Transcript for Ep 134 Tonsils: Underestimated and underappreciated
SPEAKER_04
00:01 - 00:06
This is exactly right.
SPEAKER_00
00:06 - 00:42
On the 12th season of 10 fold more wicked, we investigate a series of compelling mysteries from the city of Fall River Massachusetts, where problems started generations before Lizzie Borden's murders made her a household name. Join me as we cover the misfortunes that have befallen this infamous town from more than 150 years, including the great fire of 1843. Season 12 premieres Monday, May 13th on exactly right. Follow 10 fold more wicked on Apple podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
SPEAKER_03
00:42 - 06:09
Hello. My name is Erin, and I'm here to talk about my ton select in the experience. So this happened when I was 35 years old. It started, I guess, in my early 30s, I was getting pretty consistently, I would say two to three times a year, some sort of tonsill infection, where I would have to be on a two or three week course of antibiotics to clear it up, and this was really doing a number on, well, my gut health for one, and just my health in general. This was kind of taking place right after COVID had started, and with these infections came a lot of fevers and just being run down and ill. which kind of resulted in me missing a lot of work because we weren't 100% sure if it was COVID or not, it never was. But I just had to keep going in for these infections over and over. And finally my doctor said, this is too many antibiotics. Have you considered having your tonsils take it out? Because this is probably just going to keep happening. I thought about it, and my coworker, her son, who I don't remember how old he was. Maybe eight or nine, had just had his tonsils out, and he was fine. Two days later, he was back at school. So I thought, well, this can't be that bad. Kids do it all the time. And I asked my doctor, you know, how long would I be out of work? And he said probably two to three days. So I put in for two to three days, and scheduled the procedure. So I went in, everything I guess went really well. My husband was there when I woke up. I don't really remember this, but I guess when I woke up, I was trying to yell. So they actually had to come in and reset date me because I was coughing so much. So I spent an extra few hours in the recovery room waking up and the doctor came in, you know, and he told my husband, everything went fine, gave him the prescriptions and said unprompted. He said, she'll be back to eating hard tacos in a few days. which was kind of, you know, I wasn't awake for it. I don't remember. And so we went home and, you know, as the medications kind of wore off, my husband went and picked up a, they gave me a coding elixir. And I vividly remember for the next night and the night after that, sitting kind of propped up in bed. siking myself up for half an hour to swallow my own spit because it hurt so badly. I this is gross. I kind of decided it wasn't worth it. Some point and just started spitting it out. Um, and this, as you can imagine, kind of created a problem for one staying hydrated and to actually getting my pain medication down, even though it was, you know, a syrup. I just, even just as well as the water was pretty agonizing. So after a couple of days of this, I was very, very rundown. Um, and I had started coughing up this awful brown gunk. And so I don't remember it was maybe around midnight. My husband ended up taking me to the emergency room. And I guess when I got there they said the gun was to be expected, which I was not warned about. But I was also severely dehydrated. So they had to give me a couple bags of fluid. And they said that coding is not going to cut it. And I think they gave me hydrocodone. which was also a problem because those are huge pills. So for the next couple of weeks, I did not go back to work because I couldn't really drink anything. I couldn't eat anything except gelo and eventually putting just a couple of bites every day. I was kind of getting by on pdf lights, just filled terrible. It was obviously don't know what this feels like, but it kind of felt like swallowing razor blades. And so, you know, eventually it did get better, but I think when I looked back, even though you're four months later, I still was pretty sore. You know, this is, you know, I don't want to say don't get a tons of luck to me. If you need one, you definitely should, but you know, I wish my doctor had been a lot more upfront with me about how terrible it was going to be. But on the plus side, I obviously haven't had a tonsil infection since because I don't have tonsils anymore. And I actually just had my first sore throat since the procedure a couple months ago, which is kind of exciting. I'm not on antibiotics all the time anymore, which is great. And one of the things that kind of stuck with me, I talked to my grandmother who had been a nurse for decades. After I was done with a procedure about what had happened, and she said, I didn't want to tell you before you had this done, but the only thing I've heard it compared to pain-wise is like an adult circumcision, and I kind of thought why was she a told me. To be better prepared, and also, I ended up going into nursing afterwards, and I would tell nurses, you know, I had this tonsillectomy in my 30s, and they would just get this look. What would you do that? So, yeah, all that to say is I wish they had been more upfront about how terrible it was, but I am also glad that I did it.
SPEAKER_01
06:56 - 07:10
Aaron, great name. Great name. Great story. Great story. Great story. For a horrible story. I had no idea how bad adult puzzle activities could be.
SPEAKER_04
07:10 - 07:16
It sounds just awful, awful, awful. I'm so sorry.
SPEAKER_01
07:16 - 07:31
Yeah, but also thank you for sharing your story. Thank you so much. Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh. And I'm Aaron Almanabdeck. And this is this podcast with Kill You. Today we're talking all about tonsils. I mean, kind of an off the wall topic. I love it.
SPEAKER_04
07:31 - 07:35
Off the Furnged y'all wall. Oh, it's on my gosh.
SPEAKER_01
07:36 - 07:47
I don't know why. It might have been prompted. I can't remember if I got a tonsil stone before or after I suggested this. I think it was after, which is I conjured it. Are you really dead?
SPEAKER_04
07:47 - 08:02
I used suggested tonsils and I was like, what? And then immediately it was like, yeah, let's do it. I have no idea how this is going to go or what we're going to talk about, but like, why not?
SPEAKER_01
08:02 - 08:10
Toxels. I mean, I feel like tonsils occupy this weird space in like cultural history.
SPEAKER_04
08:10 - 08:13
Oh, I thought you were going to say like in your oral fairings. Oh, that was true.
SPEAKER_01
08:13 - 08:27
I think that's true. It's gonna be all episode. I remember as a kid wanting to have my tonsils taken out so that I could miss school and eat ice cream. That's what I thought it was.
SPEAKER_04
08:27 - 08:49
Oh my God. Okay, so when I told my parents that we were gonna be doing tonsils, it's been hilarious to tell people that we're doing this episode. My mom was like, oh, I still have mine, but a lot of people don't. A lot of people my age and then she turns to my dad and she goes, do you still have your tonsils and he goes, yeah, I got mine. But everyone wanted to get theirs out. And I was like, what? And he goes, Well, you got ice cream.
SPEAKER_01
08:49 - 09:07
Where did this? Where did this notion? It dug in so deeply. I distinctly remember, and I don't even know if I knew anyone growing up. John, my fiance, has his tonsils gone. And I think also tonsils.
SPEAKER_04
09:09 - 09:12
In Madeline, was it her tonsils or her appendix? I don't know.
SPEAKER_01
09:12 - 09:45
I mean, I do know because the history section will reveal all. which doesn't usually happen as maybe it doesn't reveal all. But I do feel like it answered a lot of my own personal questions about like why were tons of lectemies? Why do we know them by name? Why did everyone seem to have tons of lectemies in like? most of the 20th century. Ooh, I can't wait to hear all about it.
SPEAKER_04
09:45 - 09:48
But first, but first, it's quarantine time.
SPEAKER_01
09:48 - 09:52
It certainly is. That goodness. What are we drinking this week?
SPEAKER_04
09:52 - 09:56
In the spirit of tons of like dummies, we're drinking the cut throat.
SPEAKER_01
09:56 - 10:04
not just a trout, but also a delicious cocktail recipe. What is what is in the cut throat?
SPEAKER_04
10:04 - 10:20
It is a multi chocolate milk beverage that will make sense later. I promise. Multid milk powder and vanilla ice cream, chocolate sauce, some whiskey in there. Oh, it's just fantastic.
SPEAKER_01
10:20 - 10:37
It honestly, so perfect. I had to have the ice cream in there too. Like, of course. But we will post the full recipe for the cutthroat quarantine and the non alcoholic placebo rida on our website, this podcast will kill you.com and all of our social media channels.
SPEAKER_04
10:38 - 11:46
Our website, this podcast, okay, you.com. It's a pretty incredible website. If you haven't been there yet, check it out. We've got transcripts from all of our episodes. We've got sources from this episode and every one of our episodes. We've got links to blood mobile for music. We've got our good reads account, our, um, oh, I'm flailing here. We've got Patreon. We've got us there. Check it out. You're good. You're good. We got it. Okay, are we ready for the biology? Let's do it right out of this break. Okay. tonsils. Tonsils. I now I wish that I had written something really like clever to start this off with, but I didn't.
SPEAKER_01
11:46 - 11:49
I mean, tonsils don't rhyme with like anything.
SPEAKER_04
11:49 - 11:53
I know, you don't mean that screenshot of all the things they 92% rhyme with.
SPEAKER_01
11:53 - 11:57
Right. It's terrible. Console is the closest.
SPEAKER_04
11:57 - 12:12
It's not even good. So first of all, what most of us think of when we think of our tonsils are in fact only one of four different tonsils in our buds.
SPEAKER_01
12:13 - 12:22
Yeah, that was like one of the first things I learned and I was felt like I'd been lied to my whole life. But really, I just didn't seek the knowledge.
SPEAKER_04
12:22 - 13:50
So the set of two tonsils, it's a paired set of tonsils that sit at the back of our throat, the ones that get swollen when we get strep throat or any other infection, those are called our palatine tonsils. But we have three more. We have tonsils at the very base of our tongue, like where our tongue connects back in the base, that are appropriately named our lingual tonsils. We have a set that's like in the wall of our nasal pharynx way back up near the opening to our use station tubes. That's our ear tubes. And those are called our tubal tonsils. They're little. And then we have another one that sits at the top rear of our pallet in our nasopharynx, like above and behind our soft pallet, right in the midline, where our nose kind of connects to the back of our throat. And this particular tonsil, which is called our pharyngeal tonsil, is also called our adenoid. Ah, okay. So when you hear adenoids and tonsils, those are the same things they're just talking about two different sets of tonsils. Yeah. And everyone always says adenoids, but it's just one. Like it's one structure. It's not a paired set. It's a one. I mean, it's like JC pennies or Myers or sorry, you say JC pennies, plural?
SPEAKER_01
13:50 - 13:57
I have heard people say that. I do say Myers. What is Myers? Remember, Myers, the grocery store chain? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
SPEAKER_04
13:57 - 14:38
I forgot about that. Yeah. Showing our Midwest. Anyways, anyways. Our adenoids and our tonsils. meaning our forageal tonsil and our palletine tonsils are the two that we all think of the most when we think of our tonsils because these are the ones that get big and swollen and oftentimes painful when we get an infection. So these are the two that will focus on kind of, but really when I'm talking about tonsils, it means all of these different things. So what are these things anyway? Like what the heck are tonsils?
SPEAKER_01
14:38 - 14:42
And what do they have in common with one another?
SPEAKER_04
14:42 - 15:30
Well, let me tell you, all of these tonsils are a type of tissue that are called mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue or malt. Oh yeah, okay. All of these tonsils together form a ring at the back of our throat, which is essentially at the opening of both our digestive and our respiratory systems, right? And this ring is sometimes called wall diers ring. Oh, I named after a guy. I don't know. I'm sure. But the function of all of these tissues, all of this ring of tonsular tissue, essentially, is in short to protect us against infection. the end. Our tonsils are part of our immune system.
SPEAKER_01
15:30 - 15:37
But it's like the type of tissue. So that type of tissue is like only found in these tonsils?
SPEAKER_04
15:37 - 16:46
Oh, great question. No. Our tonsils are by no mean the only forms of malt, mucosyl associated lymphoid tissue that exist. In fact, they are a small part of a large network of malt throughout our bodies. Basically, all of malt are these immune-related tissues that exist specifically on our mucosal surfaces. In our guts, we often call this galt gut associated lymphoid tissue. So we've gut tonsils? Yeah, pretty much. They're called pires patches. In our guts, we also have like isolated lymphoid follicles that just kind of scatter throughout our guts. And we have wait for it, an appendix. Uh-huh. Of course. Also lymphoid tissue. There's also bronchial malt, which is sometimes called bald. Although, not all humans have this. I don't know. It's probably really interesting. I didn't get into it. What? Rodents don't have tonsils, but they do have not, which is nasopharyngeal associated lymphoid tissue.
SPEAKER_01
16:46 - 17:08
This is why spoilers I didn't get into the evolutionary history of tonsils is because I got really overwhelmed by not and malt and disseminated malt and like organized or something malt and not. Yeah. And I was just like, I, too much. Very cool. Yeah. This is over my head. And I'm going to focus on other things.
SPEAKER_04
17:08 - 17:35
Well, let me bring it under your head again, because is that appropriate? Sure. I love it. So the question that we want to understand is like these globs of tissue that are associated with our immune system. Like, what does that actually mean? Like, what does it even mean to be a part of our immune system? What are they doing? What are they composed of? If we remember way, way, way back to our vaccines episode.
SPEAKER_02
17:36 - 17:38
No, season two. I know. Okay.
SPEAKER_04
17:38 - 19:44
20 major throwback. In that episode, we talked about the very specifics of the ways that our immune system responds to antigens, basically responds to the stuff viruses bacteria dust proteins, the crud that we're exposed to all the time. And I won't make you go back and listen to that, but if anyone wants to, it's a great episode. But I'll summarize what we talked about really briefly so that we can understand tonsils. In that episode, I split the immune system into a four-act play focusing specifically on our adaptive immune system. The summary is basically that our bodies mostly via things like our nose and our mouth, but also our guts and our skin and our eyes are constantly exposed to hundreds of thousands of stuff. every day. And we call this stuff anagines. And our immune systems job is to identify all of this stuff and decide what belongs and what doesn't, what's a part of us and what is not supposed to be there and how to deal with it. And one of the major ways that we do this is that we have cells in our body called macrophages. These cells go along in either our bloodstream or our lymphatics. And they gobble up this crud, these antigens, wherever they're exposed to them, and bring them to our T cells, who then bring that crud to our lymph nodes, which we also touched on in our lymphatic polarized episode. And lymph nodes are where our B cells hang out, and our B cells are what make antibodies. Right. That will then be very specific to be able to find, neutralize, and destroy the crud, the antigens. It turns out that that part is accurate, but leaves out part of the story of our immune system, and that story is malt.
SPEAKER_01
19:44 - 19:47
So malt. Sounds like you're talking about a person.
SPEAKER_04
19:47 - 20:12
I just makes me think of malted milk. I mean, appropriate. Okay, so malt. The composition of malt tissue is very similar to our lymph nodes themselves. Except that it is not connected to our lymphatic system.
SPEAKER_01
20:12 - 20:15
That is so bizarre and cool.
SPEAKER_04
20:17 - 20:45
It gets cooler because the stuff that malt is sampling, the stuff that it's going to decide whether or not for our B cells to mount a response to, is being sampled directly from the mucosa itself, rather than going through macrophages traveling through the lymphatics and then making its way to the lymph nodes. So it's like first line. Exactly. It is first line. That is what malt is. It is first line immune system.
SPEAKER_01
20:46 - 20:54
Okay, now I kind of wish I had read more about the evolutionary history because I wonder how basil that is compared to like other parts of our immune system.
SPEAKER_04
20:54 - 22:57
Anyway, it would be really interesting. Histologically, malt is very similar to lymph nodes, except that it doesn't tend to have a capsule. and again, they don't have any lymphatic drainage. But the outer cells of malt tissue, including our tonsils, have these cells called M cells, which are depending on the source called membrane cells or microfold cells. But these are cells that are essentially just really good at uptaking the stuff that our mucosa or nose or mouth are guts are constantly exposed to floating across our mucosa. These M cells take them up and then shuttle them into the core of these tonsils, or other maltissue, but we'll focus on tonsils for this episode. Our tonsils have these crypts, these like deep crypts. And so these structures are covered with this epithelial tissue, and then these M cells just like, swoop stuff into the inner bits, where are housed, B cells, and T cells? And these B and T cells do exactly what they do everywhere else in our body. They sample antigens, and then they make antibodies. And it gets even cooler, because I can see your face being like, what is this? Yeah, absolutely. Our multitudes, especially our tonsils and our pires patches in our gut. They make and secrete a kind of specialized type of antibody called IGA, which is different than other antibodies like IGM and IGG. And it's probably beyond the scope of this episode to get into the nitty gritty on all these different types of antibodies. But IGA is a really important type of antibody that really does function as a first line defense. on these new coastal surfaces. And it's being secreted from things like our tonsils and adenoids and in our guts and things like that.
SPEAKER_01
22:57 - 23:15
This, okay, I don't even know where to begin. I'm fascinated. I don't even know if I have a question at the end of this. I mostly just want to say how, yes, we should definitely do an episode on all the IGs. How I can. And secondly, it's just beautiful.
SPEAKER_04
23:16 - 23:19
It really is. It really is. Wow.
SPEAKER_01
23:19 - 23:24
Okay. Now. And so what's the purpose of the crypts?
SPEAKER_04
23:24 - 24:27
They essentially are what are like funneling and shuddling things in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, And our tonsils, especially our Palatine tonsils, and our Adinoid or Fringeal tonsils, and the other ones as well, they are especially important in this role because they form this ring around the entrance to two of our most important systems that interact with the outside world, our digestive system, and our respiratory system. So our tonsils are being constantly exposed to everything all the time. So that's what they do, that's what they're for. They are a hugely important part of the development of our antibody mediated immune response, especially for things like respiratory viruses and bacteria.
SPEAKER_01
24:27 - 24:30
You may have already said this, but which tonsils are the biggest?
SPEAKER_04
24:31 - 25:15
Great question. The ones that you think of as tonsils, your palatine tonsils, the two that sit in the back of your throat, are the biggest, like physically, they're the big hunkers that you see. The tubular tonsils near you, station tubes, are really quite small. You're at an oide up in your nasal pharynx can get large and we'll talk about it. But it is just a single tonsil and is a little smaller than the others. And then your lingo tonsils back in the back of your tongue are actually a whole series of a bunch of really little things. Okay. like little little cell areas and nuggets. Okay. I'm doing things at my hand. Like patchy.
SPEAKER_01
25:15 - 25:17
You can't see. Yeah. Yeah.
SPEAKER_04
25:17 - 25:18
Patchy panties. Patchy vets.
SPEAKER_01
25:18 - 25:37
Okay. is now the time to say, well, what the heck, if they're so like they seem pretty dang cool and important, how can we take them out with seemingly few negative consequences? Are there negative consequences? Why did they get so bad that they have to be taken out all of that? I know.
SPEAKER_04
25:37 - 25:58
Yeah, there's a lot of stuff. There was a lot where I was like, I don't know where to go from here. Like, that's what a console is. Like, now what? So let's start with Where can things go wrong? If these are something that is so great, then why don't we talk about when things are less great? I eat tonsillitis. Shall we?
SPEAKER_01
25:58 - 25:59
Yeah.
SPEAKER_04
25:59 - 27:42
So tonsillitis literally just means inflammation,itis in your tonsils. And again, at this point, when I'm talking about tonsils, I am primarily now only talking about the two big ones, the fringial tonsil that is your adinoids, and primarily the palatine tonsils that are commonly referred to as tonsils, right? So tonsilitis turns out it's not actually like a very specific thing because sore throat in general is really common. It's one of the most common symptoms. It's associated with so many viral infections. The flu, the common cold, covid, mono, so many bacterial infections, strep throat, many more. Not all sore throats will necessarily cause inflammation in the tonsils themselves. And sometimes a sore throat is just called like acute pharyngitis, which just means sore throat in medical terms, inflammation in the pharynx or whatever. But often there is some degree of tonsillitis, especially depending on the age of the person and the infectious agent, that happens when there is sore throat. There's a few different reasons why our palletine tonsils, the two in the back of your throat, are so very prone to this. Partly, it's because like I already said, they are constantly being exposed to and sampling all of the viruses and bacteria that we're exposed to and that just like live and hang out in our throats.
SPEAKER_01
27:42 - 27:51
There's like walking around a Costco trying every single sample. I'm not blocking the entrance to the aisles.
SPEAKER_04
27:51 - 28:01
Yes, that's what it is. That's what happens. The crypts just get trapped sometimes. Stuff gets stuck in the aisles of Costco in our tonsils.
SPEAKER_01
28:01 - 28:05
I don't know if this metaphor is like, I love it. I love it.
SPEAKER_04
28:07 - 30:16
But then they can begin to proliferate before we've managed to mount a sufficient immune response, right? And that's going to cause some degree of blood flow inflammation to the area. Pain receptors, cytokines are going to be sent out, which are going to tell us that there's pain. There's also, I have a really interesting paper on like the actual pathophysiology of the pain of a sore throat that's like really fascinating and interesting. Um, but there's like a lot of open nerve endings that exist in that region, which is part of it. It's like, why? It's so painful. It's so painful, I know. But anyways, on top of that, a lot of the respiratory pathogens that cause sore throat, especially like all of the millions of rhinovirus serivars are really well adapted to the cells of our tonsils. So they are actually really good at not just being sampled by, but getting into and replicating within the cells of our consoles. So our tonsils cells, while there's like this trade-off, right? They're really good at sampling all of this material, but they're also really prone to infection because they sit at some of the most commonly infected sites in our upper airways. Right. On top of that, the people who get the most infections in their tonsils and the most severe infections in their tonsils are kids, especially school age kids. And part of that is because our tonsils, which are present from birth, actually grow during early childhood and they reach their peak in size in kids ages like four to eight and then they start to regress as we get older. Interesting. On top of that, comparative to body size, the tonsils are the largest in very young kids. So rather than like school age and like teenage years, when the tonsils are still kind of growing, when they're very young, like three, four, compared to the size of their throat, tonsils are really big. even though they're going to continue to grow. Does that make sense?
SPEAKER_01
30:16 - 30:22
Yeah. And then like the swelling then is exactly. So much more pronounced.
SPEAKER_04
30:22 - 31:41
Yes. So that is where this type of inflammation can cause real problems. This infection and inflammation can either just be very recurrent, especially in like school aged kids from like five to 15. It can cause really recurrent infections, which can end up with a lot of miss school. or just a lot of pain, a lot of exposure to antibiotics, as we heard in our first hand account, which was not even during a school age. This kind of hypertrophy can also put kids at increased risk of things like recurrent ear infections, because hypertrophy of various tonsular tissue can also then compress the use station tubes where our ears are supposed to drain, which is what can increase the risk of ear infections. And of course, if tonsils and especially adenoids, which sit at the top back of our nasopharynx, become severely enlarged and hypertrophy, It can cause problems with breathing. Both in the acute form where an acute infection can be a real risk of respiratory distress or just over time, it can cause obstructive sleep apnea in kids. There is also a phenomenon that you may have heard of called peritonsular abscess.
SPEAKER_01
31:41 - 31:45
Did you come across that? I did not, but abscess in tonsils.
SPEAKER_04
31:45 - 32:44
Abscess in tonsils. And it's not really in tonsils, really. This is a complication that happens when an infection kind of spreads beyond the tonsils. It can also happen in absence of tonsils, even after a tonsilectomy, for example. But it's essentially just a group of deep space neck infections. So abscesses either right next to the tonsils or in the back of the tonsils or in the retroferendial or paraphringial space. Essentially our neck is very complicated with a whole bunch of things in it in a really small amount of space. So we have a lot of like, facial layers separating these all. And if infection spreads beyond some of those facial planes, it can become very severe and lead to airway compromise really easily. That makes sense. So these type of infections can be really serious because they can, you know, cause a lot of swelling and make it so that people can't breathe.
SPEAKER_01
32:44 - 32:49
And is this associated with certain pathogens or is it just like anything can do it?
SPEAKER_04
32:50 - 33:15
Anything can do it. Bacterial infections are going to be much more likely to cause an abscess than anything like a viral infection. And streptococchi, like your group A streptrop throat, is a really common one, but by no means the only pathogen that can cause these types of infections. Okay. Yeah. And then there are tonsils stones. Yay, I'm so glad you're talking about these.
SPEAKER_01
33:15 - 33:24
I've had two in my life. Yeah, and one just recently. One recently and the other one was I was like a freshman in college or a sophomore in college.
SPEAKER_04
33:24 - 33:49
Tons of stones are just collections of schmuts, really. It's unsatisfying, I feel. I know. It's just schmuts that get stuck in those little crypts in the tonsils. And what our body tends to do to schmuts anywhere in our body is kind of calcify it. To be like, let's wall this off and package it up so that it doesn't cause any more problems. And in so-doing, it can sometimes cause problems.
SPEAKER_01
33:49 - 33:54
It's like cask of a matiato style. I have that joke on this podcast before.
SPEAKER_04
33:54 - 33:59
I don't know because I don't know what it means because I'm probably not smart enough.
SPEAKER_01
33:59 - 34:17
No, it's like some Edgar Allan Poe story. I think we're somebody like bricks in somebody else in into a wall and I thought is it the heart, the telltale heart thing? That was just someone who killed someone. Well, we need to refresh our poe. We're knowledge. We're not getting it.
SPEAKER_04
34:17 - 34:43
No. Anyways, tonsils, stones, shmuts in your tonsils. These can also happen in your salary glands. Like, they can happen in a lot of other places. That's not, that's all I really have for that. It's not all that exciting. But those are the kind of ways in which tonsils can become a problem. And why someone might need to undergo a toncelectomy and or an adenoidctomy?
SPEAKER_01
34:43 - 35:11
Are stones enough for that? No, no, no. So there are reasons to remove tonsils, but maybe not as much as people used to lean into in historical times. Yeah. But what happens when those tonsils are gone? Because it seems like from what am I growing up interpretation or like what, you know, my ingrained knowledge and also reading about this is that there aren't many negative consequences.
SPEAKER_04
35:11 - 36:53
Yeah, so there's risks associated with surgery, right? So most of the complications that we see are in that acute phase where you have risk of things like bleeding, you have risk of infection as a result of surgery, bleeding is really the big one. And in really severe cases, people can end up dying as a result of complications from surgery. Very rare, but surgery is surgery and so complications can happen. Beyond that surgical complication time frame, we don't really have a lot of data to say that there are negative effects in the long term from not having tonsils. And when it's indicated, like in the case of really recurrent infections, or even in the case of obstructive sleep apnea in young kids, there is some data that there is benefit to tonsil removal in those cases. because it can significantly reduce the rate of recurrent infection and in kids with obstructive sleep it can improve their sleep even if it's only in the short term and we'll get more into that later. But it's fascinating that something that would appear as integral as a major source of antibodies and a major source of sampling of our environment to protect against infection can be removed with relatively little consequence. To me, what I think makes that so fascinating is it kind of shows how many redundancies we have in our bodies.
SPEAKER_01
36:53 - 36:56
I was just about to say, it's like built in redundancy. Exactly.
SPEAKER_04
36:56 - 37:56
And it is, right? Because whenever tonsils are being removed, it's not all of them. You still have your language tonsils. You still have those tubal tonsils. Nobody's removing those. It's just the Palatine tonsils and sometimes the adenoids, sometimes both, but sometimes just like one or the other, right? So first of all, we have redundancy just within that. There's also additional, like, malt-like tissue throughout other parts of our mucosa that just isn't as well organized as the actual tonsils themselves. And then, of course, there's the rest of our entire immune system, which is doing all the same stuff. It's just doing it in a slightly different way than this mucosal lymphoid tissue is doing. So cool. It is. And there's a lot more that we could do in talking about malt and galt because. Yeah, like celiac, for example, is associated with discrepancies in galt and IGA secretion and things like that. Like it's, it's really cool.
SPEAKER_01
37:56 - 37:57
Well, that's on our list for sure.
SPEAKER_04
37:57 - 38:18
It is. So that's tonsils. Aaron, they're amazing. They're so cool. Except from their problem. And then it's cool that you can take them out. So tell me, Aaron, where did we get to hear from? Is that?
SPEAKER_01
38:18 - 39:10
What did I just share what I brought with me to share right after this break, please? So it turns out that people have been irritated about tonsils or found them to be like troublesome enough to get rid of them for millennia.
SPEAKER_04
39:10 - 39:19
Stop it. Oh, yeah. I don't want a millennia to go anyone cutting anything out of me. I gotta be honest with you. Well, listen to enough episodes of this podcast.
SPEAKER_01
39:23 - 40:32
Um, I think that given some of the quotes that I'm going to toss and sprinkle in throughout here, you will, that opinion will be even more reinforced. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, because this was like pre anesthesia, pre antibiotics. Nope. But I was honestly really taken aback by the number of references to tons of electimes over the centuries. They're everywhere. All right, so from 1000 BC E in a Hindu medicine textbook, Quote, when the flim and blood are deranged in the soft palate and tonsils, they become large and like a full bladder. A company with thirst, cough, and difficulty in breathing. When troublesome, they are to be seized between the blades of a forseps, drawn forward, and with a semi-circular knife, the third of the swelled part is removed. If all be removed, so much blood may be discharged as will destroy the individual. If total is removed, it will produce an increase in the swelling with fainting and swimming of head.
SPEAKER_04
40:32 - 40:45
And quote, oh my goodness. Yeah. I can picture every piece of that that you just described like very clearly. And I don't like it.
SPEAKER_01
40:45 - 41:17
Oh, okay. If you didn't like this one, you're really not going to like this. Give it to me. Okay. So this is from Celsius, a Roman aristocrat who lived from like 25 BCE to 50 CE. Quote. They ought to be disengaged all round by the finger and removed. What? If they are not separated by this method, it is necessary to take them up with a blunt hook and separate them with a scalpel, then to wash them with vinegar and annoyed the wound with a stiptic application.
SPEAKER_04
41:17 - 41:28
Can you just imagine how much that would hurt because you're talking about an acutely inflamed angry organ and using a fingernail.
SPEAKER_01
41:35 - 43:54
I really feel like this quote as the kid say has lived like rent free in my head since reading it. I just keep, I have this intrusive thought of like a fingernail. I'm sorry. I know. But the way that both of these descriptions are written kind of sounds like this is a relatively common procedure. Yeah. And that's supported by the many, many more quotes that I'm going to toss in here. So for instance, in the second century CE, Galen wrote about using a snare to amputeate the tonsil. And this method increased in popularity over the centuries with a few authors advocating for like, hey, let's remove just part of it and not all of it so that we don't cause hemorrhage. Mm-hmm. Yeah. Good call. Yeah. The next quote, I think, provides an excellent glimpse into the world of pre-modern day surgery. From the fourth century CE, Greek physician Paul of Agina wrote, quote, when, therefore, they are inflamed, we must not meddle with them. But when the inflammation is considerably abated, we may operate more especially upon such as our white, contracted, and have a narrow base. But those which are spongy, red, and have a broad base are apt to bleed. Therefore, seating the person in the light of the sun and directing him to open his mouth while one assistant holds his hand and another presses down the tongue with a wooden spatula, we take a hook. and perforate the tonsil with it. And drag it outwards as much as we can without drawing its membranes along with it. And then we cut it out by the root with a scalpel suited to that hand. After ligation, the patient must gargle with cold water or oxycrate, which is a mixture of water and vinegar, or if hemorrhage occurs, he may use a tepid decoction of brambles, roses, or mortal leaves. End quote. That's very detailed. I think the thing that's stuck out to me the most with that was that make sure that they're like it's the noon day sun and that the light is penetrating the back of their throat. I just didn't think of that.
SPEAKER_04
43:54 - 43:56
Also, someone is holding their hand. Yeah.
SPEAKER_01
43:57 - 45:54
So during the Middle Ages, tonsilectimese went through a decline in popularity, like many other surgeries, and swollen or abscessed tonsils were mostly dealt with through just like lancing the tonsil rather than straight up removal. But you know how trends come and go. Yeah. I'm thinking about buying flare jeans, which I never thought I would do again after high school. that would be cool. And by the 16th century or so, people were starting to get back into removal. Ambeross Paray, a very famous French surgeon and an atomist. He was one of the major ones to kickstart surgery and also work on like surgical improvements during this period. He was a big proponent of gradually strangling the tonsil with a ligature until circulation was cut off. Which just like sounds deeply unpleasant. I mean, at least you'd bleed a lot less. I mean, yeah. Yeah. But I think that this like this next quote speaks to some of the discomfort. So someone from this era wrote that this method of taunts elect me quote is liable to resolve itself into physical combat between the surgeon and his patient. And quote. Oh, dear. I mean, yeah, yeah, I feel like it's not even like you're not, you just had, it's like instinctive like you just, yeah, you're going to fight it out of my mouth exactly. Other surgeons at the time objected to the procedure because of what was thought about the purpose and physiology of tonsils, which was that essentially they absorbed the secretions that came from the brain and then exited through the nasal cavity and then the tonsils like sent them back to the brain after filtering something like that.
SPEAKER_04
45:54 - 45:58
Wow, that is complicated.
SPEAKER_01
45:58 - 46:50
Right. And so with the tonsils gone, those secretions would just linger and cause horseness. So it turns out that the controversy around removing tonsils is nearly as old as the procedure itself. So for instance, take this quote by Dionys from 1672, quote, Some of our ancestors proposed the separation and evulsion of these glands, which operation they very easily performed. I refer you the methods which they propose to do it, which I think very cruel. For the function these glands being to separate and filtrate the sacroities, which serve to moisten the tongue, larynx and esophagus. These parts must find themselves deprived of that dew, which is of great use and tempering of the air in the lungs and sliding the nourishment into the stomach.
SPEAKER_04
46:50 - 46:51
Okay, yeah.
SPEAKER_01
46:54 - 47:56
And so on this theme of controversy, I found this quote in many of the other quotes that I've mentioned so far in a paper titled, quote, a history of taunts elect me, to millennia of trauma, hemorrhage, and controversy. Oh, and quote. So I wonder which side the author fell on. And yeah, so, you know, of course, for there to be a debate, there has to be at least two sides. So on the other side was a physician from Philadelphia named Philip Singh Fissic, who in 1828 modified an instrument that was normally used to remove the uvila and used it as a tonsil guillotine. He wrote, quote, it is easy to cut off the whole or any portion that may be necessary of the enlarged tonsil. The operation can be fulfilled in a moment of time. The pain is very little, and the hemorrhage so moderate that it has not required any alteration in four cases in which the doctor has recently performed it.
SPEAKER_04
47:57 - 48:01
Sorry, I'm also really wondering why they were taking out people's euvielas?
SPEAKER_01
48:01 - 48:13
I don't know. That part. Yeah, that's like the sneaky scary terrifying part. Yeah, I don't know. Okay. Mm-hmm. We should run episode on the euviela.
SPEAKER_04
48:13 - 48:14
We should, I guess.
SPEAKER_01
48:14 - 48:35
Now we have to learn about the euviela guillotine. Euviela. And this tool that he developed, the tonsil atone, was a popular choice for partial tonsil like May's for about 80 years. But some people still use the good ol' fingernail. Seriously. Seriously.
SPEAKER_04
48:35 - 48:48
I cannot. They're actual fingers. Yes. It's gruesome. Yeah. I also just like, I'm thinking about tonsils. Doesn't seem easy.
SPEAKER_01
48:49 - 50:33
No. Nothing ever worth doing was easy. I think it's their mentality or something, something like that. But up until the early 20th century, the removal of tonsils via surgery or fingernail was only partial. And physicians had noticed that partial removal didn't necessarily alleviate all of the symptoms that it was supposed to. Some people had regrowth, tissue, others had persistent infections, and so they began to try to take more of the tonsils out. And they realized that, frankly, the tonsil guillotine or tonsil atone was not up to the task. After a series of close but no cigar attempts at full removal by surgeons throughout the 1890s, English Odelairengologist George Waw succeeded in publishing about the dissection method he used to completely remove the tonsils. And with this, tonsilectimese, the word first used in 1904, took over modern surgery. not at exaggeration, not an overstatement. During the first half of the 20th century, from 1915 to 1960, taunts elect me along with Adnoidectomy were the most frequently performed surgeries in the US. Wow, yeah. But like, why? Yeah, just because they could, just because it's like Everest. What about tonsils just made people want to rip them out of you? And what happened in the mid-20th century to change everyone's mind? Why was this trend reversed?
SPEAKER_04
50:33 - 50:36
I can't wait to my nose.
SPEAKER_01
50:36 - 50:42
And if you were hoping for like a one-line answer, you've come to the wrong podcast.
SPEAKER_04
50:42 - 50:44
No one wants a one-liner, Erin. No, they don't.
SPEAKER_01
50:45 - 53:42
So to really get at the heart of that question, we have to consider not only what people thought tonsils did or didn't do, but also how surgery was changing, how hospitals were changing, how germ theory was driving concepts of infection and disease, and how the theory of evolution was shifting the way we viewed forum and function in our bodies. So yeah, it's about the tonsils, but it's also about so much more than the tonsils. Oh, I love when this happens. Okay, so let's set the stage with the introduction of germ theory in the mid 1800s and then widespread acceptance of it by the end of that century and a phalan, you know, war on infectious disease launched in the 20th. Many physicians had started to look for a causative pathogen for every disease that came across their exam table. I've talked about this before many times, but they also began to try to tease apart why pathogens mainly bacteria at this point acted the way they did. Why did the cholera bacterium colonize the gut while diphtheria was found in the throat? at what point and why did pathogenic bacteria invade the bloodstream? And to try to answer these questions, there arose a concept called focal infection theory. Essentially, this idea, which was primarily popular in the US, especially in the early 20th century, and not so much elsewhere, This idea held that different infections arose in certain areas of the body. And if not contained, they could spill out into the bloodstream and travel to the rest of the body from there. So there were different like foci of infection, whether it was your throat, whether it was your gut. And that's where that bacteria lived. And then if it overflowed, that's when it became super deadly. Went to your bloodstream. And this seemed to be especially popular among American surgeons since most of the foci of infection were, quote, anything that is readily accessible for surgery. And quote, one pathologist joked. And consoles fit the bill exactly. They were located in the throat, which was seen as a major portal of infection along with the mouth and nose. They were easily accessible and centuries of successful removal suggested that they weren't missed all too much. Provided you stopped the hemorrhaging. The question of whether their removal actually did anything didn't really seem to come into play, at least for a while. Personal experience from the surgeon was more of the gold standard of the day than say like a case control study or like statistics.
SPEAKER_04
53:42 - 53:45
Like if they thought it was great, then it was great kind of a thing.
SPEAKER_01
53:45 - 53:52
And it don't leading all right. Like I took the tonsils out of this patient that kept getting sore throats and now they don't get sore throats.
SPEAKER_04
53:52 - 53:57
Uh-huh. Or you just don't see them anymore because there's nothing for you to search rice. Exactly.
SPEAKER_01
53:57 - 55:56
Oh, okay. I mean anyways, you know, it's a while for statistics to catch up. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And of course this didn't, this wasn't like why it acceptance, right? This wasn't tonsilectimese for everyone. Surgeons varied in how enthusiastic they were about the procedure and how likely they were to recommend it. Some thought prophylactic removal was best. Like, whoa, you get to a certain age, get them out of there, get those tonsiles gone. Others were more conservative, recommending removal only after multiple infections. But by and large, the predominant belief about tonsils was that no one knew exactly what they did. What their purpose was. But they did think that they were behind many systemic infections, harboring bacteria that entered the throat and then replicated in the tonsils and then were released to the rest of the body through the bloodstream. So the tonsils reviewed is like this incubator of infection. Interesting. And so getting rid of them, ideal, no big deal at the very minimum, the best thing you could do at the maximum. In a 1920s paper by Edwin Place, quote, the importance of the tonsils in the acute infections as a point of attack and as a portal of entry for infections is so much a matter of common experience as to require no demonstration here and quote, citation not needed. which I find kind of amazing like how without much supporting evidence or direct investigation looking at what the tonsils actually did there was just like an assumption widespread that they were not important.
SPEAKER_04
55:56 - 56:28
I wonder how much of it could have been the bias of seeing only the abnormal that you see, right? Like if you only see the kids who are coming to you because their tonsils are giant and swollen and their causing problems, take them out, you're fixing people, but you're not seeing all of the people who's not having any problems with their tonsils and who are living just fine, right? But it's like, you only are seeing these so they're only a problem. I don't know, but I don't know. I don't know.
SPEAKER_01
56:28 - 01:00:56
Well, and one of the things that I was thinking about as I read for this episode was how much that attitude about like the tonsils not being important might have been driven by this idea of vestigial structures. So vestigial structures are structures that have remained in a species, but during evolution lost their primary ancestral function. And so they appear not to serve a purpose. I always thought that, you know, appendix and tonsils, whatever, we're all lumped together under vestigial structures. And that's what, like, I grew up thinking that tonsils were not necessary, and that's why people removed them, and they're just some remnant of evolution. Okay, but let's, I want to get into a little bit of like the origins of this concept of vestigial structures gained traction especially since Darwin's on the origin of species and the descent of man in the mid-19th century introducing the theory of evolution. And also in Robert Weedershimes, the structure of man in 1895, where he listed dozens of vestigial structures in humans. Oh, tonsils were not on Weedershimes list, but plenty of people believed that they didn't have a purpose any longer. So it seems plausible to me, at least, this is definitely a pet hypothesis, that the enthusiasm for tonsillectomy was driven in part by embracing the theory of evolution by natural selection, where vestigial structures were seen as evidence for evolution. We know now, of course, that many structures previously considered vestigial like tonsils and the appendix aren't actually vestigial, like they still have a function. It might be slightly different than its evolutionary origins, but the fact that they have a function does not at all refute the existence of evolution. which is what many creationists do we'll try to argue that like there is no such thing as a vestigial structure because there are no mistakes and also we didn't evolve from other organisms so all vestigial structures must have a function. I'm not going to get into that whole kind of worms. I will link to some papers about the concept of vestigial organs, which do exist if you're curious and want to read more. But I just thought it was really interesting sort of this timing of when vestigial organs and the theory of evolution was like gaining traction, growing in popularity, did that timing help to spur the frequency of tons of electemies? That's really interesting. I don't know. That's my little pet hypothesis. But if it did, it was certainly wasn't the only thing. Throughout the first half of the 20th century, surgery overall had experienced a tremendous shift. The combination of anesthesia, which had been around since at least the 19th century, antibiotics in the 1930s and 1940s, the growth of hospitals, and the formalization of medical and surgical training, had led to a rapid expansion of surgery overall, and the development of many specialties within surgery and medicine. and what better procedure to practice on and earn money on than the minimally invasive, generally low-risk tonsillectomy. It became a routine operation for so very many children. I couldn't find a ton of numbers, but I did read that in between 1928 and 1931, tons of electimates accounted for about one-third of all surgical operations. In 1920, in New York City alone, 47,000 tons of electimates were performed. By the mid-1900s, nearly half of the kids in some regions had had their tonsils removed. And it estimated 1.5 to 2 million individuals, largely children, had their tonsils removed in peak years in the US. Wow.
SPEAKER_04
01:00:56 - 01:01:05
Oh gosh, with numbers like that, it's no wonder that it's part of our collective consciousness.
SPEAKER_01
01:01:05 - 01:03:57
Right? Wow. And also, like, how amazing the shift has been. And so, tons of electemies gained traction through parenting books, pediatricians, even just a word of mouth. And they were hailed as all, but essential if you wanted to ensure the health of your child. But while many surgeons and pediatricians were content to accept this as just fact, others had decided to apply a little thing called statistics. One of the largest and earliest studies, comparing kids with and without tonsils, with upwards of 20,000 children, found results that were largely unsatisfying to tonsillectomy enthusiasts. It did seem that there were some benefits such as reduction in sore throats, cervical adenitis, otitis media, scarlet fever, diphtheria, rheumatic fever, and heart disease. Others found like the opposite trends with some of those. But when it came to sinusitis, cold, chickenpox, mumps, measles tuberculosis, asthma, and hay fever, nothing. Or as another study found, higher rates in those who had had their tonsils removed. A reminder here, to take this with a grain of salt, considering that it was the 1920s, follow-up was patchy at best. Statistics were developing, but these studies and many others that followed were the first signs that maybe tons of electome is weren't like all that they had promised to be. doubt continued to grow into the 1930s as people began to question the justifications that had previously been accepted without reservation, like the focal theory of disease, which by this time had fallen out of favor. then there was the question of what a diseased tonsil looked like. Tonsils like many other body parts come in all shapes and sizes and they changed not just like over many years but also they could change day to day. Absolutely. So what looks, you know, quote unquote irregular to one surgeon could look totally normal to another, also based on their personal experience, is there a standard for tonsil size? No. Studies like the one I mentioned continued to cast out on the utility of tons of electimes with the author of that big study saying, quote, the desired relationship between the tonsils and the various infections in childhood is not as clear today as it seemed 10 years ago. Mm-hmm. Statistical and controlled clinical studies have obliged us to modify or even change our views on this relationship. Oh, quote.
SPEAKER_04
01:03:57 - 01:04:03
The statistics. Making things less fun for everyone, just kidding.
SPEAKER_01
01:04:03 - 01:06:25
Always. But also science at work. Yeah. On top of the whole rationale for tonsillectomy being called into question was the finding that many of the procedures had been incomplete with residual tonsill tissue found in well over half of some groups of patients. By the late 1930s, a reckoning had truly begun. But for a long time, that reckoning was more or less confined to the medical literature. Huh? Pediatricians continue to recommend tonsillectomy and add noidectomy for their patients not just in extreme cases or not just when they felt it warranted it, but it was like at the drop of the hat and this continued for decades. And parents who had maybe grown up having their own tonsils removed continued to ask for the procedure for their kids, even long after that. The shift in attitude surrounding tonsillectomy and its rise and fall is I think one of the clearest examples that I've come across of the time lag in scientific research, reaching application and general knowledge. Interesting. A new concept is put forth, like the tonsillectomy is maybe not being as necessary as once thought. It takes a while until it's accepted among other researchers in that like niche field because they've got a test it confirmed that there's evidence to support it. And then it takes even longer to sneak its way into application or textbooks. And then even longer until it reaches the general public. So like if you were a pediatrician trained during the time that tons of electimates were all the rage and you learned in your med school training that hey, if you have a kid that has one sore throat, take them out. They're gone. Take them out prophylactically, might as well. Then let's say that you go into teaching. You spend the rest of your career 30, 40, 50 years teaching the next generation of pediatricians, potentially that this is a routine surgery of childhood. And this is a gross generalization. And this is like an exaggeration of how things can be. Not really.
SPEAKER_04
01:06:25 - 01:06:30
Not usually. Not usually air. Not usually. Like, it happens every day.
SPEAKER_01
01:06:30 - 01:06:58
Like, how long does it take for a new generation of doctors to unlearn what had been previously accepted knowledge? And where is that older physician that one who's teaching all of these new physicians? Where are they going to encounter dissenting views without routinely looking through primary literature? And without training in epidemiology or statistics, how are they going to assess how legitimate the conclusions of a study are?
SPEAKER_04
01:07:00 - 01:07:07
Oh, Erin, this is one of my favorite things because it's something I think about literally all the time at my other job, too.
SPEAKER_01
01:07:07 - 01:07:25
You know, there is such a gap, not just in primary research and sort of getting that to non-specialty fields or like fields outside of that specialty, but then how long does that information then take to reach the general public?
SPEAKER_04
01:07:25 - 01:07:34
It's, it's so long, Erin. Like, in the 1920s, it was probably even longer. And even today with the internet, it's still long.
SPEAKER_01
01:07:34 - 01:11:13
Oh, it's still so, it's so long. I mean, in the case of tonsils, we have, like, decades, decades. It began to be realized in the 1920s, and then when did the trends really change? I would say 1960's more widespread within the medical community, and then 1970's and 80's is when like the decline had really begun. Wow. Yeah. And there were like still articles about the benefits of taunt selectamies in parenting books. And not all the time. Like sometimes there was, you know, urging caution with taunt selectamie and, you know, recommended removal in only extreme cases. And this was not like, you know, we're not talking about And then we turned a corner and then, you know, immediate sharp differences in this, like the conversation continue to exist around tons of electemes. So there was more negative press than the 1940s and 1950s, but like Parents really wanted their kids to have tons of electemies. And it wasn't just parents recommending it, right? It was pediatricians who had that's what they had learned to do. That and the growth of voluntary health insurance plans post World War II, which is likely why we see higher rates of tons of electemies during that time period in children from middle and upper class families. IE those who can afford to pay for an elective surgery. who cared to those without insurance. That's sort of an interesting little tidbit. Sure is. And so, like I said, 1960s doubt became more, you know, on the loudspeaker, 1970s and 80s rates had really declined. And part of this decline, I have no doubt, was the rise in antibiotic use, which could treat many infections commonly associated with tonsils and the growing specialization in pediatrics. where pediatricians rarely received surgical training and so were just less exposed to tonsillectomy's overall. That's at least according to one paper. That's suggested that. In 1965 in the US, 1,215,000 tonsillectomies were performed. Just a couple of decades later, in 1986, that number had fallen to 281,000. and then it rose again in 1996 to 383,000 but like you know that could be a number of different factors. And I should point out that the U.S. where all of these numbers come from was the leading tonsillectomy country. The procedure was also popular in England, but not as popular and fell out of favor sooner. This reexamination of the necessity of tonsillectomy is allowed for more careful consideration of when they should be performed. Because as you talked about as our first-hand demonstrates, there are still many cases where it is essential. But the history of tonsillectomy is provides, but I think is one of the most fascinating glimpses into the inertia of scientific knowledge, where it can take literally generations to incorporate new findings into practice and then generations more into general knowledge. And that's the history of tonsils. I love that, Mary. This is one of my favorite ones to do recently, I think. I, I loved listening to it. So Erin, tell me what's going on with tonsils today. We're still doing them, but like under what circumstances.
SPEAKER_04
01:11:13 - 01:16:38
Yeah, okay, let me tell you, right out to this break. Honestly, it was very difficult pretty much impossible to get any kind of data on incidents, prevalence of tonsillitis, or recurrent tonsillitis, or fair and dreadest, like, come on. We can't do that. It's too common. It's so common. It's everyone everywhere all the time. I had to start through yesterday, okay? It's nearly always self-limited. It's not an infection that we can track. But that doesn't mean I have no data for you. I found a very interesting paper out of the UK. It's a few years old now. But it was very interesting, what it looked at specifically was the incidence of toncelectomy and the proportion of these toncelectamies that were based on what they considered to be truly evidence-based criteria versus the proportion of toncelectamies that were not fitting with evidence-based criteria. This was from 2005 to 2016, so like a little old, but like that's super old, so like, kind enough. What's fascinating about this study is that what they found overall in conclusion is that in the UK, in the population that they looked at, it wasn't every kid in the UK, but it was several hundred thousand kids about four in one thousand children. And this, again, was all in children. Four in a thousand met evidence-based criteria for Tonselectomy. So first of all, we can talk about what does that actually look like? Like what today is considered guideline approval evidence-based for Tonselectomy? Yeah. The major criteria is what are called the paradise criteria. I don't know why, don't ask why. And this is pretty Like hardcore criteria, it is seven documented episodes of severe sore throat or tonsillitis in one single year. Seven. And part of it is that this is documented as severe sore throat, meaning that a sore throat that's not bad where someone doesn't go to the doctor wouldn't count because those episodes are considered to be less severe. Could you argue about access to health care, et cetera? Yes, definitely this is in the UK. They at least have a national health care system. Okay. So it's seven episodes of severe sore throat in one year or five per year for two years in a row or three per year for three years in a row. Okay. Those are the most common criteria, the paradise criteria. The other criteria that they considered in this paper to be evidence-based was a tonsiller tumor, which makes sense. Yep. And a condition called PFAPA, which stands for periodic fever. Apthus, stomatitis, pharyngeitis, and adenitis. That's a lot of ituses. It's a lot of ituses. And what this actually is is like a genetic condition that results in these periodic fevers, these ulcers in the mouth, and a sore throat, and swollen, tonsils, adenoids, and lymph nodes, and things like that. Okay. It's not super common. It's a genetic disorder. We could probably do a whole episode on it. But those are the three things that they considered as evidence-based criteria for taunt's electomy. Four in a thousand kids in this study met criteria. Like that was the overall prevalence. But less than one in seven of those kids had a taunt's electomy. Between two to three kids per 1,000 each year had a taunts elect me, but less than one in eight of the kids who had taunts elect me actually had an evidence-based indication. Whoa. Yeah. So like lots of kids met criteria for Tons Electomy for what they considered evidence-based criteria for Tons Electomy. Did not have a Tons Electomy? Uh-huh. And many, many more kids did not meet criteria for Tons Electomy and yet had a Tons Electomy. So their overall conclusion was that of the 37,000 Tons Electomies that were performed in the UK in this time, in this population each year, 32,000 of them were quote unnecessary.
SPEAKER_01
01:16:38 - 01:16:42
What is going on? Okay.
SPEAKER_04
01:16:42 - 01:17:12
Here's part of what's going on. A large proportion of the kids who underwent tons of electing me in this study had one, two, or three, or sometimes four, or five, episodes of tons of latest. So they had severe sore throat, they had evidence of tons of infection, but not enough per year to meet this evidence-based criteria. Okay. That's a big one. The other one is sleep apnea or obstructive sleep disorder breathing.
SPEAKER_01
01:17:12 - 01:17:17
which is not on the list of recommended whatever criteria.
SPEAKER_04
01:17:17 - 01:20:39
So in this paper, in the UK, it's not considered an evidence-based indication. But the number of kids who have been having and who have been recommended for taunt select me and really add annoyed act to me, especially, and sometimes not both, sometimes just add annoyed act to me. who were referred for tonsilectimese over that time period for obstructive sleep disorder breathing or obstructive sleep apnea increased over this time period and It's really interesting because in this paper, in the UK, it was not considered an evidence-based indication, but what they did mention is that there is data that shows that adenoyantectomy specifically, so removal of just that pharyngeal console. Does reduce snoring and can show short-term improvements in the quality of life on a few different metrics for kids ages five to nine who have obstructive sleep disorder breathing or obstructive sleep apnea and who undergo adenoidctomy? But there isn't a lot of long-term data on its effectiveness, and there is not necessarily data that it improves all possible outcomes or all possible complications associated with sleep disorder breathing. Okay. So according to this paper, that was not enough evidence to consider it an evidence-based indication. Does that make sense? Yes. It doesn't necessarily mean there's no utility in it or that it can't be beneficial. It just means according to this, there wasn't enough data. So I think that that's an interesting part because part of the story of the number of ton selectamies is like, how bad does it have to be? To consider ton selectamies evidence-based versus not, right? Like, what outcomes are we looking at? How much data do we have to prove that? Like, what are we going off of? So that was in the UK. What's interesting is that that paper highlighted that the rates of tonsillectomy vary really widely across the globe. That paper specifically just mentioned that rates in Belgium, Finland, and Norway are about twice as high as in the UK, whereas Spain, Italy, and Poland significantly lower than the UK. And then in the US, rates tend to be about three times as high as in the UK. So let's think about the U.S. for a quick moment here. Yeah, love to. According to the American Academy of Otolaringology and had an extraordinary foundation, and this was data that was in a 2019 update on their guidelines, but I think the data is older than that. There are about 289,000 tons of electimese performed each year just on kids under age 15. It's really hard to get data on tons of electimese in adults because it's a much, much less common procedure. Which, what's interesting about that number 289,000 is that Erin, you said that that was the number at the end of the 80s. So like, yeah, it just hasn't really changed, which I find really interesting.
SPEAKER_01
01:20:39 - 01:20:55
Well, that's what I was wondering about when you were talking about the criteria that recommend removal or whatever, how when were those criteria, instituted, how often do we revisit criteria, yeah, take them off, whatever, like, it's just all part of it.
SPEAKER_04
01:20:55 - 01:24:49
The most recent update that I could find was 2019, but those had been updated again in 2011. And so it's not that infrequent that this society seems to be updating their guidelines. And what's interesting about the American Academy of Oterlingology's guidelines is that obstructive sleep disorder breathing is an indication for which they do recommend. I don't know you'd act to me. But they also say that the evidence is not as strong for this indication as it is for those paradise criteria indication really. And the newest guidelines have a strong recommendation. So like whenever you look at guidelines, it's always like low quality, moderate quality, high quality in terms of the evidence behind it. And then what is the recommendation? Is it like a think about it or like a week kind of recommend it or we strongly recommend it? That's like how guidelines are worded. So they updated their guidelines to strongly recommend holding off, watchful waiting unless a kid has had at least seven, unless a kid meets these criteria, essentially the paradise criteria. So it seems like the guidelines are really in terms of recurrent infections, moving more towards pause, wait, treat with antibiotics. Let's really wait and see if this kid truly needs a tonsillectomy. But in the case of sleep disorder breathing, maybe the numbers are going up as we get more evidence for it. Yeah, okay. At this point, we still don't have a ton of evidence for it, especially in the long term, but there is evidence for short-term improvements in sleep outcomes, as well as behavioral parameters, like school performance and things like that, because not being able to sleep affects a lot of your life. Yeah. We're not being able to breathe while you're asleep. I should say it for you. I mean, yeah. So that's kind of where we stand with tonsillitis and tonsillate activities. And when it comes to what I wanted to talk about with the future of tonsillitis, I really didn't know where I wanted to go. There seemed like so many possibilities, but luckily I found this fascinating paper took me to a place I never expected. In 2021, you're ready for this area. It's pretty exciting. I don't know. A better be. In 2021, there was a paper published in Nature Medicine by someone named Wagar at all, I think. Sorry if I pronounced it wrong. Here's what they did, Aaron. They took tonsil tissue, like tissue from discarded tonsils after a tonsilidectomy, I presume, and grew it in cell culture. Cool. And what this tonsil tissue did was re-aggregate it itself into little organoids, little baby tonsils on your own cell culture plate. And then what they did was they exposed these tiny baby little tonsils. Two things like, for example, alive, attenuated flu vaccine, which is something that we know a lot about how these flu vaccines work in our bodies and what kind of an immune response it generates. And they did this to study the immune response in these little baby organoid tonsils on a cell culture plate. What they were doing is creating a new type of model system to be able to study the human immune response. And specifically, our antibody mediated immune response, which, again, our tonsils are particularly good at, especially for things like respiratory infections.
SPEAKER_01
01:24:49 - 01:24:55
We have underestimated and underappreciated tonsils for far too long. I agree.
SPEAKER_04
01:24:57 - 01:25:56
That is so cool. It's so cool. They went beyond. They also tested it with like SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines. And then there was another study that I'll also link to that like just really specifically looked at using this as a model for SARS infection for SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is a fascinating, amazing tool to be able to study things like future vaccine development, to be able to test things and see what kind of an immune response is generated in a very realistic human model rather than just animal models which are far from perfect because animal immune systems are not the same as ours. Really cool, really exciting. I have a couple of fun papers for people to read. tonsils amazing. I know. If people want to read more, boy, have we got something for you?
SPEAKER_01
01:25:56 - 01:26:23
Oh, yeah. So we got lots of sources. I'm going to shout out to, in particular, so I already shouted at that one by McNeil from 1960, a history of tonsillectomy, two millennia of trauma, hemorrhage, and controversy. And then the other one that I want to shout out, although I do have more, is by Grove from 2007, the rise and decline of tons of electome in 20th century America, fascinating.
SPEAKER_04
01:26:23 - 01:27:30
I have a few tons of papers that I want to shout out, three of them. One by Cooper at all, Mucosa associated lymphoid tissues is the title, and it was, again, about all malt, and it was really a great read. Bathala at all from 2013 was a review on the mechanism of sore throat and tonsillitis. Super fascinating and really gets at why ice cream. Why ice cream cold inhibits the release of a lot of these cytokines and it can also like inhibit the actual pain receptors. So like cold is what you want in your throat when it hurts. Oh my gosh, there's more there. You can love about it. Okay. And then another one by Arambula at all from 2021 that was Anatomy and Physiology of the Palatine Tonsils, Adinoids and Lingual Tonsils. And then, of course, I have links to those recent papers about tonsil organoids and using them to study our immune response. You can find the list of sources from this episode, and every single one of our episodes on our website, under the Episodes tab.
SPEAKER_01
01:27:31 - 01:27:41
Thank you so much again, Erin, the third Erin of the episode. Love it. For sharing your story with us, we really appreciate it.
SPEAKER_04
01:27:41 - 01:27:47
We do. We do. Thank you also to Blood Mobile for providing the music for this episode in all of our episodes.
SPEAKER_01
01:27:47 - 01:27:51
Thank you to Tom Briefogel for the amazing audio mixing.
SPEAKER_04
01:27:51 - 01:27:54
Love it. Thank you to exactly right network.
SPEAKER_01
01:27:54 - 01:28:04
And thank you to you listeners. We hope that you liked this episode because we certainly did. We had fun. Yeah.
SPEAKER_04
01:28:04 - 01:28:10
And as always, a special shout out to our patrons. Thank you so much for your support. We couldn't do it without you.
SPEAKER_01
01:28:10 - 01:28:16
Very true. Well, until next time, wash your hands. You filthy animals.