things. And then you start OT4. And he's like, psych, you got more, you got more BTs, except those other BTs, they had drug problems and that's why you couldn't find it in the first time. So we're going to do a little some little different here, just a little different there, got to get rid of these BTs that were addicted to drugs. Okay, then you finish out to you for and you're thinking, man, I hope you get to the good stuff soon. And then you get to OT-5 and he's like, sake, you got more BTs. You couldn't find these BTs because they were all bunched up together in clusters. And first you have to break up the clusters and then you can get rid of the BTs and you're like, okay, gotta do that.

SPEAKER_00

01:22:02 - 01:22:04

And this was all on Hubbard approved.

SPEAKER_02

01:22:05 - 01:23:37

Yeah, this is from L-Round Hubbard. And then after you finish out T5, you get rid of all the BT clusters, OT6 is just a training course to teach how to auto OT7. Well, OT7 is now more BTs, except it's in the environment stuff. You're trying to locate BTs. You can find them on your body, but it's just more BTs. Okay. And then OT8 is, remember we talked about in all these auditing sessions throughout the entire Scientology Bridge. You have people who've run hundreds or thousands of past life, whole-track incidents. These memories have become part of their self-identity of who they even think they are. O-T-8, you go through all these past life recalls, and essentially I'm oversimplifying this a little bit. He goes, psych all those past life memories weren't yours. They were your BT's. And he goes, now that you've discovered this, now you know who you are not. and you are ready to find out who you really are. Do we know they don't exist? Yes. In fact, the whole story of how that became known is part of how David Miscavich was able to get rid of Pat Broker and take over power because it was believed that Pat Broker had been wasn't possession of the upper unreleased OT levels. And when Miscavich determined that he was not and there weren't in fact any levels, that was bad. That was a bad day to be David Miscavich, because he now knew he had something on his hands so he could not get himself out of his legs.

SPEAKER_00

01:23:37 - 01:23:44

So there's no gap. for faith to seepin' that there is a level nine and 10, 11 and 12.

SPEAKER_02

01:23:44 - 01:24:11

Oh, the faith is there. Scientists all just believe that these things do exist. Yeah. I'll run, however, didn't leave anything behind. Does David and the scavenger believe they exist? Oh, no, he knows, he knows they don't exist. I mean, when I say exist, oh, I don't mean do advanced levels of spiritual awareness exist. When I said this, I mean, did El Run Hubbard write down what anyone is supposed to do. Yeah, that's called OT9. That doesn't exist.

SPEAKER_00

01:24:11 - 01:24:25

So you're saying, dear, Ms. Howard, you believe that they can be written down, so they exist sort of in a platonic sense. And Alvahn Hubbard is the only one that can write it down. So his face is really deep.

SPEAKER_02

01:24:25 - 01:24:29

Oh, you mean on his face that only Alvahn Hubbard could have ever been the one to do it?

SPEAKER_00

01:24:29 - 01:24:36

The full principles, beliefs of Scientology. He is, do you have, are you sure he believes that?

SPEAKER_01

01:24:36 - 01:24:37

What exactly?

SPEAKER_00

01:24:38 - 01:24:41

everything about Scientologies that is true.

SPEAKER_02

01:24:41 - 01:25:25

So the best of my ability to know that I believe it to be true. Like I'll give you some all-leave and stupid examples. Like Mike Render's told a story where at the International Base, misgavage actually had like a copper contraption built into the ground, like grounded into the ground to come out where you could hold it and hear something he sort of came up with to your beat, your, it could ground your BTs. could get your BTs that if you're feeling over-estimulated or something, I'm probably slightly bastardizing this story. But he came up with this as a great idea, something to help someone de-stimulate if their BTs were getting a little too interactive. Now, so that's a stupid story that's sort of like, well, it shows you he believes in the concept of a BTs of his creating little rods to get rid of them to ground them into the earth.

SPEAKER_00

01:25:26 - 01:26:36

He could be conjuring up the stories because he understands the power of myth and narrative and so on to inspire. But also if we look at history, both with this interesting thing, because I've been reading a lot about Hitler and Stalin, and it seems like both of them in different ways believed in the stories they were telling. Even when the stories, this is the fascinating, especially with Hitler and propaganda, where they were literally conjured up at first. But then you start to believe you're in propaganda. We're stalling, I think, what he always believed is the bigger ideal of pure communism. And anything justifies the journey to communism, because it will ultimately be good for humanity to achieve the state of pure communism. And then he's a god-like figure they can make. can bring humanity there. But like Hitler is interesting because like this constant propaganda that he knows is not true. a little bit, it's got to be doubt, but then he like that all dialed is removed very quickly. Yeah. I guess humans are just, this is how they operate.

SPEAKER_02

01:26:36 - 01:27:19

Yeah. The conversation about David Miscavers gets really interesting because I could give you a, if I wanted to make the argument that he didn't believe, I could give you a dozen examples to make that argument. I just happen to think that he believes in a different way, whereas your average Scientologist, believes that Alvaran Hubbard was practically infallible, that he thought of everything in advance, he took care of everything before he left, and miscavage still believes in like the main structure of this thing, but he's like, oh, shit. It's falling to me to figure out how to actually make this thing happen. I think miscavage sees himself as someone who has to assert and agree how to go back and fix Alvaran Hubbard's mistakes.

SPEAKER_00

01:27:19 - 01:27:25

Do you think he sees himself as doing good for the world? I do. What about for the people of Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

01:27:26 - 01:28:03

I think in his own way he does. I don't think he wakes up thinking he's screwing Scientologists. I think he sees everyone else is screwing him. I think he sees that it is his job to expand Scientology throughout the world and accomplish the aims of Scientology and he sees that it's not happening and he thinks if everyone else would just stop, if everyone else would get out of his way and stop creating problems for him it would happen. I do think he seems to see himself as someone who is doing good. I think that's fair to say. I think the evidence shows that.

SPEAKER_00

01:28:03 - 01:28:09

What about the effects of clearly power and influence that he said in money?

SPEAKER_02

01:28:09 - 01:28:12

Yeah, without question that is served as a corrupting force.

SPEAKER_00

01:28:12 - 01:28:16

It has without question. Have you seen sort of evidence of that that he's changed over time?

SPEAKER_02

01:28:16 - 01:28:33

After the 1993 IRS exemption that Scientology won back, and this information comes from my grinder. That's when David Misgavich, as soon as the checks on his power were removed, Misgavich's behavior changed, markedly.

SPEAKER_00

01:28:34 - 01:28:39

Can you tell the story of Shelley misgavage and the mischief surrounding her? I saw that there is quite a bit of mystery.

SPEAKER_02

01:28:39 - 01:29:12

Yeah. So Shelley misgavage for many years held the job of her post in this organization was David misgavage's assistant. That was her post. It's important to truly understand that and what that means because the fact that she was misgavage's wife is meaningless. And this is something that's hard to, for reggae people in the regular world to truly grasp how meaningless it is in Scientology. For C.org members who are spouses, it means nothing.

SPEAKER_00

01:29:12 - 01:29:14

Do you roll matters more?

SPEAKER_02

01:29:14 - 01:30:37

You roll the only thing that matters. So, let's say, let's say Shelley was married a day, but she worked in a different organization. She would never be seen with him ever, publicly ever. Wouldn't travel with him, wouldn't go to events with him, nothing. Some time around, 2006 to 2007, and I'm very oversimplifying this. Okay, Shelley basically pissed off Dave to the point where he's like, okay, I'm done with you. I'm gonna take you off of your post. Okay. At that point, she was reassigned to another confidential Scientology base up in Twin Peaks, California. Why am I, the reason I'm providing this type of detail is because we hear that Shelley's missing. Okay. Well, you realize the same people who report that Shelley's mentioning are also the same people who will tell you exactly where she is. Okay. She works at this secretive CST, Church of Spiritual Technology based out in Twin Peaks, California. I have personal confirmation that she was seen and spoken with by someone who knew her well in, I'll say, 2019. Shelley misgabbage is missing in the sense that She hasn't been seen with David Miscavich since about 2006. But because she's no longer his assistant, you would never see her with him.

SPEAKER_00

01:30:37 - 01:30:45

As opposed to like the mystery of a person that might be murdered, this is more of a reallocation within the organization.

SPEAKER_02

01:30:45 - 01:31:24

Certain people who cover Scientology, who have published stories, where Shelley's Miscavich's family member told a story to another family member who told the story to a friend who told the story to a former Scientologist who told the story to a journalist who published the story. Has created the impression that some of Shelley misgavaged his family members are actually talking to the press. When in fact that is never occurred. And so the very people who are publishing about Shelley misgavaged missing have contributed to the fact that Shelley misgavaged does no longer speak to those family members because she thinks they're talking to the press when they never have. It's pretty messed up.

SPEAKER_00

01:31:24 - 01:31:34

It's sad that she, because those, those family members would be away for her to, to cover to, to flourish as a human being to escape.

SPEAKER_02

01:31:34 - 01:32:26

Yeah. So I believe the information that I have that I verified, I'm, I'm, I'm putting out, I'm the one representing it's true without revealing my sources. True. That Shelley was still actively in touch regularly with family members outside of the Sea organization since about until about 2014. So I mean regularly. Okay. So there's no question about her safety during that period. And then someone else who knew Shelley very well did see her and actually have a conversation with her in a public place in 2019 or 2020. Not somebody could still come along and be like, how do we know she's okay? It's been three years. Yeah, okay. You could say that about anybody. You know, there's the nature of working in the highest levels of science,ology, management at these super secretive bases. It's a very weird and unique situation. It has isolation baked in.

SPEAKER_00

01:32:26 - 01:32:39

How secrecy enforced? Why is everybody holding on to their stories so hard? So intensely. People that are within the organization, like it's hard to leak. information.

SPEAKER_02

01:32:39 - 01:32:57

Oh, they wouldn't run out like their true believers. They see. They see like there's a sort of a conspiracy theory that runs right through all of Scientology. which is that Scientology represents like an existential threat to the powers that really control, that really control this planet.

SPEAKER_00

01:32:57 - 01:33:08

Do they have a face to the powers that really control, do they have names to it, a cruise controlling? It's Z-News homies. Well, I'm sure that's not what they say. Z-News.

SPEAKER_02

01:33:08 - 01:33:20

It's actually sort of a multifaceted conspiracy. And that on the one hand, I'll run Hubbard points as fingers that like the international bankers. Okay, which has shades of anti-Semitism too.

SPEAKER_00

01:33:20 - 01:33:24

And then the IRS is going to be quickly baked in or not.

SPEAKER_02

01:33:24 - 01:33:54

The IRS now, the IRS is so low on the totem pole. As far as the, I mean, the international bankers, he would say, runs everything. Got it. But use that that these bankers also use big pharma and big psych. to control the population and Scientology is famously against Pharma and Psych. And so this is sort of how Elvron Herbert characterizes like this big war between Scientology that's trying to set everyone free and big Pharma and Big Psych that's trying to enslave everyone on the planet.

SPEAKER_00

01:33:54 - 01:33:59

Yeah, controlling their mind, controlling their body through chemicals and who controls the press.

SPEAKER_02

01:34:00 - 01:34:56

big farm and big site so that there's a lot of correlation to other kinds of conspiracy theory yeah uh... it's fascinating but you ask the question um... where uh... why would all these people hold on to their stories they don't they would never want to leak like by even anyone who would want to leak would not not even want to be a Scientologist anymore. Like if you truly believe if you truly believe in Scientology and you got your shoulder to the wheel and your Seeric member, you think Scientology is literally the only thing that can save every being on this planet from a fate of eternal amnesia and slavery. Right? And so it's like, I mean, you see the matrix, right? So you've got everyone once you're unplugged from the matrix and you realized, yeah, you can get plugged back in and live your nice life, but you're a slave. That's how Scientologists see this planet. Actually, they refer to Earth as a prison planet.

SPEAKER_00

01:34:56 - 01:35:06

Just an individual level. How is it possible to reach a person like that? Is there something you could say to that? Like, what's the journey of reaching a person like that?

SPEAKER_02

01:35:07 - 01:36:10

I personally, because when I was in those shoes, I say there's nothing anybody could have said to me to get me to change how I felt and thought about Scientology. It's almost foolproof that the more evidence you try to present that there's something wrong with what Scientology is doing, the more you're just working for the psychs. It's very, very difficult. I mean, most people who leave Scientology leave because they have had some personal experience that was just such a grave injustice that had just pushed them beyond the point of what they were willing to experience. I'm not sure I've really ever heard a story of someone going, yeah, I just woke up, you know, I just graduated realized it was all BS and drifted away. You know, it's usually like, no, I really believed and they treated me so horrible. I almost had no choice, but to leave. And then the stories get pretty crazy.

SPEAKER_00

01:36:10 - 01:36:15

Meaning you don't care what's true anymore. You just have to leave. Yeah. This is the, the unpleasant feeling of the suffering.

SPEAKER_02

01:36:15 - 01:36:55

Yeah. And this sort of goes back to the conversation we're having about like, well, does miscavage really believe. And I said, I could make an argument for the fact that he doesn't, right? Because I go, it wouldn't be that hard to change the way Scientology treats people just a little bit. And you'd probably stop losing anyone because Scientologists already believe to such a strong degree. You have to be pretty freaking horrible to people to make him leave. And that's where you go. Well, does Miscavich even want Scientology to expand? Because if he was really being clever about it, it seems like he could at least stop the bleeding and yet he doesn't. So that's where you make the argument. Well, if he doesn't, then he must not want to.

SPEAKER_00

01:36:55 - 01:37:01

So his mind is corrupted to the point where he's not able to actually be a good businessman, essentially.

SPEAKER_02

01:37:01 - 01:37:09

It seems that way. The numbers of Scientologists have been going down and down and down since the early 90s.

SPEAKER_00

01:37:09 - 01:37:19

Is there a good, I mean, it's very difficult to get to this number, but is there a good estimate of what the current number of Scientologists are practicing Scientologists?

SPEAKER_02

01:37:19 - 01:37:29

Oh, yeah. I did a video about this. It's actually quite easy to get to the number. It's not more than 35,000 in the entire world. And that's being very generous and charitable. That's, I was intentionally generous. I broke it all down and spreadsheet and everything.

SPEAKER_00

01:37:30 - 01:37:33

You know what, can you give like some insights of how you get that info?

SPEAKER_02

01:37:33 - 01:38:14

Sure. There's about 175 to 200 Scientology organizations in the world. Anybody who's ever worked at these organizations know there's not more than 35 to 50 staff members per org. There's not more than one to 200 public Scientologists per org. I broke down the number of seeric members who'd be working at every continental management unit, middle management, international management. I broke down the mission network and I was generous. I mean, my numbers were like, if L-RON Hubbard came back and they were doing an event, L-RON Hubbard was coming back and announcing O-T-9 in 10, how many Scientologists could we scrape together in every city to come to this event? It wasn't more than 35,000. Now, contrast that to what Scientology says.

SPEAKER_00

01:38:16 - 01:38:45

Millions ten million people is this less people than they're used to be yeah at its peak it was about a hundred thousand active members but never the millions ever no has David Mascavich used the violence has there in your understanding of it in your estimation sort of harassment assault and actual I don't know how to define a salt but violence.

SPEAKER_02

01:38:45 - 01:39:03

Oh, yeah. Dozens of former Sierra members from the international base have told stories of being assaulted by misgavison. In fact, Mike Rinder is probably the one person who's been assaulted by misgavison more than anyone else. He's personally probably even assaulted dozens of times. Who's Mike Rinder?

SPEAKER_00

01:39:03 - 01:39:04

So man here.

SPEAKER_02

01:39:04 - 01:39:10

One of the highest ranking executives in scienceology. He was author. There you go, a billion years.

SPEAKER_00

01:39:10 - 01:39:11

A billion years.

SPEAKER_02

01:39:12 - 01:39:22

It's, uh, it really is a fantastic book, because it's the guy that I was born and raised in Scientology and worked personally with Al-Ron Hubbard and worked personally with David Miscavich for decades. It's like, doesn't get much more insider than that.

SPEAKER_00

01:39:22 - 01:39:35

I candid and deeply felt my more of a life lost to false belief and courageously regained Lawrence Wright. A billion years, my escape from a life in the highest ranks of Scientology in my career.

SPEAKER_02

01:39:36 - 01:40:20

It's a fantastic book. He also narrates his own audiobook, too. I know you like the audiobooks. That's how I listen to him. So Mike famously, you know, I just said a moment ago, like someone has treated so horribly, even though he's still believed in Scientology, he had no choice but to leave. And he tells the story in that book, and he still believed in Scientology for years after he escaped. For years, because there's this thing called the independent Scientology movement or the free zone, whatever there are people who do Scientology outside of the Church of Scientology. There's just not many of them. But Mike was one of those people who has actually doing Scientology even after he left. Now he no longer believes in that anymore and he doesn't do it. But even though he still believed, even though everything he knew was what he was leaving behind. He still had to leave it behind.

SPEAKER_00

01:40:21 - 01:40:54

And by the way, I just threw open to random pages and he says, when I signed on for seawork in Adelaide in 1973, the recruiter promised I would train as a Scientology executive under the direct tutelage of Hubbard on the Apollo. So this is another thing I should probably ask you about this. We can go for days. I was also told that after I learned all I needed to learn at the foot of the master, I would return to Australia to help expand Scientology in my home country. So what was the thing that really broke him?

SPEAKER_02

01:40:54 - 01:42:34

The final thing is when he got to a point where he was no longer being forced to lie to protect El Run Hubbard. he was now being forced to lie to protect David misgavage. And specifically, it was about the allegations of having been assaulted by misgavage. Mike Render was at some event. I might have been a grand opening for a building, a Scientology Building in London. And I believe it was John Sweeney, at that time at BBC Journalist, who stuck a camera in a microphone in my face. Is it true David misgavage assaulted? Is it true? And Mike denied it on camera. And then turned around and to himself is like, This is what my life has been reduced to, lying to protect David Miscavich. This used to be about L. Ron Hubbard. This used to be about Scientology. Now it's about protecting this douchebag. And Miscavich had just issued orders. that was going to send Mike off to Australia. Muscat, like, Muscavich is sadistic. That is, that is without question. So just like meaning, he enjoys inflating pain upon others. So he very specifically was going to tell Mike, tell Render or tell that cock sucker. We're shipping him off to Australia. He's never going to see his wife and his kids again, essentially. And that's when Mike was like, they were the only reason I hadn't already left. Yeah. So if I follow the orders, I'm going to lose him. If I leave Scientology, I'm going to lose him. But at least if I leave Scientology, I'll be free of something. It's fucking sad.

SPEAKER_00

01:42:34 - 01:42:44

And he still believed Scientology to some degree after he left. Yeah. Has he spoken about what it took to let go of believing Scientology? Yeah.

SPEAKER_02

01:42:44 - 01:43:14

He does a very good job talking about all this in the book. And it took him, it took him like four or five years to get that book done, like it's a polished version, it's a polished version of a story. And I think Mike's about getting ready to start his own YouTube channel, so that'll be a lot of fun. Actually, Mike comes on my channel all the time. Yeah, you guys, you guys do a thing together, right? Yeah, we do three of me goes with me and Mike Rinder and Mark Adley. That's why I gave you Mark's books. I thought maybe you would know him from our little three of me goes our Mondays with Mike and Mark videos.

SPEAKER_00

01:43:14 - 01:43:20

Mark hadly blown for good behind the eye and curtain of Scientology.

SPEAKER_02

01:43:20 - 01:43:26

So he escaped from the international base on a motorcycle. It's a wild story. I won't even try to do it justice.

SPEAKER_00

01:43:26 - 01:43:28

Who's the better writer of the two of them?

SPEAKER_02

01:43:29 - 01:43:31

You're not going to get me there, like.

SPEAKER_00

01:43:31 - 01:43:33

I'm trying to be investigative journalist.

SPEAKER_02

01:43:33 - 01:43:53

Mike and Mark are both on the board of the aftermath foundation. Who's better looking? No. It's one of my justifications for just putting up content every day as every video is just an excuse to in some little way promote the aftermath foundation. And I do that again, one to genuinely help people escape. And two, because I know it drives David Miscavich crazy.

SPEAKER_00

01:43:53 - 01:43:57

If you look in your own heart, is there anger there?

SPEAKER_02

01:43:57 - 01:44:05

I don't think it's anger. I don't hate, I don't hate Scientology. I don't hate David Miscavich. I don't even hate my experience in Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

01:44:08 - 01:44:10

Yeah, from your experience.

SPEAKER_02

01:44:10 - 01:44:30

Yeah, absolutely. But it's also the only path that I traveled. So I tend, no, I'm okay, a little less of these days, but earlier in life, I tended to attribute all my positive characteristics in me to Scientology, because in my simplistic way of thinking, I was like, what else could it possibly be attributed to? That's a very black and white way of saying.

SPEAKER_00

01:44:30 - 01:44:47

That's a beautiful way to see life. No matter what happens to you, you attribute, like you focus on the positive. Yeah. And you feel like it's sometimes people have traumatic experiences with parents and so on. Yeah. And if you focus on the positive, it's a good way to let go of the trauma associated with the true.

SPEAKER_02

01:44:47 - 01:45:06

But like another example would be like, I think I'll go to school, Alex. I stopped going to school on the seventh grade, but people go, but you sound so smart. And what am I supposed to do? I'm supposed to say, well, that's because of Scientology. Like, how do I answer that question? Like, if it's the only path I traveled, how do I answer that question? I don't necessarily want to give Scientology credit, but what am I supposed to point to? Sure.

SPEAKER_00

01:45:06 - 01:45:23

You know, I mean, you said this, you kind of enjoy. I mean, part of it is you joking and trolling that you enjoy knowing that your YouTube channel drives David Mascavich crazy. I mean, what? That means you still, I mean, there is a joy you have.

SPEAKER_02

01:45:23 - 01:45:25

There is a joy. I'm not going to deny that.

SPEAKER_00

01:45:25 - 01:45:32

I don't know what to make of that because there's a, I suppose there's an intimacy when you're part of a tribe of that kind.

SPEAKER_02

01:45:32 - 01:46:07

It's almost like, let me try to, let me try to frame it. I wasn't trying to get kicked out of Scientology. I was trying to not get kicked out of Scientology. I, you know, so what happened first, first my mom got kicked out for basically talking some smack about David misgabbage. And then they go to me and they go, okay, you've got to disconnect from your mom or you're going to get kicked out. And I lied about that. I was like, okay, I'll do this. But I never did for a couple of years. I lied to my ass off about it. Eventually, they were like, this guy's going to keep lying to us, right? And they're like, yeah, like, all right, you're out. So then they go to my wife. So you got to divorce your husband or you're going to get kicked out. And she goes, no.

SPEAKER_00

01:46:14 - 01:46:17

That's a hell of a statement from her.

SPEAKER_02

01:46:17 - 01:46:21

It's gonna get harder for me or so. I'm not quite sure how to.

SPEAKER_00

01:46:21 - 01:46:26

Okay, so I'll try to get, I'll try to do my best. You don't seem like a man who's afraid of hard things.

SPEAKER_02

01:46:26 - 01:47:52

Okay. So she's like, no. Something they got her her parents. And they say, you've got to disconnect from your daughter and your three-grade daughters. But you're gonna get kicked out. But they have three other kids who are Scientologists, who have spouses who are Scientologists, who have grandkids. So I feel like up until that point, everybody was sort of making a decision for themselves and what would be best for themselves until they get to her parents. And then they're like, which grandkids are we going to lose? At the part where they were trying to get me to disconnect my mom? They were hours that I spent talking to them going, you know, guys. There's another way. It doesn't have to go this way. There's another way that ends well for all of us. And that wasn't even considered. And I go like, they created this monster. And that's a fact. And that's why I take joy in it. When people ask me a Scientology, a destructive cult, I don't even have to get into all the academic discussions of what's a religion and what's a cult and what's a difference. I go as long as they destroy families like that, they're cult.

SPEAKER_00

01:47:52 - 01:48:05

So they cut people off deliberately, one by one. And it doesn't have to be that way. Right. And why is it that way?

SPEAKER_02

01:48:05 - 01:49:12

I mean, it started with L. Ron Hubbard, laying out a policy framework, a policy structure that if interpreted and applied in the worst possible way with the worst possible judgment can be abused in that way, I would make the argument that if an Annie broker had taken over, that Scientology policy does have enough little caveats baked into it that even the policies about disconnection could be interpreted and implemented in a non-destructive way. There is room for judgment and discretion. and misgavage has just created the worst possible version of Scientology, and that's where you sort of get the argument of, does he even want Scientology to succeed? Because he seems to be held bent on making sure that he doesn't. And I don't want to see him make it succeed, but it does bring that question up of like, what are his motivations? Can he not see that he's destroying the thing he's supposed to be expanding?

SPEAKER_00

01:49:12 - 01:49:58

That's also, you know, there's ways to measure cost. And that would probably be the most costly aspect of Scientology is the suffering associated with the separating of families. Yeah. I mean, that's actually just puts make, it's a very concrete what we value in human life. is the connection to our loved ones. Like everything else doesn't matter, like getting 50 bucks a week. Like that, like getting money stolen from you, getting the truth stolen from you, none of that compares. You can even frame that as the good. There could be a lot of positives, whatever, in the tribe, but separating families, separating loved ones. That's the destructive thing.

SPEAKER_01

01:50:00 - 01:50:06

So no hate, though. No, I genuinely don't hate them. Do you forgive them?

SPEAKER_02

01:50:06 - 01:50:35

100%. There's no one I look at in Scientology that I go, how dare you. If I was in the shoes, having to, you know, operate an understatement scavengers orders, I would have done the same thing and I would have loved it. Truthfully, I don't blame any of them. I mean, I take the opposite approach. If they knew what I knew, they'd be doing what I'm doing. If they knew what I knew and believed it, they'd be doing what I'm doing. They're not dumb. It's not dumb people in Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

01:50:35 - 01:50:42

They're ambitious. They're dreamers. They got hope. They're driven all that kind of stuff. Yeah.

SPEAKER_02

01:50:42 - 01:52:20

And it's one of the reasons I like putting up content on my channel so they can see, hey, like if you're a Scientologist, you look at that new, hey. He seems like he's doing well. He's kind of his happy. He's a positive guy. He's a good communicator. He knows what he's talking about. He's not lying. He's not exaggerating. I don't exaggerate anything on my channel. I don't make up anything. And this is actually comes from an experience I had from 1998 to 2000. I was living in LA. I showed at a two-year period of my life where I actually had almost no contact with Scientology. And during that time, I found my way onto the internet. And there was a website, it might have been ESMB, X Scientology Message, but whatever it was, it was at that time, the main source of critical information about Scientology on the internet. And I looked at it. And remember, I was still a true believer. And I looked at this. And it was so offensive, insulting, hyperbolic, exaggerated, I was like, ah, just a bunch of bullshit. I was in Scientology for 16 more years. If what I had seen on the internet about critical of Scientology, if what I had seen when I had seen it was something that actually resonated with me, that I was like, oh, that I believed was true. That seemed credible. I would have gotten out of Scientology 16 years earlier. So I was like, How can I help create an experience on the internet that if a Scientologist stumbles upon it, it will resonate with them instead of repelling them? And that is exactly what I have set out to do and what I believe I've accomplished.

SPEAKER_00

01:52:20 - 01:52:35

There's the content, the message, but also just showing that you can be happy outside of Scientology. Exactly. You can have a feeling life, you can be a good man, you know, all that. What benefit do you think Tom Cruise gets from Scientology? So why is he still in Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

01:52:35 - 01:53:03

He genuinely loves it. And also, misgavage does there's one celebrity who does have the most unique experience in Scientology and that is Tom. Scientology hires all of Tom's staff. There are no all of Tom's staff are subject to interrogations by Scientology, not only in the hiring process, but during the employment like David Miscavich and Scientology runs Tom Cruise's life and his production company and his household staff.

SPEAKER_00

01:53:03 - 01:53:08

Do you imagine there's some personal connection there where they're just they like each other a lot?

SPEAKER_02

01:53:08 - 01:53:17

Best friends. I mean, it's them against the world. Yeah. It's how they say it. I think it's pretty easy to see how that works between the two of them.

SPEAKER_00

01:53:17 - 01:54:07

I think this idea of them against the world, us against the world is a really powerful intimate. I kind of see like friendships and relationships that way. I'm not in a dark sense, but it's like, The world is full of cruelty and absurdity and unfairness and so on. It's nice to cuddle together like the penguins and march of the people against the cold. And they're just like, and so especially with the ideology of of of Scientology. It this idea that you can you could be anything you can essentially you can manifest it essentially through like believing it And you don't really put it into those words but believing that you're you're a god. It's a really like inspiring positive thing to think

SPEAKER_02

01:54:08 - 01:54:42

If they could figure out how to do all that without destroying families and bankrupting its members, they might actually have a future. That's why it's funny because I feel like it's like I'm rooting for them to like succeed and do it right. And I'm not, but it's an interesting academic discussion to have of like we can all see how much people will sacrifice in the names of belief and religion. We can see how much Scientologists sacrifice based on what they already believe. if he would just start treating people less horribly. You know what I'm saying? They might actually have a future.

SPEAKER_00

01:54:42 - 01:55:46

But I wanted to. It seems like this dark lesson of human nature that there's something about, you know, to use the word cults that you just stop seeing reality for what it is. There's a lot of things that could make this a better organization that's actually helping people flourish and and be a little bit more like loose about membership, not dividing families, not causing suffering, not causing financial harm, but actually inspiring people and helping people, but then maybe it did fundamentally change the what the organization is. And maybe that means something like giving them scavenger loses power too, which might be very difficult, or people that are close to them lose power, and people hold on to power. So, whatever the human forces here, it seems to become worse and worse over time. What about, uh, oh, that's a conspiracy question. Is there a chance that Tom Cruise is being blackmailed that there's information from auditing? No. No. So that kind of stuff is not.

SPEAKER_02

01:55:46 - 01:56:23

That's very because I've actually come out and said definitively, uh, I do not know of a single person who stays in Scientology because they're afraid of being blackmailed. It's just not a thing. It's just not a thing. Does Scientology have enough information to blackmail someone if they want to do? Well, sure. I mean, and it doesn't have to be true. It could just be lies. Who cares? Who knows? Scientology can say whatever the Hollywood want. So that's the thing. It doesn't even have to be true. And actually, that would be the argument against blackmailing. Like in order for Scientology to blackmail you with that information, they'd actually have to represent that, yes, he really did tell us this. And it's like, well, why are you spilling secrets of members, right? Like it sets a bad precedent?

SPEAKER_00

01:56:23 - 01:56:25

What are some of the sins according to Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

01:56:26 - 01:56:51

Most of the sins from a Scientology perspective are just doing or saying anything that brings disrepute to Scientology itself, right? Remember, they don't, it's not like Christianity where there's rules. If you break this rule, you're not getting into heaven. Yeah. Because Scientology doesn't think about things. Oh, there's the drug. You can't do drugs, right? You can't do drugs. And you can't take any psychotropic medications.

SPEAKER_00

01:56:51 - 01:56:52

And no medications almost at all.

SPEAKER_02

01:56:53 - 01:57:17

You're allowed to take medications. There's no rules, especially prohibiting it. It's just most Scientologists tend not to. You can take Adville, but many Scientologists won't. You just can't take anything prescribed by a psychiatrist, a psychologist, or any drugs that are psychotropic drugs. I mean, SSRIs are considered probably the closest thing to pure evil in the world of Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

01:57:17 - 01:57:21

What about, we are question, what about sex? Is there boundaries on what's

SPEAKER_02

01:57:21 - 01:58:03

They're used to not be. It's become very puritanical in the last many decades. For a reason I can't actually explain, like, misgavage does seem to be infatuated with controlling sex. Like that is one thing about misgavage version of Scientology that's gotten very strange. I mean, I'll run hybrid even specific of a policy that says, we are no longer going to Regulate in any way the bedroom activities of people. He literally said from this point on, no one is allowed to be subject to any justice actions of any kind whatsoever for anything they do in their sexual lives. But that was still did not give permission for gay relationships. That was still referring to straight stuff.

SPEAKER_00

01:58:03 - 01:58:10

And, uh, monogamous only. Can you do problems that can can you open marriages and open relationships?

SPEAKER_02

01:58:10 - 01:58:37

According to that over on Hypert policy, you can. Yeah, but you know, I think you've wrote that policy before he created the seorganization. And then what happened is this is actually how this came into effect. He created this organization. You had a lot of people on a ship and everybody was banging each other and it created just a nightmare of personal relationship that it was making production impossible. Not because everybody was spending so much time banging, but because everybody was still upset about who was banging you.

SPEAKER_00

01:58:37 - 01:59:02

I mean, sex and sex and that kind of dynamics is really I mean, humans do what humans do and then there's drama and all that. It's understandable because every so intimate is the closed tribe. It makes sense to limit sex otherwise everyone's but otherwise it becomes a sex cult. Yeah, which a lot of them end up becoming. And that's how big. Would you classify a Scientology as a cult? 100%.

SPEAKER_02

01:59:03 - 01:59:27

But not because I'm like fully conversant with the academic differentiation between what's a religion and what's a cult. I mean, Scientology would say, well, all small new religions are cults. And I don't know, that's probably true. Some people would say, all religions are cults. And I'd be like, depends on how you define religion. It depends on how you define cults. But I just fall back on my thing of like, if you're destroying families and bankrupting your members, you're a cult. That's

SPEAKER_00

01:59:28 - 02:00:05

That's us versus them and the them could be your family, it could be your loved ones that that's deeply destructive and one of the things you would probably throw into a definition of a call to something that's actually destructive because I do a lot of stuff that's called like GJ2. There's a lot of really close knit tribes but there's no negative toxicity to it. There's no divide. There's no divisions or if there is it's more boy, try being a fan of a certain soccer team and then becoming a fan of another soccer. That's hard core.

SPEAKER_02

02:00:05 - 02:00:34

And they, but I'll tell you, I trained you Jitsu as well and I have found that community of people to be one of the most loving and helpful group of people ever. Shout out to John Keller, Gracie Baha'a Claywater. Um, no, but seriously, like it's one of, uh, it's one of the reasons I continue to do it despite my back, my hip, my shoulder. It's like it's just such a cool group of guys.

SPEAKER_00

02:00:34 - 02:01:50

Goes on. I used to not, I think it was much more divisive in the beginning from this Brazilian roots. One of the things that's really hard is that the team oriented like, if you're this team, you're, you're right a die with this team. And there's no, there's a crunch as they go to another team. And I think that aspect, that was actually a turnoff for me in the beginning, that the toxicity of that, because I understand that a little bit for the elites, for the highest of the highest, that there's, I like the brotherhood and the loyalty of the people, like the Olympic gold medalist, the, like the best in the world, yes, but for like recreational fun, I know. It's like, this is all, ultimately about the camaraderie of all human beings together, not some, whatever label you put on yourself. I don't think we actually talked about the organization itself. We talked about tax exempt status, which is really important. We talked about some of the control, like through the propaganda control of what's out there. It's actually interesting that you said that like the Scientology is pretty much lost the battle with the internet. Oh yeah. Which is kind of inspiring that it's hard to defeat the internet. But then there's like bots there. I think if you're sophisticated, I'm not sure that's true.

SPEAKER_02

02:01:50 - 02:02:02

But if you know, it's kind of remarkable. They haven't been able to capitalize on these bot armies because there's one thing that they have. It's a lot of tax-free money that they got nothing else better to do. So you know, they just they should give you a call like they just don't have the right people apparently.

SPEAKER_00

02:02:04 - 02:02:15

But that said, how do they wield influence with government agencies? You've talked about the local police enforcement, also federal agencies anything.

SPEAKER_02

02:02:15 - 02:03:10

That is the one way they effectively put their money to use. It is lobbyists and attorneys, judges. Very rarely have they ever been able to just get a politician on their side. It's behind the scenes people. You know, Greta van Sustrins is a very high-level long-term Scientologist. And her husband, I always get it wrong and see the Jim Colour John Colour, I always get it wrong. He's a very powerful attorney who has a lot, wields a lot of influence behind the scenes. And that's just one example. Like, the reason why that's an interesting example is because he's actually a Scientologist and he travels in those circles. Scientology, though, its money goes to good use by hiring non-scientologists, retired judges, attorneys, lobbyists. It really is how they get almost anything done. Like, misgavage himself is not hobnobbing and in glad hang and shaking hands and meeting these folks. It's the non-scientologist professionals who work behind the scenes on Scientologies behalf.

SPEAKER_00

02:03:11 - 02:03:19

Can you describe the dynamics of how that actually happens? Like, why would the police department work on behalf of Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

02:03:19 - 02:04:05

I meant more of the courts and regulators, not the police department, but for example, it can come down to something as simple as this. Sign in clear water, Scientology, hires clear water police to do off duty work for them. They pay like three times the normal off duty rate. So they will, even though I'm not aware of anyone on the Clearwater PD who's actually a Scientologist, they basically end up with, they would call them allies or safe points, right? People who, like, will literally operate a Scientology spies. You know, someone comes in and falls a report about some child sex case. Someone in the Clearwater PD is calling Sarah Heller at the Office of Special Affairs at the Flying Glad and Base to let her know. Hey, heads up. We got a thing coming in and then Scientology can run around and go talk to all the Scientologists who have knowledge about this and either get them out of Clearwater.

SPEAKER_00

02:04:05 - 02:04:16

But you know, so it's not like direct explicit corruption, but more just the friends and coworkers integrated deeply in the community.

SPEAKER_02

02:04:17 - 02:05:13

Yeah, I call it soft corruption. So another example, you have the mayor of Clearwater, Frank Hibbert. Well, he used to when when he won his recent election, he stepped down from some of his nonprofits that he served on. But the nonprofits that he served on also gets millions of dollars of donations from some of Scientology's richest clearwater members, right? You have one of the mayor's best friends, Joe Burdette, literally a paid lobbyist for Scientology. So that creates a chilling effect on anyone who's going to be talking smack about Scientology because his friends are on their damn payroll. So, um, I call it soft corruption. It's not illegal. It's not illegal. Um, but it's house Scientology wields influence. And what's what's ironic is that a lot of these people who work on Scientology behalf actually secretly hate Scientology.

SPEAKER_00

02:05:13 - 02:05:39

They kind of see through it, but as part of the community, I mean, it's deeply integrated in the community and there's financial leverage. Um, are you ever afraid I mean, a phrase for you while being afraid for your ability to function in society, because of the pressures from psychology. No. Is that because you're genetically malfunctioning or mentally, or is there speaking out as a kind of protection?

SPEAKER_02

02:05:40 - 02:06:35

I think it's one of those things that once you've seen behind the curtain, you see the Wizard of Oz is just a silly man. You just don't have any fear. Now, it's one of these things like people say, oh, you're so brave. And I got, what's that quote? Bravery is, you know, being a soldier and being afraid and going in any way. It's not brave to run. And if you don't think nothing's going to happen to you. Like so I'm just trying to like I do not hold myself up as an example of bravery because yeah, I thought like oh, they could destroy me, but I don't care. No, there's not a damn thing they can do to me and it's one of that's one of the reasons I continue to put out content every day to just basically go hey still here I dare you to try to do something about it, but you can't and hope that that also serves as kind of an example for other people to go. If this Shmo can do it, and they can't do anything else to him, then maybe I can do it too, because I would love it. I would love there for be a 20 channels where former Scientologist talk about their experience.

SPEAKER_00

02:06:35 - 02:07:44

I mean, that is bravery because what happens is fear, seepsin, even if it's not grounded in reality. But at the same time, like, you know, My grandfather who fought in World War II. I mean, the story is, I mean, he was very convinced and sure. Most of the people he fought alongside would die. He was a machine gunner, but he believed that bullets can't hit him. Right? He said. Well, you know, he was right. Right? Because he survived. So there's some sense, like you're... He's like, just like, you're like, I'm not brave. I just, the bullets can hit me. I mean, there's a dark kind of truth to that. There's some, you know, it's like, it's a feedback loop where if you have the confidence and you push on forward and you're brave in that way to not let fear seep in and affect you, it actually gives you less things to be scared about. Yeah. I mean, but that initial few steps might be for people. It might be a very difficult step to take to talk about the fear was

SPEAKER_02

02:07:45 - 02:08:44

knowing how the family was going to be destroyed and trying to prevent that. I was terrified of that happening. But it happened. There's nothing left to be afraid of. And that's kind of the thing like they created this beast and the same is true from Mark Hedley, the same is true from Mike Render. I said they've essentially created a Scientology Proof virus, a Scientology Resistance strain by throwing everything they have at us for so many years. They have just through natural selection created people who just do not give a damn about anything they could or would do and maybe there is something a little wrong with me because when I get a phone call from someone like I just got this phone call about you and it's clear that it's Scientology PI's doing work behind the scenes. I get really excited. I get really excited. I don't get nervous. I don't know what's happened. I'm like, oh, yeah. This is going to be exciting. I'm like, okay, because everything they try to do to me I'm going to figure out how to reflect it back on them and make them look ridiculous.

SPEAKER_00

02:08:44 - 02:08:58

And that pills and comparison to the separating from family. Exactly. What is there is there parts of your family that you've lost because of Scientology?

SPEAKER_02

02:08:58 - 02:10:17

Yes. If you most of my episode on the Lee Remnant in the aftermath show was talking about me and my twin brother. It's just a pretty horrible story. This is a pretty horrible story. So I do have a younger brother who's still in Scientology and disconnected from me, but I never had much of a relationship with that brother. Really to begin with, right? But my twin brother died when I was like 23 or 24. And that was without any question, a direct result of our Scientology experience. You know, he died in a car accident that wasn't technically his fault or anything like he wasn't even the one driving. But the fact, the specific fact of his death was not meaning like the fact and the manner of his death and wasn't like specifically because of Scientology. But our story and how where our relationship got to, and how he was even in a position of having something like that happened to him is directly attributable, design-tology.

SPEAKER_00

02:10:17 - 02:10:24

Do you think about him, Misson? It's part of what you're doing in memory of him.

SPEAKER_02

02:10:24 - 02:10:32

Yeah, for sure. And this is some, you know, we were identical twins. Can you imagine two of me?

SPEAKER_00

02:10:32 - 02:10:43

I could barely handle one. I love it. Uh, losing him would that be the darkest moment in this whole journey of Scientology for you.

SPEAKER_02

02:10:43 - 02:12:41

Two moments would equal the darkest moment. It would be that. And also just the period of, you know, six, nine, 12 months of impending doom. Knowing that my wife's whole family was going to be obliterated And that there's nothing we could do about it. And in kind of telling ourselves every step of the way it wasn't really going to happen, you know. And I really felt like you ever watched the Ozarks. I felt like Marty Bird. Now this was happening before the Ozarks, but when I watched the Ozarks and I see that character. the entire world is crumbling down around him and all he can all he can all I didn't like. All right, what's the next step? I watched Marty Bird and I go, that's my fucking spirit animal because you can only control what you can control. And you can't keep Scientology from destroying your family. And literally, like I, it's funny, I mentioned to show a lot because I watched that and I go like, that's exactly how I felt. You know, I talked about this six months or nine, 12 months, whatever was of impending doom. It's not like I was an emotional wreck during that time. You know, in private I was, but it's not like I was just freaking out. It was like the sun's gonna come up tomorrow. The world's gonna keep spinning. I can't control it. This is hard. I can't believe this is happening. But tomorrow's a new day. I've never personally, even at the darkest times, I've never experienced anything that I would characterize as depression, certainly not ever any suicidal thoughts or anything. And even in the darkest of times, and again, this one thing that I go, is it because of Scientology or is it just me? There really is an emotional detachment.

SPEAKER_00

02:12:41 - 02:12:46

There almost has to be. And it's a cold calculation. What are my options?

SPEAKER_02

02:12:47 - 02:13:02

What do we do here? And then once I figure out the answer to that question, I'm actually quite chipper and happy. You know, like that's sort of my default. Like you could give me six horrible options. Once I figure out the best of those six, I'm gonna feel like I just had a pretty good day.

SPEAKER_00

02:13:02 - 02:13:21

That's brilliant. Because I just watching Ozarks is so stressful. It is, right? So stressful watching it. And he usually finds a way. And usually it is a set of really bad options and it's one of the bad options, but it's the best of the bad options.

SPEAKER_02

02:13:21 - 02:14:46

And he almost gets pissed off at everyone around him for being so pouty about it. but you know it's like you know it's still simmering there right under the surface like pretty damn close to the surface do you know what I mean yeah and um people sometimes ask about recovery and whatnot and like what does that look like and what does that mean and sort of goes back to kind of the emotional detachment is I go What the fuck does recovery even mean? If you're an alcoholic and you're recovering, you know what that means. I used to drink. I don't drink now. Well, I used to be in a cult and I'm not in a cult now. How else am I supposed to feel about this for someone to be like, it seems like you've recovered. What the fuck does that even mean? Like I'm sure some academic has an answer to that question. I'm not someone who particularly, I don't spend any time thinking about that. My recovery is success and a little bit of trolling and revenge. But mostly success. You know, what does it mean to be a recovered former cult member? What you don't cry? I wouldn't be asking about your brother. I don't know what it means. I've never had therapy but not because I'm still like against it from Scientology. I just like, I'm not going to pay to talk to someone. Do you know where else I could do that? Scientology. No, I know there's a lot of people going like, oh boy, I know there's a lot. I'm not sitting on therapy. I would rather have a beer with my friend and talk about this shit. Yeah, then talk to a professional for $200 an hour. It's a kind of therapy.

SPEAKER_00

02:14:46 - 02:15:10

Yeah. Yeah. Listen, part of the reason I do this podcast is talking to people that you care about, that you're close with. This is a really powerful powerful thing. Yeah, I don't know what recovery looks like. Success to you is defined. Just be defined happiness. Find happiness outside the closed bubble that defines what happiness looks like or Scientology.

SPEAKER_02

02:15:10 - 02:15:13

If I can make my kids happy, that's success to me.

SPEAKER_00

02:15:13 - 02:15:19

What advice would you give to your kids on how to live? Travel the world. A life that can be proud of. Travel the world.

SPEAKER_02

02:15:19 - 02:16:12

Travel the world. get rid of friends who don't push you up and don't celebrate your success. It's hard to give that advice to young children because kids are always so caddy. But honestly, it's like when I see that really is, I just think not just advice to my kids, but some of the best advice to anybody. If you've got anyone around you who doesn't celebrate your success, just spend less time with those people. Surround yourself with people who actually want to celebrate your success and push you to succeed. I think that's true. I think it's even more important at a young age, because if at a young age you get used to being around people who kind of take joy and tearing you down, then that's what you become accustomed to. And I just think, you know, having friends who love you and support you is just about the closest thing to the true meaning of life.

SPEAKER_00

02:16:13 - 02:17:37

And we believe in you, we believe in your potential. And some of those ideas underlie the good parts of Scientology. And except there's a lot of dark parts of Scientology that separate you from the people that believe in you and that love you. Well, this is a beautiful conversation here, beautiful human being, who came full of gifts And I mean, I genuinely, first of all, you're an aspiring human being, but most importantly, I can't wait until I can purchase a Bobblehead on the store. So I can keep that inspiration on my desk at desktop. Aaron, thank you so much for talking to me. Thank you for being you for being brave. I know you said you're not, but thank you for being brave for talking about this. You're an inspiration and you help a lot of people. Thank you, brother. Thanks very much. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Aaron Smith 11. The support to spot guests, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, let me leave you with some words from Ralph Waldo Emerson. Be not the slave of your own past. Plunge into the sublime seas, dive deep and swim far. So you will come back with new self-respect, with new power, and with an advanced experience that will explain and overlook the old. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.