Transcript for S04 - Ep. 9: This Is the Weirdness

From serial productions in the New York Times, this is serial season 4, Guantanamo, one prison camp told week by week. I'm Sarah Canig, and this is our final episode. Every couple of weeks at the bland hour of 5 p.m. on a Tuesday. A group of people you've never heard of clicks into a Zoom meeting. They're all family members of people who died on September 11th. There's Colleen, a nurse practitioner in the Bronx, and Terry, a retired documentary filmmaker in Boston. Diane and Savannah retired ordained minister. Valerie, he used to work in nonprofits and are omnipresent feline. I'm gonna get the cast tail out of my face. Barry, a graphic designer in Oregon.

Oh, Barry got a haircut.

And Phyllis, in New York, retired teacher who recently turned 80.

They've known each other a long time, many of them for a decade or more. Through career changes and new grandchildren and health troubles.

Yeah.

The first meeting I sat in on, June of 2022, I assumed they'd be like a support group. Instead, the topic that day was the physical and mental well-being of the five men accused of orchestrating the attacks that killed their relatives. If the men don't get the death penalty, there's a very real possibility they won't. What should the men's punishment be?

Florence, Colorado is the site of a federal supermax prison, unless you're a federal crime buff. I'm guessing you might not be able to name anyone incarcerated in Florence, Colorado. These guys can.

With Sally, Hansen, Zernoff.

Ted's emergency. That's Colleen. She tells the group she'd be fine with collegiatek Muhammad, the alleged mastermind of 9-11, ending up in a place like Florence. She doesn't want to put to death or tortured, but solitary for the rest of his life would be okay with her. Valerie agrees. Others think Florence is too harsh.

Yeah. Everything about this call seemed upside down. That this group of people would care about a humane future for the 9-11 defendants. That the defendants might want to remain at Guantanamo. That the last people you think should be dealing with any of this, end up dealing with all of this. And they weren't just doing a thought experiment here. Their positions matter. This group is called September 11th families for peaceful tomorrows. After Martin Luther King Jr. quote, wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows. All the members are peace snakes. That's what brought the original members together in the first place. Their opposition to the U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan a month after the September 11th attacks. of the many family groups that formed after 9-11. This is the only one closely monitoring the trial of the 9-11 accused. The only one whose members traveled at every court session held for the case. Collectively, they've watched hundreds of hours of port proceedings, filed multiple amicus briefs. They research deeply, stake out common sense but often unpopular positions, and lobby aggressively for those positions. And especially right then, spring of 2022, this group had some political juice. The 9-11 case was at a turning point. It had been in pre-trial hearings for 10 years already, 10 years of waiting for someone to be held responsible for the deaths of their family members. And now, a solution was maybe in sight. Peaceful tomorrow has had long pushed for this, for an ending. Liz, one of the younger members, tells the group she's a little conflicted. She's always been for closing Guantanamo. It's been one of the group's steadfast positions. Close it. But then she visited the base again recently, took in the whole clattering machine of the case, and now she's not sure. Maybe it does make more sense for the 9-11 defendants to serve out their sentences at Guantanamo to not close down the facility.

Liz was six years old when her father, a firefighter, was killed at the World Trade Center. And now here she was, 27, working as a city council person in her home town, planning her wedding on the side. And on the side side, trying to think through one of the most morally and legally complex criminal cases in American history. But most aspects of Guantanamo can fairly be described as perverse, to wit previous eight episodes of this series. But the one thing that at least seemed logical about Guantanamo was the 9-11 trial. The idea of it was clear. We held in our custody in the men we believed were behind the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in the United States. If anyone was our enemy at Guantanamo, it was these men. If any justice was to be had, it was through this trial. But remember how at the beginning of this series, I said Guantanamo was the craziest criminal justice story we'd ever seen? The 9-11 case is largely what I had in mind. When I plotted out, it describes a not so gordian and a national psychology so convoluted. It changed my animating question about the trial, which used to be how will it end? Now my question is, will it end? Colleen Kelly, the nurse practitioner, was my main guide for the 9-11 trial. So to explain it to you, I'm going to stick with her. Colleen's brother, Bill Kelly, died on September 11th, who's 30 years old. He worked in finance, something e-trade. Colleen never fully understood. But she used to visit his fancy Bloomberg office. He'd visit Colleen in the Bronx, play with his niece and nephews. On September 11th, Bill happened to be at the World Trade Center for Conference, so it took a few hours before the family figured out he was in the building. Around midnight, Colleen headed into Manhattan with a friend to look for Bill, and they performed the same impident itinerary of hundreds of other family members in the shell-shock city, walking, walking, emergency room to emergency room, a fizzreal, Bellevue, and why you. Finally, she said, all these families ended up in a big auditorium downtown, where people's names would get called.

This is at three or four in the morning and just to file, I don't know, missing persons report like we had to report. Yeah. And you did that, you met with somebody? Yes, a female detective, I remember that.

Colleen and her parents and her siblings populated a sudden demographic, which eventually would squeeze into a military acronym, VFMs, victim-family members. They eventually get their own section of the airplane that flies down to Guantanamo. Their own escorts and drivers on the base. Their own curtain-off seating area inside the gallery of the military court. Their own press conferences. All that was years away. In the moment, right after the attack, Colleen tried to find out what happened to her brother. Not the general outlines. She had to know exactly what happened.

I became obsessed with understanding his last day. I want to know what my brother was thinking when he was trapped on the 164. I want to understand Was he panicked? Was he okay? Was he hopeful? What was he thinking? Like it became very, very important to me. Like give it give it give it give it give it give it give it give it give me everything right now. Like I want to know every I don't know if Bill jumped. I believe he did. I became obsessed with that question in the fall of 2001.

She went about answering that question methodically, like a detective. Several weeks after 9-11, Colleen's family found out that Bill had sent blackberry messages to his boss at Bloomberg after the plane hit the North Tower. The last message Colleen saw was from 9-23 AM. There was a whole hour to go. The North Tower didn't collapse until 10-28. Colleen fixated on that last hour, on Bill's last minutes. Bloomberg also gave Colleen's family photos of Bill from that morning at Windows on the world. It turned out they'd hired a photographer for the event, who'd left just before the building was hit. Colleen spoke with the photographer, studied her pictures. In one of them, Bill's talking with a man Colleen didn't recognize, receding hairline, glasses. That's spring the New York Times published a big story, a TikTok of the final 102 minutes of the towers. Colleen examined the grainy zoomed in shot of people teeming at the blown out windows. And one of them, she thought she recognized Bill. So Colleen contacted that photographer. went to his studio in Lower Manhattan. He gave her an enlarged print to take home. She stared at it. Yes, it looks like Bill, she thought. He's at an open window. She sees the back of his head. His arm is reaching across the vertical window frame, reaching out to another man, receding hairline, like the guy from the Bloomberg photo. Maybe Bill knew him. They're holding onto each other's arms. This photo is partly why Colleen thinks Bill jumped. Also, they never found any remains of her brother, while other bodies were recovered from the 164. Eventually Colleen was able, as she says, to let it let go. She realized excavating Bill's last minutes was her way of trying to take away some of the pain and fear her brother must have felt, a way to absorb it into herself, which was impossible. The energy Colleen put into tracking bills last hour, that ferocity for uncovering information, and that fealty to facts no matter how distressing. Now multiply that a thousand fold, and that's what Colleen has dedicated to the 911 trial. She's been to Guantanamo well over a dozen times. If she can't watch the trial in person, she'll sometimes go to remote viewing station at Fort Hamilton, an army-based near the Verizano Bridge in Brooklyn. When hearing Zartens session, which is most of the time, she calls up experts and attorneys to ask questions and talk strategy. Before I knew better, I thought the actual trial of the 9-11 accused might not matter all that much to Colleen. Five men languishing at Guantanamo in prison for 20 years already, unlikely to ever be free. Why would a trial affect Colleen's life? Her busy life, by the way. She sent me straight. She did care.

My God, yes. Yeah, yeah. hugely because you know, if Bill was killed on a street corner in Manhattan where he lived, of course I would be at that trial every day when when it came to a trial, you know, it's like, you want to know all the facts, you want to know how this happened, who this person was, what went on and have people be held accountable. So yes, it was always really, really interested both in the trial as a form of accountability. But also, what the hell happened that day? Like this, this sounds ridiculous that I'm saying this to you right now. 22 years later, no one knows how did Cleanshake Muhammad do what he did? How did the hijackers get their money? How did They get on planes, who knew what, when, how, how are all these other guys, the other four men, how are they involved? You know, I like, I literally, I don't know what they did. You know, he was the money guy. What does that mean? I don't know what that means. money to do what did you know what they were doing with the money? To me, that's the hardest piece of this. It comes back to the evidence. What is the evidence against these other four men? I really don't know. I'm intensely obsessively wanting to know how this all happened. Why?

Do you feel like you know why they did it?

No. I've been told by people who are not the five accused, why they did it. No, I don't know why they did it.

I said you need to hear it from them.

Yeah. It's just it's how it's how it's what I need. It's what I need.

Keep in mind, Colleen is looked at everything she can get her hands on about how and why 9-11 happened. Government reports, statements by the 9-11 accused, books by prominent journalists. Most extraordinary to me, she spent years visiting a former member of the militant group, whether underground and prison. She wanted to know what it felt like when your belief system carried you past natural boundaries to extreme violence. But none of it satisfied her. In this case, Colleen needs primary sources. She needs specific answers that are still locked inside these specific defendants. The trial would unlock them. That's what trials are for. The military commissions at Guantanamo were supposed to be our Nuremberg trials. When the Allied powers prosecuted Nazis and German leaders immediately following the Second World War, the Nuremberg trials were huge, efficient, and by many measures successful. They didn't fix the world, but they at least held racist and murders to account, helped repair broken continent, and reset a common morality. That said, war crimes, no matter how chaotic or horrific, would be adjudicated in a civilized court of law for all the world to see. It's no wonder then that photos of the Nuremberg trial hung on the wall at the prosecution offices of the military commissions. Oh, whoa. What is that? On Colleen Kelly's wall, hung a handmade primer explaining the military commissions, the opposite of the Nuremberg trials in terms of efficiency and success.

What just explained what I'm looking at. Behind her bedroom door was a waterfall of paper. Giant presentation size sheets, describing the special court. Created to try a handful of one tonimo prisoners we charge with terrorism or war crimes. The 9-11 case was meant to be the main event.

This is really helpful because we all forget about the charges against the 9-11.

This document was for an explainer she did years ago, but Colleen was keeping it here because so much time had passed since the 9-11 criminal case started, she sometimes forgets the basics. Also, I suspect, because the case has emulsified into her waking life, so that she hardly noticed that an enormous handwritten record of judicial disappointment occupied physical and mental real estate in her bedroom, spitting distance from her pillow while she slept.

You can age this document by the judge calling listed on one of the sheets, Judge Poll. He lasted the first six years until 2018. Then came Judge Perella, who left after nine months. Then Judge Cohen came in, pledging continuity, so important in a case of this magnitude. Less than a year later, Cohen retired. Then Judge Wat can stepped in temporarily until Judge Keen came aboard. Judge Keen lasted two weeks, he had conflicts. Then Judge McCall, but McCall had been a judge for less than two years, which was against the rules so Judge Watt can step in temporarily again. Then Judge Acosta Babies at the case for a minute until Judge McCall came back once he had two years experience under his belt. Judge McCall is the current judge on the 9-11 case. He's announced he might or might not be retiring at the end of this year. I know you're not following this. That's the problem. No one can follow this.

Like no joke on January 1st. I saw some friends that I've been seeing a long time and they know that I'm very active in this in this work and they asked kind of what's going on and I started to explain and I see This is a guy who's a lawyer and he's really smart and he's really engaged on issues of great importance around the globe. And I just see like after a while just glazes over. Yeah, I was kind of bummed out.

Do you get this sense they don't believe you? Like they think you must not understand what's happening because it can't be that bad or literally it's just too complicated.

It's too complicated. Because if you start to say something, you say a sentence, you realize you have to say another sentence to explain it. Because there's no way there is no elevator pitch for this.

No elevator pitch, okay. But how about we take the stairs? You and me. All the way to the top. And you lend me those, I don't know, seven minutes. And I'll spin you through this for cocktail case in this for cocktail cord. So you can understand the buying the 911 cases in right now. After we captured the five defendants, the men we believed plotted and carried out the 911 attacks, we held them in CIA custody, in black sites around the world, and we tortured them. After three, four years, we sent them to Guantanamo, in September of 2006. A couple of false starts later, including a politically disastrous effort to bring the case to federal court in Manhattan. The men eventually were arraigned in May of 2012, at a military commission in Guantanamo Bay. The five defendants were collegiate Muhammad, while he'd been attached, Ramsey Benel Shiba, Amar Al-Baluchi, and Mustafa Al-Halsawi. In the courtroom, they would each sit in a different row, one behind the other, and the order they appear in the charge sheet, KSM to Halsawi. So, how is this court different from all other courts? And why doesn't it work? Any normal lawyer hearing what I'm about to lay out here is probably going to be horrified or else think I must be mistaken. I am not mistaken. Here we go. In normal criminal court, a defendant has a constitutional right to confront his accuser. So if I accuse you of assault, say, I've to come to court, take a oath, and testify in front of a judge or jury. In the military commissions, they'll entertain a jacked up form of hearsay evidence, which means an FBI agent can take the stand and say, years ago, I went to a police station in Yemen, and a Yemeni cop brought me some witnesses, he had already interrogated, and I talked to all of them, and I wrote down what they told me. But those original Yemeni witnesses don't have to be called in or take an oath or answer any questions because the agents who spoke with them don't even know how to find them anymore. The Yemeni's second hand statements made through an interpreter mind you can be allowed as evidence in the war court at Guantanamo. And these aren't any old criminal cases. These are capital cases, death penalty cases. As one former military defense attorney said to me, allowing that kind of hearsay quote, that would happen nowhere else. That's absolutely insane, unquote. Also, torture. Statements derive from torture or cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment cannot be used in federal court, period. But in the military commissions, it's mushier. Something I said while I was being tortured, you can't use that in an actual trial. But it's still in dispute whether the government could use my torture derived statements in pretrial hearings, or use something my neighbor said about me while he was being tortured. And, and this is the central issue now, they might be able to use it trial statements I made after I was tortured. Also, all the classified stuff, it is mind-boggling the profusion and confusion over what is classified. In the military commissions, the accused isn't allowed to see all the evidence against him because classified, a ton of it. Even the classification guidelines for the military commissions are themselves classified, but events can't see them all. And it's not just documents, the defense can't see. A large number of potential witnesses, people who worked in Blacksite say, their identities are classified. The defense can't call them because they can't identify them. And if they do happen to know the name of a CIA employee, current or former, they aren't allowed to contact them directly. So those are some of the baked-in problems. Now, to the weirder stuff. The cases from the outset have continuously fended off, let's call it interference, intrusion, infiltration, spying basically. The first big incident that made the news was in 2013, just as the case was getting underway. The kill button incident. One Monday afternoon in court, a lawyer for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was talking about evidence from CIA black sites, and when he said the word secret, the CCTV feed from the courtroom cut off, meaning anyone watching from the spectator's gallery or remotely suddenly heard nothing. White noise filled the speakers. The judge and the security officer sending to his right, they do have the ability to cut the feed to avoid classified spills. But in this instance, the judge hadn't pressed the button, and neither had the security officer. Someone else, some external body, had cut the feed, and the judge didn't know who and he was pissed. All kinds of questions erupted then. Who was listening in? What else could they hear? Was this the CIA? Did the CIA just drown out information it didn't want anyone talking about? Who was in charge of this thing? Who was really in charge? The kill button was only the beginning. In attorney-client meeting rooms, spaces that are supposed to be sacrosanct, they'd find hidden mics in the shape of phony smoke detectors, or else hidden in the walls. The FBI would pry inside a defense team, and one instance turning a defense staffer into an informant. An interpreter assigned to the defense seemed to have had a previous job at a CIA black site. So who was he really working for? All this bugging and snooping it was hard not to conclude was an effort to undermine the cases. To keep evidence and documentation of what happened to the men in black sites from becoming public. This is what the CIA feared and still fears. Secrets of the torture program becoming public. The CIA didn't offer any comment about this when I contacted them. Torture has infected almost every aspect of the military commission's cases. It's why so much of the discovery is classified or not available at all. It's why the men's physical and mental health is a constant topic. It's why fighting over and disability of evidence in the 9-11 case is epic. It's why delays and breakdowns in the proceedings are legion. Every one of these problems, the kill button that had mics, the classification arguments, the medical issues, and countless frequently ridiculous others that I do not have time in our journey here to name, all of it has involved litigation that causes months or half a year or several years of delays. And that is how a case which could have been, I don't know about a slam dunk, but vastly easier shortly. Remember, KSM has admitted planning 9-11. But this case is now entering its 13th year of pretrial hearings. Finally, last thing, I promise, appeals. Many, many legal experts who's looked at the 9-11 case agree that a verdict in this case cannot survive appeal, which likely eventually would end up in the Supreme Court. In a statement to lawmakers, a Marine Brigadier General who served as Chief Defense Council for the commissions wrote that the myriad defects mean that, quote, there are literally so many significant grounds for potential reversible error that it is impossible to list them all, unquote. And appeals, of course, take their own sweet time. The appeals could add another decade to this case, easily. Another attorney told me, in a moment of relaxed crankiness, that at the rate his case was going, it was actually possible his client's appellate attorney hadn't been born yet. So for family members of victims of the 911 attacks, watching the military commissions has been like trailing a morage. You can hear their mounting disillusion, and the VFM press conferences from Guantanamo over the years. At first, a lot of them, they thought it could work.

That's from a press conference in 2012 when the 9-11 defendants were arrayed. Two years later, you hear people start losing their patients.

This woman talked about how she'd been down in Guantanamo once before in 2009 and watched a mental competency hearing for one of the 9-11 defendants. Ramsey Benel Shaba. Now it was 2014 and she was back. Watching a mental competency hearing for one of the 9-11 defendants. Ramsey Benel Shaba.

But I see there. By 2017, you hear desperation.

After 2017, prosecutors stopped meeting with the media. For peaceful tomorrow's members, Colleen told me, 2017 was also the year they realized, oh, this is never gonna work.

We've had it. Like now we've had it. It's endless. There's always something. There's always gonna be something. That's one. It's like... pleadials.

Pleadials. The prosecution was still insisting they could get this child done, get guilty verdicts against the 9-11 defendants. What Colleen and Terry and the group members had lost faith, they could see clearly now. The military commission system was a failure. Forget about a trial. The only logical solution to ending this thing, to getting a conviction that would stick, to getting the answers they wanted, pleadials. Anyone could see that pleadials were the way to go, right? That's after the break.

The idea of a plea agreement was that if the government took the death penalty off the table, maybe the 9-11 defendants would plead guilty and give up their right to appeal. The case would be over. The plea would include an extensive, likely, months-long sentencing hearing, almost like its own trial, and such a hearing would include a stipulation of fact. This was key to calling a stipulation of fact, a narrative in which each defendant would explain with precision exactly what they had done to make 9-11 happen and exactly why they had done it. And that's how through a plea deal, Colleen could get the answers she needed. But a plea deal in the 9-11 case for a lot of people that's a tough sell. Because it's the 9-11 case. It's emotional. And a plea deal sounds wrong, like the government's giving up or just doesn't care anymore. And no death penalty for the people responsible for 9-11? Why would anyone ever make a deal with these guys? That is an understandable response. Especially if you have no idea how dysfunctional accord is, and let's face it very few people have clocked the ins and outs of the 9-11 case, including most politicians. While President Trump was in office, a plea deal in the 9-11 case was a non-starter. Come 2021 though, a few remarkable things happen to shake up the military commissions. First, the long-serving and forceful chief prosecutor, a general who'd been committed to a death penalty trial, announced he was retiring. His replacement Colleen thought might be more amenable to a plea. Then came the sentencing hearing of Majid Khan. The military jurors' response to hearing Majid Khan talk about being tortured. Their recommendation for clemency offered a clue as to how the jurors might react to the torture of the 9-11 defendants. One of whom, as a result of being satamized in CIA custody, has to sit on a cushion chair in court, and eventually underwent rectal repair surgery. In other words, even if prosecutors got a conviction at trial, they might not get a death sentence.

soon after Magic Con's sentencing.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled closing Guantanamo. The only victim family member who testified was Colleen. Her message was strong and sad. Family members who wanted and needed this trial to happen, she said, had already waited too long.

In May of 2012, I sat with my dear friend, Riddle-Sar, watching the arrangement of the 911 accused. Rita's brother, Abe, died when he stayed behind to assist a disabled coworker on the 27th floor of the North Tower. Rita is now deceased. In 2017, I was on the plane to Guantanmo with Lee Hansen, the only 9-11 family member to be deposed in the pre-trial hearings. Lee Hansen lost his son, his daughter-in-law, and his granddaughter on Flight 175. Mr. Hansen is now deceased. In 2019, I was on a boat crossing Guantano Bay with Alice Hogland, mother of Flight 93 Hero, Mark Bingham. Alice Hogland is now deceased.

Colleen and her cohort had always been the hippie 9-11 group. Anti-war, anti-violence, anti-guantanamo. In the world of victims family members, their views were squarely in the minority. But now, two decades later, it seemed the national mood had shifted. Benchfulness had dimmed, and Colleen was invited to the table. Five other people testified as well, non-hypis, conservatives. A couple of people who had been Guantanamo boosters back in the day, who'd helped design detainee policy and the military commissions on her president Bush. And now, nobody was arguing. Cleadials is the only way.

A few months after the Senate hearing in March of 2022, the newspaper announced prosecutors and defense attorneys were in talks. They were negotiating a plea deal in the 9-11 case. Finally. That same spring is when I started listening in on the peaceful tomorrow's Zoom meetings. Colleen and the rest of the group knew a clear agreement and sentencing would take some time. One attorney on the case estimated 18 months. Their strategy was to stay cool, which the lawyers negotiating the deal had also recommended. Yes, the plea talks had been in the papers, the news was out there, but still they decided, let's not make a lot of noise, no big public push. The risk of riling up opposition was too great. This thing was so fragile politically, even minor blowback could snuff it out. So, they'd lie low. The meetings, though, were animated. The group worked on a list of questions they wanted the defendants to answer in the event of a sentencing. Questions some of them have harbored since 2001.

They want to know who was the financial mastermind. Was it KSM's nephew? Amarabaluchi.

did he communicate to so-and-so that he was making this transaction? Is that maybe what you're more after?

The finances are a big topic with this group. Not only because they want to understand the inner workings of the plot, but because they want to understand the relative guilt of the five defendants. Is a Mara Abelucci less culpable than his uncle, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, but more culpable than Mustafa Al-Haussawi? They passed their questions along to a defense attorney working on the 9-11 case, a defense attorney. At first, this surprised me, but they were talking to defense attorneys as much if not more than they were talking to prosecutors. And then, they waited. Six months passed, eight months by December, nine months since the police negotiation started. Everyone was getting antsy.

Hearings in the 9-11 case were on hold while the prosecution and defense tried to work it out. There were supposed to agree on so-called policy principles by now, which is a dry term but it was the meat of the deal. If the men pleaded guilty, what would they get in return? The policy principles mostly had to deal with the conditions of the men's imprisonment. They wanted assurances that as long as they were in prison, they'd have a communal situation like they have now. The ability to eat together and pray together. No solitary confinement. Also, they wanted proper, sustained treatment for their physical and psychological trauma caused by the torture. And the ability to communicate better with their families. For the plea to progress, the prosecution needed an answer from the Biden administration, whether they supported the policy principles. But Biden wasn't saying anything at all. In the peaceful tomorrow's Zoom calls, people started asking, what should we do? Should we stop our feet? Terry reminded everyone, the lead attorney for a moral blue cheek. Jake can now. Who's still advising? No.

The one year Mark came and went. Now it was March of 2023. Still nothing. Valerie's cat was dying. Liz's wedding was off. She was now running for mayor. Phil is suggested maybe they take a breather and get some distance from all the discouragement. Jay Canal came to a meeting to give an update, which was no update on the deal really, but he did have something to tell them.

That's the document Colleen and the others are waiting for. The main thing they want from this plea. In the 200 page statement, Jay's client, Amar Abelucci, had laid out his background how he ended up in the situation at such a young age. Then he talks about 9-11.

Finally, there's a section about what happened to him in prison.

Liz has a holy shit look on her face. Later she told me that's what she was feeling. Holy shit, this information is out there. And why do we not have it? One of the five defendants had answered their questions, and a document they couldn't see, not yet. Not unless there was a plea, but it was something. And then, August of last year, the public suddenly woke up. It was the government who woke them, not peaceful tomorrow's. The prosecution sent a letter to 911 victim family members to a much wider group than usual. Some of whom hadn't been contacted about this case and forever, letting them know the pleyn negotiations were happening and seeking their opinions or concerns. And oh, man, did they need an editor for this letter? Robotically matter of fact, lousy with acronyms. Sure enough, nearly a year and a half after the pleyn negotiations had first been reported, a whole new crop of people did have opinions and concerns. They called the prosecution office. They called the press. They called Capitol Hill. The AP ran a story. Clean negotiations could mean no 911 defendants face the death penalty. The US tells families. Conservatives made immediate hay. Ted Cruz took to his podcast.

Family members expressed outrage on TV.

More than 2,000 victim family members wrote an open letter to the president, protesting the plea deal. Peaceful tomorrow's members were feeling like, ugh, if they could just gather all the family members in the same room and explain everything they knew about how broke in the military commissions were. Maybe the others would see, they were never going to get a trial or the death penalty. If they wanted answers or any shred of accountability, a plea deal was the best they could hope for. Within a couple of weeks, President Biden broke his silence regarding the plea deals. Well, he never said anything publicly, but a line in a prosecution court filing said the Biden administration declined the so-called policy principles. Biden was not on board. He would not support an assurance of no solitary confinement or an assurance of torture rehabilitation. For the past year and a half, no one had seemed clear on what rule the White House was playing in these unprecedented plenagotiations, and this unprecedented criminal case in this unprecedented court. Maybe the president really disagreed with the terms of the deal, or maybe in September of 2023, it just came down to Royale Polyteque. He's coming up on an election, and perhaps the mother of all bad Guantanamo headlines is the one that says you're negotiating sleeping arrangements in therapy with Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, the man who claimed to have beheaded Daniel Pearl, an orchestrated the most devastating terror attack in modern history. So, I kept thinking about Colleen, how on earth did she have this stamina for this? I would have given up years ago, probably a decade ago, found some way to talk myself out of caring anymore. I'd asked her, was that the hardest part, just staying with it?

No. because I'm so stubborn. Seriously, being stubborn, like I'm not gonna let their failure be mine as well. I'm sticking with this, I'm not giving up until this ends some way. Somehow, I'm not giving up.

And so, Colleen headed down to Guantanamo. That's after the break.

because of the clean negotiations and before that, COVID. The 9-11 case hadn't seen much court action since 2019. Now, September of 2023, the whole enterprise cranked back up again. For the 9-11 case, that's five teams of roughly 20 people per team, lawyers and interpreters and analysts than the judge and his staff, plus observers and reporters and their minors and escorts, maybe 150 people, heaving themselves to Cuba, including Colleen. I traveled alongside Colleen, she hadn't been to Guantanamo for three and a half years. She was in a brighter mood than I expected. At the hotel, she joked that the complimentary laundry pods in her room might be listening devices.

It would be through all thrown in the washer, that's what activates it to like send the

I didn't see Colleen all that much during the week. At Guantanamo, the VFMs are closely guarded and protected, mostly in an effort to keep media away from them. So it felt almost illegal to seek her out. In the courtroom gallery, we'd nod to each other self-consciously as I walk by the VFM section to get to my seat. It was a strange split-screen experience to watch this pretrial hearing, knowing, or at least strongly believing, none of this is leading to an actual verdict. But also, it's court. So it's interesting. People arguing passionately about secrecy and the constitution, witnesses testifying, nervously, or testily. Within the larger narrative of an action, there's a lot of action. This week's hearing, they were dealing with the crux of the case, whether statements the defendants made in 2007, after they got to Guantanamo and were no longer in CIA custody, whether those statements could be used as evidence at trial. The statements which are critical to the prosecution are known as the clean team statements, since they were taken by teams of government investigators who were not CIA and were not the government argues using any form of coercion. The defense wants the clean team statements thrown out, arguing among other reasons that they are tainted. A backdoor way for torture derived evidence to enter the trial, and that the interviews were not truly voluntary. Not to mention that the men were never sufficiently informed of their rights in these interviews, or allowed a lawyer. The fight over whether to suppress these statements has been going on, you'll be shocked to learn, for many years, in many different forms. The week we were there, the excitement was that former FBI agent Frank Pelagrino was going to be testifying. The agent who took a clean statement from Khalid Sheikh Muhammad at Guantanamo. He'd been after KSM for years, prior to September 11th, probably knew more about him than anyone in law enforcement. Heligrino's testimony seemed great for the prosecution. He came across as credible, said KSM answered his questions voluntarily, that he even cracked a joke or two. But Peligrino also seemed restive with anger, at the position the CIA had put him and other FBI agents in, because of the black sites and the torture. Under questioning, Palagrino said, quote, I think that the whole thing from the beginning was a flaming bag of crap that we got stuck with, unquote. One defense attorney told me, it was the first time a witness had said something so plainly critical of the torture program since the proceedings began, a dozen years ago. A couple other significant things that happened to hugely significant. The week before the judge had severed Ramsey Binnell's Shaba from the 9-11 case, deciding after about a decade of litigation that he was mentally incompetent to aid in his own defense. Ramsey Binnell's Shaba is generally considered the second most culpable of the five defendants, sort of like KSM's deputy. The other major news was that a month earlier, a judge in the other death penalty case before the military commissions against the Saudi Man accused of orchestrating the deadly bombing of the USS coal in 2000, that judge threw out the clean team statements in the coal case, saying they were tainted by torture. These developments seemed to me to point in the direction of pleadials. The 9-11 case seemed like it was disintegrating. I'd come down to Guantanamo thinking the plea deals were dead, but everyone was saying they're not, really they're not. We just have to find a different way to get them done. Jake and Elto reporters, the plea deals are sleeping, not in a coma, sleeping. Most evenings a bunch of us reporters hang out on outdoor couches in the hotel's courtyard. Contract workers often sit at the tables nearby, everybody drinking. While the leggy stray cats of Guantanamo dart around the edges of the patio, Carol Rosenberg sometimes feeds them her leftovers. Colleen came to join us a couple times to talk about the case and also to reminisce. She's known most of these reporters for years. She was with a few of them on a flight so notoriously terrifying that people still talk about it. John Ryan was on that flight, so it was Carol.

Also, Terry McDermott, a former investigative reporter for the LA Times, who now writes books, including The Hunt for KSM, which Colleen is red. He was on that flight, and he's back here now.

I'm not a war reporter, but I imagine this is sort of what it's like after hours, minus the danger. People thrown together trying to make sense of a protracted battle. The so-called war on terror has been enormous, global. And yet sitting here, it can feel like the whole thing is funneled down to this small clatch of people. Reporters, victims, attorneys, soldiers, drinking in the courtyard of the Navy gateway in and sweet. We start talking about how this case ends. Clean deals, John Ryan says, 100%. Terry agrees, there's never going to be a trial. Carol thinks maybe an abatement could happen, but at some point the judge might say, okay, government, if you won't produce CIA witnesses, then I'm going to pull the plug. Everybody go home until you're ready to make this a fair trial, which could mean no resolution at all. One night, Jake and now, the defense attorney turns up. He's wearing shorts and sandals, a brace on his ankle from an injury sustained and spin-class. He grabs a club soda. I ask him, all these things that are happening. The decision to sever Ramsey-Binnell Shaba, the USS Cole Judges ruling on the clean team statements, the flaming pile of crap. Does it feel like this case might be crumbling in the defense's favor? He says, look, I know you've been down here before.

Jay's been on this case full time since 2011. He's the one who used to make predictions. It'll take four years to get to trial. He said at the beginning. Okay, five years. In 2018, he stopped time stamping. The most he'll say now is that we're in the middle of the case, the middle. How long the middle lasts, anyone's guess, at least a couple more years. Maybe longer. J believes in the rightness of his mission, that the U.S. government's power cannot go unchecked or trample human rights. He tries not to get caught up in what should happen or could happen. He says he's going to stick with this case as long as it takes. But for a minute there, he really thought this thing might end, that the plea deals would materialize, maybe by the end of 2022. He started planning his next move, entertainment law, wants to work in the music industry, even ordered slick new business cards, the kind that feel like a credit card. Do you ever get the sense that the prosecution feels exactly the same way you guys do on the defense side that everyone is just like we're locked in this like falling apart train that just keeps going.

The prosecutors weren't permitted to discuss the case with me on the record. So I can't say whether they share Jay's revenge fantasy feeling. But the prosecution were the ones who initiated the Pline negotiations two years ago, as the road to trial was getting only longer and darker. They want this show over to. Toward the end of the week, I checked in with Colleen one last time. She'd been up since 3am, she said, her mind had been churning. So she said she wrote it all down to get her thoughts outside her body. She'd underestimated how sad this trip was for her.

I never cried on here. I mean, like, yeah, this is like the third time I cried on it. I don't usually cry down here. And I'm not saying that's like good or bad, just is what it is. There was just, this trip was really emotional.

I'd seen some of that earlier in the week. Within 24 hours of our arrival, I'd gone to find her in her hotel room a couple floors below mine. She was falling apart a little, missing her brother, worried she couldn't remember his voice anymore. And also just being down here again, watching this case rattle back to life.

I think I've pinned a lot of my hope for accountability and getting to the bottom of this on some kind of illegal process because, you know, it just feels like Jesus. He was murdered. Somebody like be responsible for that.

This side of Colleen, I wasn't familiar with. I'd seen only confident, rigorous, determined Colleen, but never Colleen in despair.

You know, I feel like I've said this to 20,000 times, but like, I'm really feeling this now. I don't know that there's ever that this is ever going to happen. I don't know that there will ever be a trial. I've never, I've never felt, I've never questioned it as strongly as I am now.

Waiting 20 years for a trial doesn't just deny Colleen answers. Year after year after year, it prolongs her grief. Makes dealing with her brother's death harder if such a thing is possible. By the end of the week, Colleen was more collected. She told me the VFM said met with a defense the night before. She cried a lot at that meeting too, she said. Like Jake and Elle, she knows better than to get her hopes up. But she realized she'd gotten her hopes up. About a plea deal. The lawyers had talked about how close they'd come, really kind of close to a deal. In the meeting, Colleen had aired her most cynical and she worries possibly her most realistic analysis of how this all ends, which is nothing. No trial, no plea deal, no ending. and that that nothingness, that is the plan. A plan that would serve the interests of some powerful stakeholders, namely the CIA, which would never have to reveal the identities of the people who conducted and enabled torture, or the countries where it all happened. Also, the detainees, who could quietly stay here at Guantanamo in the communal confinement they want, presumed innocent until they die, forgotten. The politicians who could keep kicking this toxic can farther and farther into the distance, keep pretending it's out of their hands. Who this plan doesn't serve, of course, is Colleen. A post-cript, and perhaps an antidote to this dullerist trip, While we were at Guantanamo, another peaceful tomorrow's member was there, too. Leyla Murphy. Her week was so different from colleagues. She was so different from Colleen. In the past few years, as founding members of peaceful tomorrow's have grown and firmer died, a bunch of young people have joined. Their children have 9-11 victims. Leyla and her sister Jessica, Liz, Aiden, a young woman named Chanel started coming to the Zoom meetings in November. Obviously they're self-selecting, but a remarkable number of these 9-11 kids have studied Arabic and the Middle East or spent time there. Leyla is becoming a lawyer. She wants to do criminal defense. Her sisters in med school, she's interested in the effects of torture on human health. The Murphy sisters have joked, darkly, that this was KSM's plan all along. To radicalize the children of 9-11 victims against their own government. During the day at Guantanamo, Leyla met with attorneys to copious notes during court. She was with two other young people, one of fellow lost student, another recently minted lawyer. In the evenings, they did what young people do. Played cornhole at the T.C. bar. Played tennis or pickleball.

It's not that Leyla was living it up. It's that she seemed to have no expectations from this trip. She was an observer in the literal sense, taking it in, noting it down. She admires Colleen and Terry and the other members of this group, but she doesn't need what they need. She's not waiting for answers from the 9-11 accused. She doesn't need a trial, and sure a plea deal would be good. She'll lobby for that, but whatever happens to these five aging defendants, she doubts it'll have meaning for her. What Leyla wants, what would be most meaningful to her, is an admission of guilt from the U.S. government.

Layla's voice dropped. A guy in military uniform was walking past. Close enough to hear us. I understood her trepidation. It feels somehow heretical, or at least ungrateful, with all these soldiers and sailors around. For Layla to say, all the governments post 9-11 effort, the endless war and the prison and the court. I know. You did it for me. You did it in my name. But none of it worked. So it's time to stop now. Just say you made a huge mistake and that you're sorry. Leila knows it's a long shot. She was three years old when her father died in 2001, and in all the time since the government has never held itself accountable, has never worked to reset our common morality as a country. But this young person who's about to become a lawyer, it'd be so great if she could have this little bit of hope in the forces of the rule of law. Serials produced by Jessica Weisberg, Dana Chivas and me, are editor is Julie Snyder, additional reporting by Chora Currier, fact checking by Ben Falen and Kelsey Kudak, music supervision sound design and mixing by Phoebe Wang, original score by Sophia Dele Elisandri, editing help from Ira Glass, Gen Guera and Diane Wu. Our contributing editors are Carol Rosenberg, John Ryan, and Ruzina Ali. Additional production from Emma Grillo, Alvin Melleth, and Daniel Gimeth. Our standards editor is Susan Westling, legal review from Alameen, Sumar, and Maya Gandhi. The art for our show comes from Pablo Delcan and Max Guter. Supervising producer for Cero Productions is N-Day Chubo. Our executive assistant is Mac Miller. Sam Dolnik is Deputy Managing Editor of the New York Times. Special thanks to Scott Reem, David Kestenbaum, Peter Blair, Harvey Rishakov, Gary Brown, Ryan Meiser, and all the incredibly patient attorneys who worked at Guantanamo Bay and took the time to explain it to us. And to everyone at Peaceful Tumaros who allowed us to sit in on their meetings. Thanks also to Jeff Melman, Ben Shire and Ben Thorpe Brown.