Transcript for Ep 132 Osteogenesis Imperfecta: All bones about it

SPEAKER_01

00:01 - 00:03

This is exactly right.

SPEAKER_03

00:06 - 11:26

So the day I was born had some quirks. First, it was the most beloved of national holidays, Groundhog Day. It was an Appalachian February full of blustery snow. And this is my favorite part. My dad's truck broke down on the way to meet my mom at the hospital. So he caught a ride with my uncle Tommy and their good buddy, peanut. That's all fine, not atypical, but there was one specific quirk about that day that's important. I was born with a broken collarbone. At the time, this was not super concerning. The concerning part happened 10 weeks later when I was kicking around in my crib, just doing my baby thing, and my mom heard a snap and a screen. She rushed me to the ER and the X-rays showed a broken femur. To make a long story short, way shorter because you can imagine the questions my parents had to answer about that. I was eventually diagnosed with a rare bone disease called osteogenesis in perfecta, which we call OI, or brittle bones for short, because osteogenesis in perfecta is a mouthful. I was born in 1981, and I think, at the time, there were just a few types. Now, there are even more ranging from incredibly severe to very mild. Mine is a mild form. Mostly, my OI seems to affect the long bones of my legs. I've broken my fingers. numerous times, which is not a bone that typically breaks without major efforts. And even though my bones are the most obvious part of my body affected by OI, it evidences in other ways, in my body to, it affects my teeth, which is it common for every person with OI, but mine have always broken very easily. I have some intense scoliosis, which again, not everybody has, but it's not uncommon. As an adult, I am a towering four foot nine. I work with kids a lot and they always think it's awesome that I'm usually smaller than they are. The whites of my eyes are a little bit blue. That's a common part of OI called blue scolera. So it definitely shows up in my body in all kinds of ways. And obviously, because my body is the vehicle through which I experience life, it shows up in my life in all kinds of ways. Somebody recently asked me if growing up was hard because of my bones. And my first thought, honestly, is that my childhood was really great. I have the coolest, funnyest and most genuinely kind parents. They already had my older sister Bridget when I came along. And of course, the three of them weren't expecting to have a baby with a disability, but I never felt anything but loved. As an adult, I'm especially amazed that they didn't have a Google to read about, oh, I, they didn't have anything like, whether indeed a freak out over all the what it together. There was no support group on Facebook. They could use for questions. The three of them just had each other and somehow they helped me learn to move through the world a world that's definitely not made for all bodies with some independence and with a whole lot of joy. My brother came along five years later and he also has a wife. We both used a wheelchair and a walker. Most of the time when we were kids because our bones were weak but our parents would just load them up and we would still go on family vacations or go hang out with family. My mom would pull me through her garden in a wagon. My dad would back the wheelchair up into my grandparents' house every weekend so I could hang out with them. My big sister who was always so much cooler and more fun and more awesome would still take me out and do things with me. So with my family, I never felt left out. School was a little bit different and of course it would be. The word I usually heard people describe me with was fragile. And for a good reason, any adult at a school would want kids to be extra careful around you. Sports were huge in my small town, and naturally any kind of complex sport was a heck no for me. But as my friends got more and more into sports, I've full on and embraced my nerds self, and I got into books. I love to read. And I realize pretty soon I love to write. And even if I weren't disabled, I would have loved writing. But I I think my disability was a conduit to the early realization that my imagination is limitless. In the actual physical world, my body has limits. Sometimes a lot of them, but my imagination doesn't, and it never has. And I learned how to flex my imagination like a muscle. It's another way about through the trauma that can come with a live, a specific memory I have or that would be when I would break my leg. and I would be the hospital waiting to get it set, which is a very painful process. And as that was happening, I would close my eyes and I would imagine Narnia. I would think about, as late from the line, the witch in the wardrobe, right, and what his fur would feel like between my fingers, or I would imagine what his roar sounded like, and if I could feel it inside my chest, and that made me feel brave. And I think that's where I realized fiction has the very real benefit of helping me realize how brave I can be. So it got me through some of that because at the top of OI I had my bones did get a little stronger as I got older. There's no cure for OI so my bones are always going to be fragile but around the time I started high school I was able to walk independently without a walker or wheelchair as long as I was careful. And I realize then, for me at least, sometimes it's just as hard if not harder to advocate for your body and your health when your disability seems invisible, even though it isn't, even though it's something that still dictates everything you do in a day. As an adult, especially lately, OI has affected my career, but not in a way I thought it would. I actually get to write for a living, which has been mentoring jobs since I was in third grade. Specifically, I get to write novels for kids to me. Those novels that we read as kids are at the best books. Those are the books that helped me church through the dark that helped me realize how bright I could be. My first novel for kids was published in 2014 with Scholastic. My first novel was a contemporary fantasy called The Snicker of Magic, and I got to keep writing more and more after that, and I love it. But I had never written character like me who had OI until now. My most recent novel, Hummingbird, came out in August of 2022. And this one is about the girl named Olive, who is homeschooled because she also has osteogenesis and perfecta, and her parents are kind of nervous about Olive attending a public school. But she talks them into it, she goes, and the first day of sixth grade is a disaster. A sixth-grade octave is until she hears a story about an enchanted creature in the woods that grants wishes, and she decides she is going to find it. Now, obviously, all of, like I said, has brutal bones, her OIs mild like mine. And it first, this was a big part of her story, because honestly, I didn't know if people wanted to really read about how I felt about my disability. The most common line I see in books when a character is disabled is something like my disability is my superpower, which is awesome, but it's not always how I feel. Most days I love my life and I'm grateful for my body. I'm grateful I get the experience life inside it, but my body also breaks for seemingly no reason sometimes and that can be frustrating and painful. I always say my relations with my body will be the most complicated I have in my life and that's true, but who would want to read that? So at first when I was writing about all of, I just wanted her to be fully completely confident in herself, figuring out her own way to move through the world, magic, adventure, first, precious, all of that could stuff, but it's like I couldn't find the heart of her story. And then in 2019, I was walking through the kitchen one night to check the door locks and I slipped in dog drool. And as I was following, I heard the snap that watery, sick main parable sound. And then came this flood of pain because breaking your finger isn't no joke. And in the months after that, I remember what it feels like to be in that specific place again, to be in physical therapy again, nervous every time something hurts, to not be able to get in some buildings again, because there's no access to them. And one night I was playing Mario on the couch beside my husband having an intense pity party for myself. And I said, I'm broken and I hate my body and I'm frustrated. And he very gently said, Hey, your legs broken. You weren't broken. And that's what gave me the clarity I needed to write hummingbird in a way that was absolutely true to me. All of an I both love our families. We both love dolly part and we both are made to size life and we see the magic in it. And we both have this disability that is sometimes really frustrating, especially all of say she's 12 in the story. She is seeing how bodies are changing all around her and how hers isn't or how it is changing but not quite the same way. And that can be tough. It was tough for me at least. I remember what it was like to feel left out to be called fragile, but I also remember the people in my life who love me and who called out every good thing. Instead, my parents, my siblings, now Justin, my husband, my friends, they've all helped me find these doorways into my imagination and they've helped me make the life I love. that I'm really proud of. So in the story, all of actually sets out thinking she is going to wish away her ROI. But I won't spoil it until you what happens. But I will say that like all of, I still believe a person's body is the least interesting thing about them. But having said that, I'm more passionate than ever about writing books for every kind of kid. and everybody feels accepted and loved and knows they have a place to belong. No matter how old we are, I think we all just want to know somebody say any seat for us in the cafeteria. And because of that book, I am talking a lot about OI now and how it looks in my life. Specifically, when I talk to kids, there is one scene I bring up. There is a scene where all of wonders if she's ever going to have a big life because of her body. She's experiencing gym class for the first time. And that's when her self-esteem really starts to take because she sees how different bodies look. Since she starts asking the big questions, what if nobody ever wants to go out with me because my body doesn't look like other people's bodies? What if I can't have the career I want to have because of how I look all of the big hard stuff? And the answer to that question, this is what I tell kids, even though it's kind of corny. Yes, you get to have a big amazing life. In the body you're in, you get to fall in love, you get to have adventures and experience so much joy. This is all one small part of a really big story. And I hope other kids with OI have never ever doubted that. Maybe they haven't. And that would be awesome. But just in case there's somebody out there wondering, like I did, a body there and will hinder them from living, the life they want to have, it won't. I hope kids who read the book know there's magic out there waiting for them. They get to experience it in the body there and they deserve a free good thing. To end, I'll say that in the story there is a line when all of says my bones are fragile but I am not. And that is how I feel about my body too.

SPEAKER_00

11:36 - 11:36

Thank you.

SPEAKER_04

12:13 - 12:22

Oh my gosh, Natalie, thank you so, so much for sharing your story. Like, that was absolutely amazing.

SPEAKER_01

12:22 - 12:28

Yeah, thank you for sharing it with us and all of our listeners and so many more with your book.

SPEAKER_02

12:28 - 12:29

Yes, oh my gosh.

SPEAKER_04

12:29 - 12:57

Okay, everyone right now go out pick up a copy of hummingbird by Natalie Lloyd. It is amazing. I cannot recommend it highly enough. I laughed. I cried. I like I could not put it down and Natalie has so many other books so you can find them all on her website, Natalieloid.com and we will also post a link to where you can find all of Natalie's books on our show notes for this episode as well as on our website for this episode.

SPEAKER_02

12:58 - 13:10

We sure will. Hi, I'm Erin Welch, and I'm Erin Almanupdike. And this is this podcast, we'll kill you. And today we're talking about osteogenesis imperfecta.

SPEAKER_04

13:10 - 13:31

We certainly are. This is a really interesting one because I know we've been doing more non-infectious diseases like as the seasons have gone on. But it's just amazing how each one of them sort of gives us this opportunity to look at something totally different that we never really get to think about like collagen.

SPEAKER_01

13:34 - 13:38

What the, it's been since season two that we've talked about collagen.

SPEAKER_04

13:38 - 13:43

I know I kept thinking collagen is the pull and peel twizzlers. Is that yes?

SPEAKER_01

13:43 - 13:49

Okay. Oh my gosh. I did. You basically took my whole biology section done.

SPEAKER_04

13:49 - 13:55

Done onto the history. Just kidding, just kidding. We do have a lot to cover today.

SPEAKER_02

13:55 - 14:08

And so maybe we should start by getting into quarantine anytime. Absolutely. What are we drinking this week, Aaron? This week, Aaron.

SPEAKER_04

14:08 - 14:13

I love this. Me too. We're drinking the collagen phase.

SPEAKER_01

14:16 - 14:20

It's just amazing. It's so good that I can't believe that we've never done it before.

SPEAKER_04

14:20 - 14:29

I know we both scroll through. I like our entire page of quarantine is looking for it. The collagen doesn't appear in the title, right?

SPEAKER_01

14:29 - 14:40

Yeah, which look, I mean, clearly we need to do more collagen-based diseases for sure. There's so many other options. Or sure. But in any case, what's in a collagen phase?

SPEAKER_04

14:40 - 15:03

A collagen phase is just a simple twist variant on your standard gen phase. It has gin, naturally. It has collagen. It has collagen. It actually kind of does. It has passion fruit juice. It has lime juice, simple syrup, club soda, and of course for the collagen part. Egg white foam.

SPEAKER_01

15:03 - 15:13

Got to love that. Yeah. We'll post the full recipe for that quarantine as well as our non-alcoholic placebo read up on our website. This podcast will kill you.com. There's no end to what you can find.

SPEAKER_04

15:25 - 15:48

There's transcripts. There's sources for each and every one of our episodes. There's music by bloodmobile. Check it out. There are links to bookshop.org affiliate account and our goodreads list. There's links to merch, which is pretty sweet if you ask me. There's a link to Patreon. There's a little about a section that is woefully outdated.

SPEAKER_02

15:48 - 15:48

woefully.

SPEAKER_01

15:48 - 15:54

I just looked at it and I was like, oh, yep. At least we updated it since we graduated, but it's been a minute.

SPEAKER_04

15:56 - 16:08

I have avoided looking at it because I'm like, this is, it's gonna make me want to do something and I don't want to do something about it right now. Anyway, lots of stuff on our website, check it out.

SPEAKER_01

16:08 - 16:14

Well, with that, should we get into the biology of this disorder?

SPEAKER_04

16:14 - 16:17

We absolutely should, right after this break.

SPEAKER_01

16:48 - 19:10

osteogenesis imperfecta is also called brittle bone disease. And that moniker exists because the main symptom or consequence rather of osteogenesis imperfecta is, in fact, bones that are very prone to fracture, bones that break easily and are brittle. But of course, it's a bit more complicated than that. And in fact, osteogenesis imperfecta is a lot more complicated than I realized when we decided to do this episode, I had no idea. It's classic, classic, right? Yeah. So historically speaking, and I promise I'm not stepping on your toes, Aaron, how dare you? I say the word history, and then I have to qualify it. But historically speaking, osteogenesis imperfecta had been classified into like four different subgroups, types one through four. Type one was considered relatively mild and by far considered the most common type of osteogenesis imperfecta. Type two was the most severe and actually lethal, paranoidly, so either shortly before birth or after birth. Type 3 was considered relatively severe and progressive, and then type 4 was considered the most moderate. So somewhere in between types 1 and type 3. Nowadays, though, this classification system does not hold up because we have now identified dozens of potential mutations that are involved and a very wide range of clinical phenotypes or the way that osteogenesis imperfecta presents. And so what we know now is that at its core, no matter what the mutation or mutations are that are involved, and we'll get there. We'll talk about all of that. But osteogenesis imperfecta is broadly speaking, a disorder of collagen formation. So to understand it, let's start first with collagen. Yay, good. And for this, we can harken back to our scurvy episode, all the way back in season two.

SPEAKER_02

19:10 - 19:13

Still one of my all-time faves, I think. Same.

SPEAKER_01

19:13 - 20:31

Same. Such a great episode. Super fun. If you haven't listened, check it out. But collagen is integral to the story of scurvy, just as it's integral to the story of osteogenesis in perfecta. So collagen is a protein. It's a whole bunch of proteins, structural proteins that happen to be one of if not the most common proteins in our human bodies. and proteins are simply chains of amino acids. That's really all they are. And in the case of collagen, collagen is made of a few different specific amino acids, glycine, proline, hydroxyproline, hydroxylycine, and probably some others, but glycine is an important one. And in a collagen protein, here is the way that it forms. amino acids make chains. They link together to form chains. These chains are called pro-colligence. Three of these chains have to then twist together in a certain way in what's called a triple helix. So if you think of our DNA as being a double helix, this is a triple helix. And this triple helix is what you mentioned Aaron, you can think of it like a pull and peel twistler.

SPEAKER_04

20:31 - 20:35

Right? Exactly what is I'm picturing in my head right now. Yes.

SPEAKER_01

20:35 - 22:16

That is what you should be picturing. But then multiple of these twizzlers, multiple of these triple helices, have to then come together in a fairly complex way to form the larger scale fibers and networks that make up collagen as a whole protein. And collagen or collagen happen to be pretty important proteins, like I said. Some papers will tell you that 30% of the dry weight of our body is collagen. I saw that. Yeah, it's massive. I had no idea. Like me either. My new collagen was a big deal, but I didn't know that big of a deal. And it's not just collagen as I've alluded to. There are in fact five different types of collagen, types one through five that make up literally so many parts of our body. These are structural proteins. Collagen makes up our blood vessels, our muscles, our skin, our cartilage, our connective tissue, the basement membranes, which is like where one layer of cells might change to a different type of cells. They make up our hair and of course, our bones integral to today's episode. Of these five different types of collagen, our bones are primarily made up of type 1 collagen, which then becomes mineralized to form our hard bones. But type 1 collagen is not only found in our bones. It's also an important component of our skin, of our tendons, of our blood vessels, and even the structure of a lot of our organs.

SPEAKER_04

22:16 - 22:28

Can I just throw out the etymology of college in real quick? Because I don't have it in my history. It basically means like glue generating.

SPEAKER_01

22:28 - 22:43

I love that. Yeah, that's very accurate. Like college and holds us together. Yeah, exactly. Beautiful. So. Collagen, it's a complex protein. I just keep saying collagen as if it's singular. It's many colleges.

SPEAKER_04

22:43 - 22:51

I mean, we also talk about osteogenesis imperfecta as a disorder and it's certainly not a disorder.

SPEAKER_01

22:51 - 26:07

So forgive us for the grammatical errors here. But because these are complex proteins, it is then understandable that there are a lot of places where things could get a little wonky. And we talked about some of that in our scurvy episode. There is some like deep biochemistry that we could get into about like the triplet complexes and how they have to form with every third amino acid being glycine and et cetera, et cetera. But if we just think of making a protein as starting with a set of building blocks, like connects, those are the best ones I can think of. You know those toys? Yeah, yeah. So if each of these blocks are amino acids, these have to fit together to make a specific type of strand, and then each of these strands have to fit together in this precise way for this triple helix to be formed in the correct way so that it's strong enough. and able to then fold and twist together to build larger structures. At any and all of these levels at the amino acid level or at the triple helix level or at the larger structural level, there could be things that get a little bit messed up. and therefore cause issues with the strength of that collagen. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a group of genetic-based disorders of collagen production, either affecting the quantity of collagen that's produced or the quality of that collagen. That's what it is at its core. So older textbooks, like I mentioned, older papers will describe it specifically as an autosomal dominant disorder, meaning that it's coming from a mutation in a gene on not our sex chromosomes, but our autosomes, and that will cause disease even with just one copy present. As opposed to lots of the other genetic diseases that we've covered on the podcast where you have to have two copies of a mutated gene to be able to have disease like cystic fibrosis or sickle cell. And that's because that in the past osteogenesis imperfecta was considered to be caused by mutations specifically in one of two genes, COL1A1 and COL1A2. And these are two genes that encode for our type 1 collagen, the most abundant form of collagen in our bones and our skin and tendons and lots of other things. And it is still true that the vast majority of cases of osteogenesis imperfecta, about 85 to 90% of cases, are caused in this way by autosomal dominant mutations in these two genes, or at least one of these two genes. The genes that are encoding for type one collagen, but not every case of osteogenesis and perfective fits that description. And even within that, there are so many different specific mutations that can occur.

SPEAKER_04

26:09 - 26:27

And that, I mean, it kind of reminds me to some degree of cystic fibrosis where there's like a whole different array of mutations and downstream effects and where it happens and when it happens and what the results are and stuff like that.

SPEAKER_01

26:27 - 27:30

Yes, 100%. In our cystic fibrosis episode, we talked a lot about that. And to reflect that, there are no longer considered only four classes of osteogenesis in perfecta. Most papers that I read said there's about 19 or 20, depending on the phenotype or clinical presentation, at least one paper that I read proposed an entirely different classification system that grouped osteogenesis imperfective by metabolism and phenotype into a through e and then subgroupings within each of those. complicated. But the point is we now know there are dozens of different specific genetic mutations in a whole bunch of different genes and locations on different genes on various chromosomes at this point, but they all end up affecting either the production of type 1 collagen or the formation or the folding or the mechanics of type 1 collagen.

SPEAKER_04

27:31 - 27:53

Can I ask a question about the typing system? Sure. Are the types more about the end result? Are they more about the mutation itself leading to the end result? Or are it does there exist like a functional typing system with different treatment protocols or diagnostic criteria or something like that?

SPEAKER_01

27:54 - 30:30

Yeah, great question. So when it comes to the typing of osteogenesis and perfecta from what I can tell it's still a little bit messy and maybe like in the process of undergoing revision because there are different papers that proposed different ideas on how to classify it. Okay. But a lot of effort has been made to try and link known genotypes, so like known and found specific mutations to people, to individuals that are living with osteogenesis and perfecta, regardless of the symptoms, if that makes sense. Okay, because as we all talk about one hope is for things like gene therapy or targeted therapy and so knowing what the mutations are help in that respect, but as we'll also talk about in some ways, you can also treat more broadly, if that makes sense. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So kind of both end. But it is true that these different mutations can lead to really variable degrees of disruption to the structure of collagen and therefore really huge variation in terms of symptoms and clinical findings. The way that I think of it is depending on what the mutation is, you can think of replacing that sturdy twizzler rope that you could use to build stuff or like the connects rope. with like cooked spaghetti noodles or uncooked spaghetti noodles or like a nylon rope that's like slippery or right like just a lot of different ways that things could change that all lead to bones that are more easily fractured but not necessarily all in the same way. Now another important part of the story of osteogenesis and perfect is that not all mutations involve the formation of collagen. One of the most common mutations is in fact a null mutation that causes normal collagen production, but at half the amount that is typical. Okay. So you can imagine that collagen that is formed the way that it should be has the same strength, but because you just have less of it, the overall symptoms tend to be a lot less severe. Okay. So this is often associated with that old school classification of type one osteogenesis imperfecta.

SPEAKER_02

30:30 - 30:30

Right.

SPEAKER_04

30:30 - 30:45

Right. And so just like going with the pull and peel because that is that my framework for this that would be like a pull and peel in half. Uh-huh. Exactly. Or like half of this strength. Right.

SPEAKER_01

30:45 - 34:21

So speaking of which, shall we talk about what the symptoms are? Mm-hmm. All right. So I said already, there's a really wide range of phenotypes, but they all share a lot of things in common, most notably fractures, bones that break easily, result in many often fractures. In more severe cases, we can be talking about dozens to even hundreds of fractures, even early in childhood. Other really common findings are things like short stature varying degrees of bony deformity. So this could be things like bowing of the bones of the legs or curvatures in the spine like scoliosis or even curvatures in the bones of the hand. And these types of changes can happen both as a result of the bones themselves, just not being as structurally sound, like not able to support the weight of the body and from the fractures themselves and the remodeling thereafter, especially when it comes to fractures in the spine that can end up leading to scoliosis, for example. Another really common finding in osteogenesis imperfecta is blue sclera. So the whites of the eyes appearing blue. And this is kind of described in a lot of medical textbooks as one of those very classic osteogenesis imperfecta findings. Importantly, it can also sometimes be a normal finding in newborns. But this is caused by thin, sclaral collagen. So the collagen in the eye is just not as thick. So then the underlying vascular church in our eyes is more prominent because of that. So they appear blue, like the whites of the eyes. Hearing loss is another really common symptom. It's not always present and it's not always severe hearing loss or complete hearing loss. But it often happens especially with time and by the time people reach adulthood. And this can result either from damage to or disruption of the bones in the middle ear and can result in like really wide variation and degree of hearing loss. And then, dintinogenesis imperfecta, which dintin is your teeth. This is something that can be found more commonly in the more severe forums of osteogenesis imperfecta, but it essentially is when teeth, especially baby teeth, much more than adult teeth, which I find very interesting and I don't have a great explanation for. are not fully formed, they're small and they often appear either like yellow brown or gray blue and they are a lot weaker than a typical tooth or a typical baby tooth even is. So those are kind of the main symptoms of all of the various forms of osteogenesis imperfecta, the degree to which this causes impairment, either physical disability or leads to chronic illness really can vary. Some people might not ever be diagnosed until adulthood, if at all, where some people might be diagnosed in utero, and some may not survive childhood, because of how many problems they end up having because of this, and there's everything in between.

SPEAKER_04

34:22 - 34:41

And so can you give me some sort of example for like the three points along the spectrum that you just described. Yeah, in terms of like what the what the mutation in the collagen is or how that collagen is different or what is that collagen not doing.

SPEAKER_01

34:41 - 36:33

So it really can depend. One of the papers that I read that tried to propose a newer classification system tried to break these down by the types of mutations and like the The biochemistry, I guess, of these mutations. I'll be honest that I don't know how much traction this classification system has gotten because like on the NIH website, for example, it still just says like 19 different types and so. grains of salt and all, but it really can vary. Some of the less severe phenotypes might just be impairments in either the amount of collagen that's produced, so like a null mutation where you're making half of the amount of collagen, but it's normal collagen otherwise, or mutations that impair the ability of a normally formed collagen like monomer to assemble down the line. It's like just the assembly part of it. Other more severe mutations might be from genes that are involved in modifications of collagen, more down the line, like after the collagen is formed. Now, it gets modified in a way that makes it really structurally unsound. Okay. These tend to be less common and are recessively inherited, so they're not horizontal dominant. There are other mutations that could also be more severe that are involved in the way that collagen folds and cross links. Again, like down the line, so like you have a normal Twizzler rope. But when you're trying to link a whole bunch of those Twizzler ropes together, it just doesn't work correctly. So there's a huge variety.

SPEAKER_04

36:34 - 36:47

And in terms of heritability, it's interesting to me that most types seem to be autosomal dominant. But there are a handful that are autosomal recessive.

SPEAKER_02

36:47 - 36:50

Which ones are which? Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

36:50 - 38:18

It's a great question. So it is really interesting. The autosomal dominant types, again, are the ones that we probably knew a lot more about and are historically the ones most considered osteogenesis imperfecta and those type one through fours. Those are the null mutations and those are mutations that can be in the collagen genes themselves. And so they are impairing the assembly of those collagen fibros and those collagen strands. Even within that, there's huge amounts of variation in terms of what the phenotype could be, right? Because again, that was like what we thought of when it was just types one through four, which is anything from relatively mild to perinatal lethal. But then there are so many other recessive types that are more about mutations, not in the collagen genes themselves, but in the modifications of collagen, in the cross-linking of collagen, in the things that happened down the line where you would need to have two of the mutated allele to actually have that phenotype, right? Whereas with the others, if there's a mutation in the collagen gene itself, even if you make some typical collagen, some proportion of your collagen is either abnormal or missing, and therefore you have some symptoms of disease.

SPEAKER_04

38:18 - 38:31

This might be an epidemiology question, okay? But what proportion of cases of osteogenesis and perfect are inherited versus which are spontaneous mutation?

SPEAKER_01

38:32 - 39:29

Oh, that is such a good question. I don't actually know. I didn't really see that number anywhere. And I think part of the reason is that most of the numbers that I have are really just that 85 to 90% of cases are mutations in those two genes that encode for type 1 collagen, COL, 1 A1 and COL, 1 A2, 85 to 90%. of osteogenesis and perfect is that. That is autosomal dominant. The rest are so variable that I don't know. I don't know how many of them are denove on mutations versus genetic within families. It's also so many of them. Many have been found in only one or a handful of patients. And so they're so rare that it's really hard to even know, especially with something that's autosomore recessive.

SPEAKER_04

39:29 - 39:58

Right. Yeah. Okay, so we've talked about like the mutations. We've talked about some of the different structures and disruptions and collagen function or quantity or whatever. And we've talked about some of the end results of that. What does that mean for a lifetime? And also what does that mean for the most severe type that you discussed? Like how? Why is it fatal?

SPEAKER_01

39:58 - 42:14

Yeah. Yeah. So in terms of what does it mean for a lifetime, it can vary hugely. But in terms of when it is either lethal or results in severe disease, some of the most severe manifestations come from its effects on the bones in our torso and on our heart and lungs itself, or themselves. In the cases of these more severe disease manifestations, it's cardiopulmonary issues, heart and lung issues that lead to the most severe morbidity and mortality. So what we can see is recurrent lung infections like pneumonia and eventual heart failure as a result of lung disease, which is called core pulmonal. And this is very often due not to problems in the lungs themselves, but skeletal issues, rib fractures, recurrent rib fractures, severe scoliosis, things that eventually lead to dysfunction or the inability to inspire appropriately and to breathe enough so that then there is damage to the lungs over time because of that. Okay. Or in some very severe cases, it's respiratory failure in that perinatal period because there's not enough structure to be able to keep the lungs open. And because collagen also makes up our vasculature, there can be independent issues that arise with the cardiovascular system, our heart, including aortic root dilation. So the part of your aorta that attaches to the left ventricle of your heart, getting a little bit dilated, which leads to regurgitation or backflow of blood. back into our heart instead of making it out into the rest of our body, which then leads to increased pressure in the heart, which can also lead to heart failure down the line. So those are some of the more severe things that can happen as a result of this collagen issue, both in our vasculature, but also just in the bones that make up our whole body.

SPEAKER_02

42:14 - 42:18

Yeah. Yeah. Treatment?

SPEAKER_01

42:18 - 43:24

Yeah. Across the board, the most important component of treatment is actually physical therapy. So it's a lot about strengthening muscles to protect these bones. The other component of treatment is with medications, and we don't have great options yet. But one really common group of medicines are called biz phosphonates. These are the same medicines that we use to treat osteoporosis. And what they do is help with bone deposition, like mineralization, and they decrease bone turnover. It's not fixing the problem, especially if the problem is the way that the collagen is formed. But the theory is that it helps strengthen the bones, like putting a cast kind of around your noodle rope. Okay. The idea behind this is that it would then prevent fractures. But apparently, if you can't tell by how much I'm hedging, the data is a little bit equivocal so far on whether or not it actually prevents fractures.

SPEAKER_04

43:24 - 43:36

Yeah. Well, and I mean, honestly, like that kind of makes sense, given the huge variation in, right? different, you know, ways that college and can, I don't know, not work.

SPEAKER_02

43:36 - 43:40

That's quite as well. And so it's like, yeah.

SPEAKER_01

43:40 - 44:04

It's so it's just such a huge array of possible symptoms and consequences, resulting from a huge array of mutations. So I won't be surprised if someday all of these various classifications end up being considered different diseases in some respects, quite honestly.

SPEAKER_04

44:04 - 44:23

Yeah, yeah. Erin, I can't not ask just, I know that we should do a whole episode on this someday, but like there are so many products out there with collagen. Do you have like a TLDR that you can give me?

SPEAKER_01

44:24 - 45:00

Oh, the easiest TLDR is that you actually can't absorb collagen through your GI tract. It's too big. So it's only either amino acids that make up collagen or I think it's like hydrolyzed collagen, which is like what you probably take in a powder that's like little teeny tiny bits of collagen in your collagen powder that you might drink. There's like very mixed data on whether or not it does anything. to drink your collagen. Okay. Okay. But I would love to do a whole episode on it. Let's do that.

SPEAKER_02

45:00 - 45:05

Let's do that. And other supplements. There's we could do it again.

SPEAKER_01

45:05 - 45:08

A whole many theories. Yeah. Yeah. Add it to the list.

SPEAKER_04

45:10 - 45:11

Okay, interesting.

SPEAKER_01

45:11 - 45:21

So, speaking of interesting air in, I don't think that I can ask where did this come from, but like, how did we get here when it comes to instances in perspective?

SPEAKER_04

45:21 - 46:48

Yeah. Let's get into it right after this break. I want to start off the history section with a quote. Love that quote. One of the more frustrating endeavors for those interested in the history of medicine can be the desire to discover the first published description of a disease, operation, or procedure. Having attempted this on several occasions, I have concluded that it requires more than a large medical library, a good memory, luck, perseverance, or a high degree of suspicion for quoted sources. I am always left with the uneasy feeling that only the personal perusal of the original publication will convey the author's true thoughts, meaning seem to change in quoted sources, and often contain errors in regard to context, interpretation, translation, and bibliographic data. Osteogenesis imperfecta is a case in point.

SPEAKER_02

46:51 - 46:53

So what you're saying is we don't know.

SPEAKER_04

46:53 - 50:16

Yeah, that was the paragraph to say three words we don't know. So that was from a paper titled osteogenesis imperfecta historical background by Ulrich H. Wheel MD published in 1980. And when I read it, first of all, I was like, this is an amazing quote. Also, I love that this author devoted so much space to this sentiment. It's great. But it's a great quote. I thought to begin the history of osteogenesis in perfecta, and honestly, like many, it's applicable to many other topics that we've covered. because I think it does sort of force us to think about what is important when tracing the history of a disease and why is it important? You know, is it that doctor so-and-so was the first to name something? Maybe especially if you're that doctor so-and-so or related to that doctor so-and-so? Or is it the order that things were discovered about a condition? Or how the timing of discoveries influenced the perception of a disease because of the current social or political climate? Or how the discovery of a condition altered the experience of those who had it? Or how the discovery changed medicine itself? Or maybe it's like combination of all those things and it can be. And don't worry, this is not going to be just a giant philosophical discussion or lecture on how to construct a narrative on the history of medicine. I just thought that this quote kind of served as a good reminder that the stories that we tell are exactly that, their stories. And the storytellers themselves choose what does or doesn't go into a story. And they're human. We're human with biases and flaws and sometimes typos, oftentimes typos. So what does that mean for osteogenesis imperfecta? It means that what I want to focus mostly on today is not who gets priority for the first description of this disorder, but how our understanding of it has grown over time and what that is meant for the people living with this disease, especially as the divide between knowledge and application has shrunk but like not entirely at all. Okay, so let's get started with this history by heading back as we often do to ancient Egypt. Since osteogenesis imperfecta is associated, of course, with skeletal changes, we can make fairly confident diagnoses in skeletal remains that have evidence of the disease. And the earliest of these that I came across is from an ancient Egyptian mummy, an infant, from around 1000 BCE. The infant skull and bones were consistent with osteogenesis imperfecta, specifically types three and four. I think they couldn't distinguish between those two. But from what I can tell, there aren't references to osteogenesis imperfecta in any ancient texts, or at least any that aren't like incredibly vague. And what I thought was kind of interesting.

SPEAKER_01

50:16 - 50:28

That is, because it's Yeah, I mean, bones are often what we look to see about so many other diseases. And so it is interesting. It is, it is.

SPEAKER_04

50:28 - 53:10

And also like what proportion of medical writings from ancient, from the ancient world remains today, what is still waiting to be translated, et cetera. Like, you know, it's, I'm not saying that they don't exist. It's just that A, I didn't read about them. be no one's worried about them yet. I don't know. It could be both. But there is a legendary figure from the 9th century CE that has been said to have osteogenesis imperfecta. Ivar the boneless. Oh, sometimes translated as Ivar. I hope it's Ivar, not Ivar. Ivar the legless. I've our the bonus was a Viking king slash leader slash person of importance who I couldn't get a handle on what position he held. But in any case, he makes an appearance in the 13th century epic poem The Tale of Ragnar Lordbrok. he was the son of Ragnar. And in this poem is the story of how I've our travels to East Anglia and Northumbria, to avenge his father, who was murdered by the King of Northumberland. He was successful, allegedly killing the King Ayala and a horrible way, the blood eagle. Maybe read about it, maybe don't. Ultimately, I've our dies in Dublin, like peacefully, in the year 873. Before he died, he instructed that his body should be buried in a mound on the east coast of England, saying that as long as his grave was undisturbed, no invasion of England would be successful. And that apparently held true until William the conqueror landed there in 1066 and burned Ivar's remains. Just a fun little story. That has nothing to do. That's just mostly backstory on this guy. Ivar. Okay. And because we don't know where I've ar was buried or if he existed at all or was just like a composite figure in this poem. But if he did exist, his body was possibly burned so like we can't make a, you know, a diagnosis based on his remains. We can't know whether or not he had osteogenesis imperfecta. I've our mother was said to be cursed while she was pregnant with him, and he was unable to walk and was carried on a shield into battle where he would use a long bow. So maybe he had, oh, I. But another explanation for his name that some authors suggest was that it was like an insult, suggesting that he wasn't really up to the task.

SPEAKER_02

53:10 - 53:11

That's certain ways.

SPEAKER_01

53:14 - 53:20

But it was just that he couldn't walk. That's the only, yeah.

SPEAKER_02

53:20 - 53:20

Interesting.

SPEAKER_04

53:20 - 53:32

I know. So this is what the amount of conjecture that comes out of some of these early histories of diseases is simply staggering.

SPEAKER_00

53:32 - 53:33

Yeah. Yeah.

SPEAKER_04

53:34 - 55:17

And we're never going to know. But I did want to mention him because his name comes up in like every history of osteogenesis imperfecta, more or less. And there are a few other possible references to what could be osteogenesis imperfecta in like ancient and medieval times, but very much in theme with the quote at the beginning, the original ancient source can't be found or it's been mis translated or whatever. So let's move on to the 17th century. That's where we have to go from here. And that's when the next possible reference to osteogenesis imperfecta shows up in France in 1675, from the philosopher Nicholas Day Malabrasch, who wrote that quote. About seven or eight years ago, a young man could be seen at the In Curables Hospital, who was born mad, and whose body was broken in the same places as murderers' bones are broken. He lived for about 20 years in this condition. Several people saw him, and the late Queen Mother, when paying a visit to this hospital, was curious to see him, and even to touch the arms and legs of that young man where his limbs were broken. End quote. Demalibrash then provided his reasoning for why this man had this condition, quote, the cause of this terrible accident was the fact that the mother having heard that a criminal was to be put on the wheel went to see the execution. All the blows that were given to that wretch struck the imagination of that mother forcefully and as an indirect consequence, the tender and delicate brain of her child. End quote.

SPEAKER_02

55:18 - 55:21

Sorry. What?

SPEAKER_04

55:21 - 55:51

So, yeah, he is... Not even like suggesting, but just like stating very firmly that this guy's mother who when pregnant with him saw this public execution and that every blow that landed on the guy who was on the wheel, the person put to death, then when he was born, he later had breaks and all the, it sounds,

SPEAKER_01

55:53 - 56:00

Not only makes no sense. It also, why does it sound weirdly familiar?

SPEAKER_04

56:00 - 56:19

Oh, I think epilepsy was a lot about when someone was pregnant and they witnessed something, and then I think it was epilepsy. And that sounds about sounds familiar. I mean, to be honest, Aaron, we know that it's going to be 1000 different things, right? Like, yeah. Anything that you can blame a woman for. Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

56:19 - 56:22

Yeah. It's always mom's fault. Yeah.

SPEAKER_04

56:24 - 58:18

Yeah, it doesn't make any sense. The next reference to what is likely osteogenesis imperfecto was written with slightly less conviction about what caused it. Okay, this is from a medical report from France in 1690. On March 8, 1690, a woman in her late 20s was admitted to the hotel due in Paris. She complained that over the past four months, she had suffered extreme and diffuse pain all over the body with no apparent feverish episode. Although she could walk and move without restriction, she suffered unbearable pain when anyone touched her. After three months of forced bed rest, she could no longer walk. All bones fragmented, and it was impossible to touch her without causing new fractures. The pain increased progressively until she died. On dissection, we found that the upper and lower limb bones, clavicles, ribs, vertebrae, and the pelvis were broken, not a single unbroken bone was found. The bones were thin, tender, and full of red marrow. Upon manipulation, they pulverized and dissolved like rotten wet tree bark. We could sink our fingers into her skull bones, the consistency of which was similar to that found in a 15-day-old neonate. Cartilages and articulations showed no sign of alteration. The internal organs were healthy, and no other signs for pathological condition were found. It is known that smallpox can cause bony erosion, but in this case, the bones were melted and softened. What was the cause and nature of their dissolution? End quote. Wow. Yeah. That's a pretty, that's a pretty gnarly description.

SPEAKER_01

58:18 - 58:20

Yeah. Yeah.

SPEAKER_04

58:20 - 58:37

That is if sounds like a very severe form, what struck me about this was the mention of pain, because you didn't really talk about pain very much, but is pain a major feature of some of these different types of osteogenesis imperfecta?

SPEAKER_01

58:38 - 59:13

I mean, certainly, yes, especially because these fractures are painful, like breaking a bone is incredibly painful. So it's not that this disruption in collagen disrupts in any way, all of the nerves and everything else that's involved. So the fractures themselves are going to be painful. The way that bones heal might lead to additional kind of damage on the line like we talked with the scoliosis and things like that, which can be painful. So certainly, pain can be a component of osteogenesis in perfecta.

SPEAKER_04

59:15 - 01:00:02

Um, okay. Well, anyway, so still traveling through these early mentions, there is sometimes people mentioned someone named Armand as providing the next description of OI in 1716 that I didn't really find anymore about that. Like, that was it. Then we have the dissertation of Swedish Surgeon, Olaus Yakub Ekman, published in 1788, which had previously been considered the first scientific description of the disease. Even though he considered them to be cases of osteomalacia that ran in families. So he described four generations living in a mining district with bony disorders resulting in disability. But he just thought that it was osteomalacia. Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

01:00:03 - 01:00:15

Yeah, that is interesting, because Rick gets which we already did this season. And Scurvy are all definitely on the differential that is when it comes to osteogenesis and perfect. Yeah. Yeah.

SPEAKER_04

01:00:16 - 01:02:23

But are you seeing how the quote at the beginning is like so relevant? Yeah. And then there's this. And then like there are so many different instances of the first description of this and that. Anyway, personally, what I think is that the first description that really matters is the one from Edmund Axeman in 1831, where he describes for the first time the four major characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta. bone fragility, joint hypermobility with easy dislocation, blue sclera, and a frail body. A couple of years later, Lobstein described a condition he called osteosathorosis idiopathica, an abnormal brittleness of bones, particularly afflicting children and the elderly, also mentioning that it can run in families. It's unclear whether he was actually talking about like a combination of osteoporosis and rickets, or actually OI, And so at this point, we have, okay, we don't have a complete clinical clear picture, but we have now gotten like a distinct condition. So this is not just like a symptom that people are talking about. This is a collection of symptoms. There are recognizable features, and that makes diagnosis a possibility by around like the first half of the 19th century. But like a diagnosis of what? Because what we now know as osteogenesis imperfecta didn't yet have that name, right? So how did that happen? Gerardus Vrolick was a professor of anatomy and physiology and of theoretical and clinical obstetrics at the University of Amsterdam in the early 19th century. Sorry, what is theoretical of stutters? It's just imagining how everything happens. Okay. Cool. Yeah. Okay. Malpractice Insurance is very low. That's my dorkiest joke yet.

SPEAKER_02

01:02:23 - 01:02:27

I really liked it. Thank you.

SPEAKER_04

01:02:27 - 01:06:31

As if anyone needed Malpractice Insurance in the 19th century. One of Rolex's special interests was congenital disorders. And that was a topic that was very popular at the time. I saw it described in one paper as the golden era of descriptive tarotology. Anyway, Vrolick, in addition to publishing case studies of some of the congenital disorders that he treated or came across, he also began a private collection of specimens. Humans and other animals. That sounds. Mm-hmm. Oh, I shouldn't have. Yeah. I think it still exists. His son Willem, who was also a physician with an interest in congenital disorders, inherited this collection after his father's death, and studied it. One of the samples that he came across and found were the of description was the skeleton of an infant that had died three days after birth. with numerous fractures. William dissected the skeleton and found that there were fractures in every intact bone. The skull, large and with a high forehead, was fractured. The ribs were very thin and development overall seemed incomplete. In 1849, he published his description and his belief that the infant had a condition he termed osteogenesis imperfecta. stating that he believed, unlike most of his contemporaries, that it was a condition that the infant had been born with, rather than something they had acquired after birth, as in like Ricketts. Later re-examination of the skeleton in the 1990s led to the diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfective type 2. Over the second half of the 1800s and into the early 1900s, more observations trickled in, some that seemed to be more or less a repetition of what had already been published, and others that added a bit more detail to the overall clinical picture, like Spurway in 1896, reporting on how bluish-sclara sometimes happened in association with brittle bones, which was then repeated and elaborated on by Edo's in 1900, who hypothesized that, quote, the transparency of the squareotics indicates a want of the quality or quantity of the fibrous tissue forming the network of the various organs of the body, and probably explains the want of spring or toughness in the bones of these particular individuals. and quote, great, great job, right? I'll honestly pretty impressive, solid. Yeah. Other researchers noted that Karatakonus, like where the cornea gets thinner and kind of bulges out in the center, like a cone, also sometimes occurred with bone fragility, with at least one researcher noting the hereditary nature of the condition. Hereditary hearing loss associated with brittle bones and blue sclera was described for possibly the first time in 1912 in a paper titled four generations of blue sclerotics by British ophthalmologist and ENT Charles Allen Adair Diten. And this observation was repeated by others shortly after. And so like this is just I feel like a list, a bunch of people who described a bunch of different things. And I feel like doing this episode right after Parkinson's made me realize how comparatively rare or at the very least different the history of Parkinson's was. Where there seemed to be like one landmark paper picked up by one landmark scientist and then everything grew from there. Yeah. For osteogenesis imperfecta, it has seemed like centuries of incremental progress and repetition. You know, like dozens of people coming in and putting one piece of this thousand piece puzzle together time after time after time.

SPEAKER_01

01:06:31 - 01:06:42

Yeah. I mean, I wonder if that reflects not only how variable osteogenesis and perfect it can be, but also how much more rare it is comparatively.

SPEAKER_02

01:06:42 - 01:06:43

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_04

01:06:43 - 01:10:27

And also like the way the story is told, right? Like maybe I could have been like, and then in 1896, we had this example of whatever, you know? And then everything came from there. But I think, I think this is a good representation of how most science does actually happen. Right. Where it's not like, it certainly can happen the way that Parkinson's, the history of Parkinson's did. Right. Here's this one thing. Whoa, that opened up this door to tons and tons of research. A lot of the time, it is this incremental progress. It is the slight, you know, shedding a light and the light gets brighter and brighter and brighter and hits a wider and wider area. And sometimes the light doesn't change. But yeah, it's just, I don't know. I thought that was interesting. Okay, anyway, with osteogenesis imperfecta, we've made it into the 20th century, and we have a general clinical description of this disorder. We have a typing system, not the one we used today, not even the one that we used that you mentioned that was historical. We had one that was like, here's osteogenesis imperfecta inherited and here's where it is acquired, like it doesn't really track. But that system was based on severity and the age of presentation. We also had a growing recognition that many body systems were involved in the condition, like not just bones, not just bones and eyes. There were many, many, many different organ systems and body systems involved. And we had some diagnostic criteria. But what we didn't have by the first half of the 20th century is any real framework around why? Why are the bones prone to fracture? Why are the scleroblue? Like what is happening physiologically to cause this condition? There was a general notion that it was a congenital connective tissue disorder. A hypothesis supported by observations of dental, cartilage, skin, and blood vessel involvement in addition to the familiar bone and eye and ear involvement. But what was happening at the cellular level in all of the various types of osteogenesis imperfecta, how was still a mystery up into the 1970s? Wow, right? It was then that research on collagen had taken incredible steps forward and also during the 1960s because even though collagen itself had been recognized since the 1930s, I believe the technology and background knowledge needed to uncover the incredible importance and innumerable functions of this protein, like how it synthesized its assembly and structure, not to mention the many types of collagen. All of that background information and technology wasn't there until the 1960s and 70s. But once these pieces came together, once collagen types one through four and all the major steps in biosynthesis had been identified, then finally people could start to get some clarity, not only on how collagen worked, but what happened when it didn't work. Right. And just like what you said, Aaron, because collagen is so abundant in our bodies, literally the most abundant protein. And because it functions in so many different ways, it can go wrong in just an unbelievable number of ways.

SPEAKER_01

01:10:27 - 01:10:38

There are so many other diseases and disorders that we could cover that also have to do with collagen. I was like deep diving on our earlier's Danlos while I was researching for this.

SPEAKER_04

01:10:38 - 01:15:01

So like yeah, got to do that someday. We've gotten a lot of requests for sure. And as this research on collagen was happening, as this literal opening up of the field of collagen, scientists were also busy tracking inheritance patterns in osteogenesis imperfecta, observing that both these autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive types were present, and also some of the ways that collagen could go wrong and become involved in these different types of osteogenesis imperfecta. And so out of this, out of this kind of just whirlwind couple of decades of research, there was a great progress in genetic research in understanding the precise nature of those changes in collagen. And that has led to a greater understanding overall of the disorder, as well as, like you said, Aaron hopes for treatment in the form of gene therapy. But like we talked about in our Parkinson's disease episode, all of that new information, while hugely important, doesn't necessarily translate into current application. With the introduction of physiotherapy, rehabilitation, and improvements in orthopedic surgery, We had come a long way in preventing and treating fractures in people with osteogenesis imperfecta since those earliest descriptions. But until 1987, there was still no medication that could help with bone density loss or pain, despite dozens of attempts. That year, a case study was published that described a 12-year-old girl who was diagnosed with osteogenesis imperfecta after a spontaneous hip fracture. Her physician's prescribed bisphosphine, or a type of bisphosphine drug, that had been used previously with some success in people with juvenile osteoporosis and other types of conditions where bone mass loss was a feature. Until this case, no one had apparently tried this drug on osteogenesis imperfecta. And over the course of a year, X-rays and blood analysis showed increased bone mass, which was amazing. After years of no effect, no effect, no effect. Finally, there was a drug that showed some promise. a bunch of studies followed and it seems like it does actually help with at the very least improving bone mass if not necessarily pain or fracture risk or overall bone growth. But that alone is fantastic because it's really not been anything before then. And Erin, I know you're about to tell me some more about like gene therapy and hopefully other potential medications. I only made it to the 1990s with my research. But I think that one thing that's really crucial to talk about that kept coming up in some of these papers, although not enough, is not just the potential health benefits of these medications, but also how they can improve quality of life. fear of fractures, anxiety about going outside or being active, caution when it comes to everyday life and activity, isolation or feelings of being different. These are all commonly reported themes in studies that try to examine the lived experience of people, both children and adults with osteogenesis imperfecta. And of course, not every experience is the same. But I think that it's important to talk about and recognize the non-physical effects that osteogenesis imperfecta might have on someone. And certainly things like OI groups and awareness campaigns have been fantastic for building community and providing resources to people with osteogenesis imperfecta as well as their caregivers. But there's still a long way to go when it comes to treatment and access to their treatments. because we know it's got to be expensive, just has to be. So Erin, here's where I turn it over to you to tell me what those up-and-coming probably expensive treatments are and you know everything else about where we stand with osteogenesis imperfecta today.

SPEAKER_01

01:15:01 - 01:19:25

I can't wait to try right after this break. So one of the first papers that I read for researching this episode described osteogenesis imperfecta as a quote, fairly common rare disorder, which, oxymoron, I don't know what that means. But the stat that was quoted in that paper as well as pretty much every paper that had statistics was that osteogenesis in perfect is found in one in 15 to 20,000 births every year. Okay. So if we air in math this, would you know I'm going to? According to Google, there are 140 million births every year. And the CDC says that in the US, there are over just a little over 3.6 million births every year in the US. So if we assume on the low end, one in 15,000 people are born with osteogenesis. In perfecta, that would be worldwide just over 9,000 people born with OI every year and 240 in the US each year. Okay. Now, since these are birth statistics, they are very likely underestimates because these are going to reflect relatively more severe forms of osteogenesis and perfecta because there are always going to be people that don't end up getting diagnosed until later in their life because of less severe phenotypes or just not being diagnosed in infancy for one reason or another. A couple of papers that I read cited an estimated prevalence of 25 to 50,000 people in the United States living with OI. But it was very disappointingly difficult to get any additional data on prevalence worldwide. surprises me. I know. And these are a whole variety of genetic disorders, but I couldn't find almost anything in terms of the estimates on like what is the variability geographically across the globe because of course there's going to be some. And there does seem to be some variability but there were so little data and the data that I found was like reported quite differently in the few countries that it was reported in like this many cases per 100,000 versus per 10,000 births in this country. So like it was really hard to make any meaningful comparisons in other countries aside from the US. So I apologize. I just couldn't find it, but in any case, this is certainly a rare disorder, but as always, the more that we think about it and look for it and research it, the more that we find. So in terms of where we stand with current research, again here, I found less than I was hoping for, but not nothing. There is one new drug very new drug making headlines big time that's in phase two and three clinical trials right now. This drug is a monoclonal antibody that specifically, this is really interesting to me. It inhibits a small protein called sclerostin, which is a protein that is involved in the remodeling of bone. So the idea behind this is that by inhibiting the action of this protein, you end up having increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption that could lead to stronger bones and less fractures and increased quality of life.

SPEAKER_04

01:19:26 - 01:19:37

Can I ask a question about bone remodeling? Sure. Why? But I feel like we talked about this in rickets, but I don't remember.

SPEAKER_01

01:19:37 - 01:20:20

Yeah. Yes, so your bones are almost constantly, like your body is reserving bone and then remodeling bone. And this process also happens a lot during the growth process. Like growth of bone is not just like this one off, like your bone grows process. There's like The college and parts of bone have to grow. The mineralization deposit has to happen. It's a whole process. This would be a fun whole episode, honestly, to do about bone, osteoplasts and osteoclasts. But in any case, it's a process that happens over time. Your bones are dynamic.

SPEAKER_04

01:20:21 - 01:20:33

Is that, yeah, no, I mean, that answers my question, but I guess my follow-up question then is, is there a potential downside then to inhibiting the bone remodeling?

SPEAKER_01

01:20:36 - 01:21:48

I'm sure potentially. Potentially, yes. I don't know any more details about it. I just know that the idea behind this is that if in the case that you have bones that are already more fragile, you want just an increase in bone formation, kind of in the same way that bisphosphonates are leading to more mineral deposition and less of the remodeling, if that makes sense. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The good thing about this particular treatment is that it is not mutation specific. This has the potential to help regardless of most of the underlying causes or mutations involved in osteogenesis in perfecta. It's still very much in clinical trials. I have no idea. Time will tell if it's effective or not. And I really expected to find a lot more because this is a genetic disorder, because many of the cases are autosomal dominant disorders, and we know the genes that are involved, a lot more information on where we stand with gene therapy, but I really didn't find much.

SPEAKER_04

01:21:49 - 01:22:05

And you know what else just occurred to me is that it seems like the very few treatments we have so far are mostly targeting bone, not any of the other organs or tissues affected by osteogenesis imperfecta.

SPEAKER_01

01:22:05 - 01:22:13

Yes, definitely, definitely. That's the vast majority of all treatments, prior and current effect.

SPEAKER_02

01:22:13 - 01:22:14

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

01:22:14 - 01:23:20

Yeah. The osteogenesis imperfective foundation has some information on other trials that are ongoing. And there are a number of other additional targets that are being looked at in terms of other ways to try and treat mostly, like you said Aaron, the bone components of osteogenesis imperfecta. There are also studies being done, importantly by Baylor College of Medicine, to look at mental health and quality of life overall in people living with osteogenesis imperfecta, which is always an overlooked part of any chronic disorder story, quite honestly. Yeah. And a really important one at that. That's what I have so far. It's not as much as I would have liked. Please let me know listeners if I missed something major because I'd like to know if there's more out there. But if you'd like to learn more, who have we got sources for you?

SPEAKER_02

01:23:20 - 01:23:22

Oh, he certainly do.

SPEAKER_04

01:23:22 - 01:23:50

I've got, uh, I have more than a handful, but I'm only going to shout out to right now. One is by wheel from 1980, osteogenesis imperfecta historical background. And then I read a book chapter from 2014 by silence and Lamont titled evolution of the present understanding of the clinical and genetic heterogeneity and molecular and biochemical basis of osteogenesis imperfecta.

SPEAKER_02

01:23:50 - 01:23:52

Oh, it's a mouthful.

SPEAKER_01

01:23:52 - 01:24:33

I have a number of papers. Some of my favorites were three different papers just titled osteogenesis and perfect. I've got to love the simplicity of it. Two that were from the Lancet, one that was from major reviewed disease primers, always a favorite. There are a whole bunch more a paper about collagen if you want a deep dive on that. And papers about the current understanding, the different classifications. And of course, investigations into treatments. You can find the list of sources from this episode and every single one of our episodes on our website, this podcast will kill you.com under the episodes tab.

SPEAKER_04

01:24:33 - 01:24:44

Thank you Natalie again so so much for sharing your story with us like we just Cannot express how much we appreciate you doing that.

SPEAKER_01

01:24:44 - 01:24:52

Yeah, thank you so much. Thank you also to Blood Mobile for providing the music for this episode and all of our episodes.

SPEAKER_04

01:24:52 - 01:24:57

And thank you to Tom Brifoble for the audio mixing we love it.

SPEAKER_02

01:24:57 - 01:25:07

We do. Thank you exactly right network. And thank you to you listeners. I hope you liked it. How do you feel about collagen? Collagen. If you want to hold episode on it, let us know.

SPEAKER_01

01:25:07 - 01:25:15

Yeah. And as always, a special thank you to our patrons, thank you so much for your support.

SPEAKER_02

01:25:15 - 01:25:16

It means everything. It truly does.

SPEAKER_04

01:25:16 - 01:25:22

Okay, well, until next time, wash your hands. You've built the animals.